Urgent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type-B0,D Acute Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to clarify safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), excluding the primary entry in the descending aorta, for type-B0,D acute aortic dissection (TB0,DAAD) (so-called retrograde type-A acute aortic dissection). METHODS: Forty-six patients with hyperacute-phase (within 2 days after the onset) type-A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) and TB0,DAAD underwent urgent (on the admission or next day) intervention (TEVAR or conventional surgical aortic repair [CSAR]) for 2 years. Results of TEVAR for TB0,DAAD were compared with those of CSAR for TAAAD. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, aortic reintervention, and major complications (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis). Details of TEVAR were also analyzed. RESULTS: Seven patients with TB0,DAAD and 39 patients with TAAAD underwent respectively urgent TEVAR and CSAR. Aortic reintervention was significantly more frequent in the TEVAR than CSAR group (28.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in incidence of death and stroke between the TEVAR and CSAR group. All the 7 patients survived and 5 of the 7 (71.4%) patients were relieved of aortic reintervention for 30 days following TEVAR. One patient, however, underwent aortic arch replacement on postoperative day (POD) 1 owing to the patent and nonshrinking ascending false lumen (FL). The entry existed in the aortic arch. Another patient underwent ascending and transverse aortic replacement with frozen elephant trunk on POD13 due to proximal stent graft-induced new entry irrespective of the thrombosed and shrinking ascending FL. Because of the patent and nonshrinking ascending FL, 1 patient underwent additional TEVAR for the residual entry in the distal descending thoracic aorta on POD33 and subsequently ascending aortic replacement 4 months later. No entry was detected in the ascending or transverse aorta. The ascending FL in the other 4 patients was thrombosed early, shrinking gradually, and disappeared at last following TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent TEVAR for TB0,DAAD may be alternative to CSAR in selected cases. Accurate diagnosis of the primary entry location on preinterventional computed tomography scans for exclusion of the entry and cautious selection and delivery of a stent graft to prevent stent graft-induced new entry or endoleak are requisite for success of the procedure, remodeling of the FL, and satisfactory prognosis.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Although a number of studies compared mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with that after surgical aortic replacement (SAVR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), no meta-analysis of them has been conducted to date. To determine whether TAVI or SAVR is associated with better postprocedural survival in patients with COPD, a meta-analysis of all studies currently available was performed. Design. To identify all comparative studies of TAVI with SAVR in patients with COPD, PubMed and Web of Science were searched through January 2020. Studies meeting the following criteria were included in the present meta-analysis: the design was an observational comparative study or a randomized controlled trial; the study population was patients with COPD; patients were assigned to TAVI versus SAVR; and outcomes included all-cause mortality. Adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) odds or hazard ratios with their confidence intervals (CIs) of mortality for TAVI versus SAVR were extracted from each study. Study-specific estimates were combined in the random-effects model. Results. Six eligible studies with a total of 4771 patients with COPD were identified and included in the present meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated significantly lower early (in-hospital or 30-day) mortality after TAVI than after SAVR (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90; p = .006) but no significant difference in midterm (1-year to 5-year) mortality between TAVI and SAVR (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.79-1.44; p = .68). Conclusions. In patients with COPD, TAVI was associated with reduced early mortality, while midterm mortality appeared similar, as compared with SAVR.

Prognostic impact of baseline C-reactive protein levels on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels can predict mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available studies. METHODS: All studies investigating the prognostic impact of baseline (preprocedural) CRP levels on all-cause mortality after TAVI were identified by means of searching PubMed and Google Scholar through May 2019. For each study, (preferentially, adjusted rather than unadjusted) odds/hazard ratios (ORs/HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of mortality per standard-deviation (SD) (or unit) increase in CRP levels or those for high vs low CRP levels. RESULTS: Our search identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 3449 patients undergoing TAVI and reporting early (in-hospital to 3-month) and midterm (1-year to 3-year) all-cause mortality after TAVI. Pooled analyses demonstrated associations of high-baseline CRP levels with a marginal, but statistically nonsignificant increase in early mortality (pooled OR/HR per SD increase in CRP levels, 2.72; P = .09 and pooled OR/HR for high vs low CRP levels, 3.32; P = .07) and a statistically significant increase in midterm mortality after TAVI (pooled OR/HR per SD increase in CRP levels, 1.45; P < .0001 and pooled OR/HR for high vs low CRP levels, 1.78; P < .00001). Excluding HRs for high-sensitivity CRP, combining ORs/HRs of 1-year mortality, pooling HRs of ≥2-year mortality, and combining adjusted HRs did not alter the primary results. CONCLUSION: High-baseline CRP levels may predict increased midterm, but not early, mortality after TAVI.

Baseline left ventricular diastolic dysfunction affects midterm mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preprocedural left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction impairs midterm mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available evidence. METHODS: We identified all studies investigating impact of preprocedural severity of LV diastolic dysfunction on midterm (≥1-year) all-cause mortality after TAVI for patients with AS through a search of databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) until September 2019. From each study, we extracted an adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard ratio (HR) of midterm mortality. We pooled study-specific estimates in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten eligible studies with a total of 2380 patients with AS undergoing TAVI were identified. In accordance with pooled analyses, higher-grade preprocedural LV diastolic dysfunction was associated with significantly worse midterm all-cause mortality after TAVI compared to lower-grade dysfunction (HR for grade II vs I, 1.15; P = .002; HR for grade III vs I, 1.35; P = .001; HR for grade III vs II; 1.16, P = .002; HR for grade II-III vs I, II-III vs 0-I, or III vs I-II, 1.34; P < .00001 [primary meta-analysis]; HR per grade, 1.16; P = .003). No funnel plot asymmetry for the primary meta-analysis (for grade II-III vs I, II-III vs 0-I, or III vs I-II) was identified, which probably indicated no publication bias (P = .381 by the linear-regression test). CONCLUSION: Higher-grade preprocedural LV diastolic dysfunction was associated with worse midterm all-cause mortality after TAVI for patients with AS compared to lower-grade dysfunction.

Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation.

AIM: To assess outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for pure native aortic regurgitation (AR) and to evaluate whether 30-day all-cause mortality is modulated by patient characteristics, we performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression of currently available studies. METHOD: Studies enrolling ≥20 patients undergoing TAVI for AR were considered for inclusion. Study-specific estimates (incidence rates of outcomes) were combined using one-group meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Subgroup meta-analysis of studies exclusively using early-generation devices (EGD) and new-generation devices (NGD) and stepwise random-effects multivariate meta-regression were also performed. RESULTS: The search identified 11 eligible studies including a total of 911 patients undergoing TAVI for AR. Pooled analysis demonstrated an incidence of device success of 80.4% (NGD 90.2%, EGD 67.2%; p < 0.001), moderate or higher paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) of 7.4% (NGD 3.4%, EGD 17.3%; p < 0.001), 30-day all-cause mortality of 9.5% (NGD 6.1%, EGD 14.7%; p < 0.001), mid-term (4 mo - 1 yr) all-cause mortality of 18.8% (NGD 11.8%, EGD 32.2%; p < 0.001), life-threatening/major bleeding complications (BC) 5.7% (NGD 3.5%, EGD 12.4%; p = 0.015), and major vascular complications (MVC) of 3.9% (NGD 3.0%, EGD 6.2%; p = 0.041). All coefficients in the multivariate meta-regression adjusting simultaneously for the proportion of diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arterial disease, concomitant moderate or higher mitral regurgitation, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (with significant coefficients in the univariate meta-regression) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty (30)-day all-cause mortality after TAVI for AR was high (9.5%) with a high incidence of moderate or higher PAR (7.4%). Compared with EGD, NGD was associated with significantly higher device success rates and significantly lower rates of second-valve deployment, moderate or higher PAR, 30-day/mid-term all-cause mortality, serious BC, and MVC.

Impact of concurrent tricuspid regurgitation on mortality after transcatheter aortic-valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with increased mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available studies. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through May 2018. We included comparative or cohort studies enrolling patients with AS undergoing TAVI and reporting early (in-hospital or 30-day) and late (including early) all-cause mortality in patients stratified by baseline TR grade. An odds ratio (OR) of early mortality and a hazard ratio (HR) of late mortality with its 95% CI for significant versus non-significant (typically, ≥moderate versus

Network meta-analysis of new-generation valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

To comprehensively compare and rank new-generation valves (NGVs) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of all eligible comparative studies. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through September 2018. We included all studies comparing 4 NGVs (ACURATE, Evolut R, Lotus, and SAPIEN 3) and an early generation valve (CoreValve) as the reference transcatheter heart valve (THV) each other and reporting at least one of postprocedural incidence of all-cause death, ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), and new permanent pacemaker implantation (PMI). To compare different THVs, a random-effects restricted-maximum-likelihood NMA based on a frequentist framework for indirect and mixed comparisons was used. Using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each THV was estimated and the hierarchy of competing THVs was obtained. We identified 29 eligible studies enrolling a total of 17,817 patients. In accordance with the estimated SUCRA probability, SAPIEN 3 was the best effective for a reduction in death (80.6%) and the second best for decreased ≥ moderate AR (74.4%) and PMI (74.1%) compared with the other THVs. Lotus was ranked the best for a reduction in ≥ moderate AR (94.5%;), whereas the worst for decreased PMI (1.2%) and the second worst for a reduction in mortality (38.6%). ACURATE was the best for decreased PMI (99.2%) and the second best for a reduction in mortality (77.9%). As a whole, SAPIEN 3 may be the best effective NGV among the 4 examined NGVs (ACURATE, Evolut R, Lotus, and SAPIEN 3).

A meta-analysis of impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether concomitant mitral stenosis (MS) impairs outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available evidence. METHODS: To identify all observational comparative studies of outcomes after TAVI for AS in patients with MS vs patients with no-MS, we searched databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) using web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID). Studies meeting the following criteria were included; the design was an observational study; the study population was patients undergoing TAVI for AS; outcomes in patients with MS were compared with those in patients with no-MS. Study-specific estimates were then pooled using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic odds and hazard ratios in the random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified six eligible studies including 111 621 patients undergoing TAVI. In pooled analyses, postprocedural incidence of ≥ moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) (P = .02), early all-cause mortality (P = .008), early incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) (P = .01), and midterm all-cause mortality (P = .03) after TAVI were significantly higher in patients with MS than in patients with no-MS. There were no significant differences in early incidence of stroke, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and new permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI between patients with MS and patients with no-MS. When the study for mitral annular calcification was excluded in the pooled analyses, no results except for MI were substantially altered but the significance for early incidence of MI disappeared (P = .10). CONCLUSION: Postprocedural incidence of ≥ moderate PAR, early all-cause mortality, early incidence of MI, and midterm all-cause mortality after TAVI are higher in patients with MS than in patients with no-MS.

A meta-analysis of valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis of transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) for deteriorated bioprosthetic valves (valve-in-valve [VIV]-TMVI) and/or failed annuloplasty rings (valve-in-ring [VIR]-TMVI), comparing observed early (30-day) mortality with predicted operative mortality. BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether VIV/VIR-TMVI reduces mortality as compared with redo MVS. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched current through 24 July 2018 using Web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID) to identify studies including ≥10 patients undergoing VIV/VIR-TMVI. For each study, data regarding observed 30-day mortality and predicted operative mortality (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality [STS-PROM]) were used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study-specific estimates were combined using the inverse variance-weighted average of logarithmic RRs in the random-effects model. One-group meta-analyses of 30-day/late (including 30-day) mortality rates were also performed in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 270 potentially relevant articles screened initially, 17 eligible studies including a total of 1017 patients undergoing VIV/VIR-TMVI were identified. In all but four studies, the STS-PROM was available and varied from 7.7% to 22.0% (weighted mean, 11.5%). Pooled analyses of all VIV/VIR-TMVI studies demonstrated the 30-day mortality rate of 5.4% (95%CI, 4.0-6.8%), the midterm (1- to 5-year) mortality rate of 13.7% (95%CI, 9.0-18.5%), and significantly lower observed 30-day mortality than predicted operative mortality (RR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.49-0.91; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VIV/VIR-TMVI brought about relatively low early and midterm (1- to 5-year) mortality, and observed 30-day mortality was significantly lower than predicted operative mortality.

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for mitral regurgitation-A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to determine the outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through April 2018 using Web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID) to identify single-arm observational (case series) studies of TMVR enrolling ≥5 patients with MR. For each study, data regarding observed 30-day mortality and predicted operative mortality (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality) were used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study-specific estimates were combined using the inverse variance-weighted average of logarithmic RRs in the random-effects model. One-group meta-analyses of 30-day and >30-day (including 30-day) mortality were also performed in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 222 potentially relevant articles screened initially, nine eligible studies enrolling a total of 146 patients with MR undergoing TMVR were identified. In all but two studies, STS-PROM was available and varied from 3.3% to 15.4% (arithmetic mean, 7.6%). Pooled analyses demonstrated 30-day mortality of 20.4% (95%CI, 9.6-31.2%), >30-day mortality of 32.0% (95%CI, 19.8-44.2%), and non-significantly higher observed 30-day mortality than predicted operative mortality (RR, 1.70; 95%CI, 0.85-3.42; P = 0.14). There was no evidence of significant publication bias. CONCLUSION: TMVR for patients with MR results in increased early and late mortality.

A meta-analysis of ≥5-year mortality in randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) increases long-term mortality, by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of off-pump versus on-pump CABG with ≥5-year follow-up. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through July 2018. Hazard, risk, or odds ratios (HRs, RRs, or ORs) of long-term (≥5-year) mortality for off-pump versus on-pump CABG were extracted from each individual trial. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic HRs in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Our search identified eight medium- to large-size RCTs at low risk of bias with long-term follow-up of off-pump versus on-pump CABG enrolling a total of 8780 patients. Combining four RCTs reporting actual HRs generated a statistically significant result favoring on-pump CABG (HR, 1.21; P = 0.02). A pooled analysis of all eight RCTs demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mortality with off-pump CABG (HR/RR, 1.19; P = 0.01). There was no evidence of significant publication bias in the meta-analysis of all eight RCTs. In a sensitivity analysis, extracting RRs or ORs from all eight RCTs and pooling them demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mortality with off-pump CABG (RR, 1.17; P = 0.01; OR, 1.20; P = 0.007). Eliminating 2 RRs and combining six HRs still generated a statistically significant result favoring on-pump CABG (HR, 1.19; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG increases long-term (≥5-year) mortality compared with on-pump CABG.

Meta-analysis of impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) prescription is associated with better survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we performed the first meta-analysis of currently available studies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: To identify all studies reporting impact of RASI prescription on survival after TAVI, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, etc. through October 2019. We extracted adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard ratios (HRs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) of midterm (up to ≥6-month) all-cause mortality for RASI prescription from each study and combined study-specific estimates using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic HRs in the random-effects model. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 13 eligible studies with a total of 26,132 TAVI patients and included them in the present meta-analysis. None was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were observational studies comparing patients with versus without RASI prescription (including 3 propensity score matched studies), and 8 were observational studies investigating RASI prescription as one of covariates. The primary meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated that RASI prescription was associated with significantly lower midterm mortality (HR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.92; P=0.0002). Although we identified significant funnel plot asymmetry (P=0.036 by the rank correlation test) suggesting publication bias, correcting for it using the trim-and-fill method did not substantially alter the result favoring RASI prescription (corrected HR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: RASI prescription may be associated with better midterm survival after TAVI.

Meta-analysis of propensity matched studies of robotic versus conventional mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: To compare early outcomes after robotic versus conventional mitral valve surgery (R-MVS versus C-MVS), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available propensity score matched (PSM) studies. METHODS: To identify all PSM studies of R-MVS versus C-MVS, PubMed and Web of Science were searched thorough November 2018 using the terms of robotic or robot, mitral, and propensity. Inclusion criteria were PSM studies of isolated R-MVS versus C-MVS. Odds ratios of dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data were generated for each study and combined in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 7 PSM studies of R-MVS versus C-MVS enrolling a total of 3764 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (p < 0.00001) and cross-clamp time (p = 0.004) in R-MVS than C-MVS. However, intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.0005) and hospital stay (p < 0.0001) was significantly shorter; and incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (p = 0.03), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.048), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (p = 0.01) was significantly less frequent after R-MVS than C-MVS. There was no significant difference in incidence of reoperation for bleeding and valve dysfunction, ≥moderate mitral regurgitation, renal failure, dialysis, pneumonia, stroke, cardiac arrest, and all-cause death (p = 0.27) between R-MVS and C-MVS. CONCLUSIONS: ICU/hospital stay was shorter and RBC transfusion/prolonged ventilation/AF was less frequent after R-MVS than C-MVS despite longer CPB and cross-clamp time in R-MVS than C-MVS. The other early outcomes including all-cause mortality were similarly frequent after R-MVS and C-MVS.

A meta-analysis of ≥5-year mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether long-term survival is superior following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) than following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We performed a meta-analysis of mortality with ≥5-year follow-up in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies of TAVI versus SAVR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through March 2019. Eligible studies were RCTs or PSM studies of TAVI versus SAVR enrolling patients with severe aortic stenosis and reporting all-cause mortality with ≥5-year follow-up as an outcome. A hazard ratio of mortality for TAVI versus SAVR was extracted from each individual study. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Our search identified 3 RCTs and 7 PSM studies enrolling 5498 patients. A pooled analysis of all 10 studies demonstrated a statistically significant 38% increase in mortality with TAVI relative to SAVR. A subgroup meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between TAVI and AVR in RCTs and a statistically significant 68% increase with TAVI relative to SAVR in PSM studies. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a meta-analysis of 7 PSM studies, TAVI is associated with greater all-cause mortality with ≥5-year follow-up than SAVR. However, another meta-analysis of 3 RCTs suggests no difference in mortality between TAVI and SAVR.

Matrix metalloproteinases and acute aortic dissection: Et Tu, Brute?

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the present evidence for the association of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) with acute aortic dissection (AAD), we performed the first meta-analysis of all currently available case-control studies comparing circulating MMP levels between AAD patients and control subjects. METHODS: To identify all studies investigating the levels of circulating MMPs in AAD patients, PubMed and Web of Science were searched up to July 2019. The levels of MMPs in AAD patients and control subjects were extracted from each study, and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) in MMP levels were generated. The study-specific estimates were combined in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Twelve studies enrolling a total of 458 AAD patients and 711 control subjects were identified and included. Pooled analyses demonstrated no significant differences in MMP-1 (4 studies; P = 0.21), MMP-2 (5 studies; P = 0.62) and MMP-3 levels (2 studies; P = 0.94) between AAD patients and control subjects; and significantly higher MMP-8 (2 studies; SMD 2.11; P = 0.020), MMP-9 (9 studies; SMD 1.54; P < 0.001) and MMP-12 levels (2 studies; SMD 1.33; P < 0.001) in AAD patients than in control subjects. CONCLUSION: High circulating MMP-9 levels are associated with AAD, and MMP-8 and MMP-12 levels may be related to AAD.

Echocardiographic outcomes from seven randomized trials of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

AIMS: We performed meta-analyses of echocardiographic outcomes, including postprocedural aortic valve area (AVA), aortic valve mean pressure gradient (MPG), and paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR), exclusively from all currently available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: To identify all RCTs providing echocardiographic outcomes (AVA, MPG, and PAR) up to 2 years after TAVI versus SAVR, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through June 2019. Mean differences in AVA (and MPG) between the TAVI and SAVR groups and odds (or hazard) ratios of at least moderate PAR for TAVI versus SAVR were pooled using the random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified seven eligible RCTs. At 30 days (P = 0.004), 1 year (P = 0.006), and 2 years (P = 0.03), AVA was significantly larger after TAVI than after SAVR. After TAVI than after SAVR, MPG was significantly lower at 30 days (P = 0.03) and 2 years (P = 0.01), and nonsignificantly lower at 1 year (P = 0.06). At 30 days (P < 0.00001), 1 year (P < 0.00001), and 2 years (P < 0.00001), incidence of at least moderate PAR was significantly greater after TAVI than after SAVR. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the present meta-analyses of all the seven currently available RCTs, AVA is larger, MPG is lower, and incidence of at least moderate PAR is greater 30 days, 1 and 2 years after TAVI than after SAVR.

Meta-analysis of impact of troponins on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether troponin (Tn) can predict mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available studies investigating impact of baseline and postprocedural Tn. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through April 2019 using PubMed and OVID. Studies considered for inclusion met the following criteria: the study investigating impact of baseline and postprocedural Tn on mortality; the study population was patients undergoing TAVI for aortic stenosis (AS); outcomes included early (30-day or in-hospital)/late (including early) mortality. For each study, data regarding early/late mortality in both high and low (defined in each study) level of baseline/postprocedural Tn groups were used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or reported ORs and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were directly extracted. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs/HRs in the random-effects model. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 19 eligible studies including a total of 7555 patients undergoing TAVI. Pooled analyses demonstrated associations of high levels of baseline Tn with statistically significant increases in both 30-day (P=0.002) and midterm mortality (P<0.00001), no correlation of high postprocedural Tn with 30-day mortality (P=0.13), and an association of high postprocedural Tn with a statistically significant increase in midterm mortality (P=0.002). High levels of baseline/postprocedural TnT predicted statistically significant increases in both 30-day (P=0.002/<0.0001) and midterm mortality (P<0.00001/0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Both baseline and postprocedural Tn, especially TnT, may predict mortality after TAVI for AS.