Socio-ecological perspective on factors influencing acute recovery of younger stroke survivors: A mixed methods study.

AIMS: Stroke is affecting an increasing number of young and middle-aged adults. Given the substantial diversion from anticipated life trajectories that younger stroke survivors experience as a result of their stroke deficits, their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is likely to be negatively impacted during the immediate post-acute recovery period. The aim of this study was to generate a comprehensive understanding of the influences on HRQOL and acute recovery during the first three months following stroke for younger adults using a socio-ecological perspective. DESIGN: Longitudinal, convergent mixed methods design. METHODS: HRQOL survey data, assessed using the Patient Generated Index (N = 31), and qualitative interview data about survivors' recovery experiences (N = 20) were collected. Simple linear regression and effect size results were integrated with themes and sub-themes identified from conventional content analysis using joint data displays. RESULTS: Depression and fatigue negatively affected recovery at the individual level. At the family and societal level, family functioning, social support including being married, having insurance, working, adequate income and being unemployed post-stroke all positively impacted recovery. Qualitative findings revealed determination, coping, and accessing healthcare to positively affect recovery though a meta-inference could not be drawn as no quantitative data addressed these concepts. CONCLUSION: A variety of factors intersecting across socio-ecological levels were perceived by young stroke survivors to influence acute recovery experiences and outcomes. IMPACT: This study identified individual-, family- and societal-level factors in younger adults' environments that may affect the acute stroke recovery experience. Findings underscore the need for research and clinical approaches that consider environmental factors at multiple levels of influence when supporting stroke recovery for younger adults.

Recovery experiences of younger stroke survivors who are parents: A qualitative content analysis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experience of parenting for younger stroke survivors (aged 18 to 64 years at the time of the stroke). BACKGROUND: Stroke among younger adults increased 43% between 2000 and 2010. The social, emotional and physical functioning of younger adults affects multiple aspects of their lives including parenting. There is limited research on the experience of parenting after stroke. DESIGN: This is a qualitative descriptive study. METHODS: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 10 younger adults who were actively parenting children under the age of 18 years at the time of stroke. Conventional content analysis was used to analyse the data. We report the methods and results using the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: Impairments from stroke disrupted participants' identity, relationships and roles as a parent. The degree to which parenting abilities and behaviours were affected by stroke was contingent upon the type and severity of impairments as well as the children's age. Participants also observed emotional and behavioural changes in their children in response to their stroke. Support from family, friends, healthcare providers and children's school/day care was crucial to participants throughout their stroke recovery. Two major themes emerged: (a) finding a new normal; and (b) support for parenting post-stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Findings enable a deeper understanding of the distinct parenting challenges younger stroke survivors face and can inform future research on this population. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Study findings highlight the need for continual and tailored follow-up by nurses and other allied healthcare professionals to decrease the difficulty stroke survivors experience when trying to resume their role as parents.

Sex and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Within-Stay Readmissions During Inpatient Rehabilitation Among Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the association of sex and race/ethnicity with acute hospital readmissions ("within-stay readmissions") during inpatient rehabilitation facility care versus patients discharged home without a within-stay readmission among traumatic brain injury patients. DESIGN: The study used a secondary analysis ( N = 210,440) of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation data using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Within-stay readmissions occurred for 11.79% of female and 11.77% of male traumatic brain injury patients. Sex-specific models identified insurance, comorbidities, and complications factored differently in likelihood of within-stay readmissions among female than male patients but association of all other factors were similar per group. Within-stay readmissions differences were more pronounced by race/ethnicity: White, 11.63%; Black, 11.32%; Hispanic/Latino, 9.78%; and other, 10.61%. Descriptive bivariate analysis identified racial/ethnic patients with within-stay readmissions had greater days from traumatic brain injury to inpatient rehabilitation facility admission (White, 17.66; Black, 21.70; Hispanic/Latino, 23.81; other, 20.66) and lower admission cognitive and motor function. Factors differed across models predicting within-stay readmissions for race/ethnic groups; age, admission motor and cognitive function, complications, and length of stay were consistent across groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates disparities by race/ethnicity for inpatient rehabilitation facility within-stay readmissions among traumatic brain injury patients and factors predictive of this potentially preventable outcome by sex and race/ethnicity. Findings could inform care planning and quality improvement efforts for TBI patients.