Dose to organs at risk for total body irradiation: Single-institution data using the modulated arc total body irradiation technique.

BACKGROUND: Organs at risk (OAR) dose reporting for total body irradiation (TBI) patients is limited, and standardly reported only as mean doses to the lungs and kidneys. Consequently, dose received and effects on other OAR remain unexplored. To remedy this gap, this study reports dose data on an extensive list of OAR for patients treated at a single institution using the modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI) technique. METHOD: An audit was undertaken of all patients treated with MATBI between January 2015 and March 2021 who had completed their course of treatment. OAR were contoured on MATBI patient treatment plans, with 12 Gy in six fraction prescription. OAR dose statistics and dose volume histogram data are reported for the whole body, lungs, kidneys, bones, brain, lens, heart, liver and bowel bag. RESULTS: The OAR dose data for 29 patients are reported. Mean dose results are body 11.77 Gy, lungs 9.86 Gy, kidneys 11.84 Gy, bones 12.03 Gy, brain 12.12 Gy, right lens 12.31 Gy, left lens 12.64 Gy, heart 11.07 Gy, liver 11.81 Gy and bowel bag 12.06 Gy. Dose statistics at 1-Gy intervals of V6-V13 for lungs and V10-V13 for kidneys are also included. CONCLUSION: This is the first time an extensive list of OAR data has been reported for any TBI technique. Due to the paucity of reporting, this information could be used by centres implementing the MATBI technique, in addition to aiding comparison between TBI techniques, with the potential for greater understanding of the relationship between dose volume data and toxicity.

The inter- and intrarater reliability and feasibility of dietetic assessment of sarcopenia and frailty in potential liver transplant recipients: A mixed-methods study.

Sarcopenia and frailty are associated with poorer outcomes in potential liver transplant (LT) recipients. We examined the reliability and feasibility of dietitians assessing sarcopenia and frailty. Seventy-five adults referred for LT underwent assessments of muscle mass (abdominal CTs), physical function (handgrip strength; HGS, short physical performance battery; SPPB), and frailty (Liver Frailty Index; LFI). Inter- and intrarater reliability and agreement were assessed in subsets of patients using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. CTs were analyzed by a dietitian and two independent experts, two dietitians assessed function and frailty. Feasibility assessed system, patient, and profession factors (staff survey). Inter- and intrarater reliability for CT-defined low muscle were excellent (ICCs > 0.97). Reliability between dietitians was excellent for HGS (0.968, 95% CI, 0.928-0.986), SPPB (0.932, 95% CI, 0.798-0.973), and LFI (0.938, 95% CI 0.861-0.973). Bland-Altman analysis indicated excellent agreement for HGS. All transplant clinicians valued sarcopenia and frailty in LT assessments and considered the dietitian appropriate to perform them. Seven saw no barriers to implementation into practice, while five queried test standardization, learning from repeat testing, and resource cost. Dietetic assessments of sarcopenia and frailty are reliable, feasible, and valued measures in the assessment of potential LT recipients.

Assessment of HDR brachytherapy-replicating prostate radiotherapy planning for tomotherapy, cyberknife and VMAT.

A dosimetric study was undertaken to assess the ability of Cyberknife (CK), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), and TomoTherapy (Tomo) to generate treatment plans that mimic the dosimetry of high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) for prostate cancer. The project aimed to assess the potential of using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for boost treatment of high-risk prostate cancer patients where HDR BT in combination with conformal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the standard of care. The datasets of 6 prostate patients previously treated with HDR BT were collated. VMAT, CK, and TomoTherapy treatment plans were generated for each dataset using the target and organ-at-risk structures as defined by the Radiation Oncologist during the HDR BT treatment process. The HDR BT plan isodoses were also converted into planning structures to assist the other modalities to achieve a HDR BT-like dose distribution. CK plans were created using both the iris collimator (IC) and a multileaf collimator (MLC). Comparison of the techniques was made based on dose-volume indices. Each plan was created at centres experienced using the respective treatment planning systems (TPS). Planning target volume (PTV V100%), i.e., the volume of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving 100% of the relative dose, in VMAT and TomoTherapy SBRT plans was higher than HDR BT plans. PTV V150% and V200%, i.e., volume of the PTV receiving 150% and 200% of the relative dose, were approached on all the CK MLC and TomoTherapy SBRT plans. However, it is not presently achievable for "virtual brachytherapy" SBRT to replicate the same high intraprostatic doses as HDR BT while meeting the constraints on the organs-at-risk (OARs). Half of the CK IC plans achieved PTV V150% but this was at the expense of high rectal dose. TomoTherapy and CK MLC plans achieved PTV V150% and V200% but the bladder dose was higher compared to CK IC plans. VMAT exhibited excellent PTV coverage based on V100 and OAR sparing, but without any ability to achieve the high intra-prostatic doses of HDR (V150% and V200%). SBRT techniques can be used to deliver hypofractionated radiotherapy to the PTV V100%. Based on the comparison of "physical" dose distributions, SBRT cannot presently achieve the same high intraprostatic doses as HDR BT while respecting the OAR constraints. SBRT still remains an attractive treatment option for delivering hypofractionated treatments for prostate cancer compared to HDR BT, in particular as it is less invasive and less resource intensive. Long-term outcomes of clinical trials comparing HDR BT and SBRT "prostate boosts" may show whether the high intraprostatic doses are clinically significant and correlate with outcomes.

Evaluation of kidney motion with and without a pneumatic abdominal compression belt: Considerations for stereotactic radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy for kidney tumours requires an effective motion management strategy. This study assessed the effectiveness of a pneumatic abdominal compression belt in reducing kidney motion during free breathing. METHODS: Thirteen patients, with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) of the abdomen in free breathing with and without a pneumatic abdominal compression belt, were retrospectively reviewed. Points of Interest (POI) were placed on each kidney to determine the greatest magnitude of displacement in all directions. RESULTS: Without compression, all patients had >5.0 mm motion in the craniocaudal (CC) direction in at least one kidney. Median CC excursion of the left superior pole was reduced with compression from 8.0 mm (range 2.0 mm-18.0 mm) to 4.0 mm (range 2.0 mm-10.0 mm, P = 0.047) and right superior pole from 10.0 mm (range 4.0 mm-16.0 mm) to 6.0 mm (range 2.0 mm-10.0 mm, P=value 0.051). A benefit was less evident for the left and right inferior poles with median CC excursion of 6.0 mm versus 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm versus 4.0 mm without and with compression, respectively. Median displacement in the anteroposterior direction (≤3.2 mm) and lateral directions (≤1.3 mm) was similar for left and right kidneys and not significantly altered by compression. Overall, seven patients had kidney motion reduced by >5.0 mm with two reduced by 10.0 mm. CONCLUSION: A pneumatic abdominal compression belt reduced kidney motion by >5.0 mm in seven of thirteen patients. The relative benefit is patient and location specific and should be assessed on an individual basis.

The effect of beam arrangements and the impact of non-coplanar beams on the treatment planning of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare various coplanar and non-coplanar 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) beam arrangements for the delivery of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) to patients with early stage lung cancer, based on the dosimetric criteria from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1021 protocol. METHODS: Ten medically inoperable lung cancer patients eligible for SABR were re-planned using three different coplanar and three different non-coplanar beam arrangements. The plans were compared by assessing planning target volume (PTV) coverage, doses to normal tissues, the high-dose conformity (conformity index) and intermediate dose spillage as defined by the D2cm, (the dose at any point 2 cm away from the PTV), and the R50% (the ratio of the volume of half the prescription dose to the volume of the PTV). RESULTS: Sixty plans in total were assessed. Mean PTV coverage with the prescription isodose was similar between coplanar (95.14%) and non-coplanar (95.26%) techniques (P = 0.47). There was significant difference between all coplanar and all non-coplanar fields for the R50% (P < 0.0001) but none for the D2cm (P = 0.19). The seven and nine field beam arrangements with two non-coplanar fields had less unacceptable protocol deviations (10 and 7) than the seven and nine field plans with only coplanar fields (13 and 8). The 13 field coplanar fields did not improve protocol compliance with eight unacceptable deviations. The 10 field non-coplanar beam arrangement achieved best compliance with the RTOG 1021 dose criteria with only one unacceptable deviation (maximum rib dose). CONCLUSION: A 3DCRT planning technique using 10 fields with ≥6 non-coplanar beams best satisfied high and intermediate dose constraints stipulated in the RTOG 1021 trial. Further investigations are required to determine if minor protocol deviations should be balanced against efficiency with the extended treatment times required to deliver non-coplanar fields and if treatment times can be improved using novel intensity modulated techniques.