Education without walls: Using a street medicine program to provide real-world interprofessional learning.

Interprofessional education (IPE) is a core component of the curricula for many healthcare and social work training programs and has been shown to increase student self-efficacy, communication skills, and attitudes toward other professions. Street medicine programs expand options for teaching interprofessional, team-based care of vulnerable populations, such as those experiencing homelessness. Street Medicine Phoenix is an interprofessional team of health professions students and faculty that provides outreach to Phoenix's homeless population. This study demonstrates the impact of volunteering in our street medicine program on the perceived development of interprofessional skills and behaviors. Volunteer teams, with representatives from medicine, nursing, social work, physical therapy, occupational therapy, public health, and undergraduate studies, completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) before and after semester-long, monthly outreach events. Results demonstrate statistically significant improvements in overall ICCAS scores for all volunteers, but there was no relationship between number of shifts completed and ICCAS score improvement. Based on these findings, street medicine programs could be considered as an option for providing interprofessional learning to students in healthcare and social work degree programs. Street medicine outreach can supplement didactic and simulation skill-building activities in the IPE curricula with point of care, real-world experiential learning.

Essential integrated behavioral health care skills for primary care providers: A Delphi study.

INTRODUCTION: Workforce development is a vital process for advancing the field of integrated behavioral health in primary care (IBHPC) and depends on the development of job-specific skills that meet the needs of patients and other team members. Job-specific skills guide both university- and worksite-based training programs in preparing future cohorts of health care professionals in IBHPC; however, there are no extant training criteria for nontrainee primary care providers. METHOD: A multiround survey using a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Participants were recruited from a large national research network, university alumni and community health center partners. Participants included allopathic and osteopathic physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners serving as primary care providers in a variety of IBHPC settings. In the survey, participants were instructed to categorize 22 skills as "Essential," "Compatible," or "Irrelevant" for IBHPC practice. Categorized responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comments were analyzed using a modified thematic analysis method. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were recruited for the study, with 43 participating in round 1, 38 participating in round 2, and 36 participating in round 3. After 3 rounds, 19 skills received at least 80% consensus as "Essential" and 22 received at least 50% consensus as "Essential." Comment themes revealed participants were overall agreeable with skills, but had concerns about role, training, and time constraints. DISCUSSION: Primary care providers can prepare for and enhance IBHPC practice by developing skills identified as essential. Employers can adapt this skill list for efforts related to recruiting, hiring, and onboarding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).