RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in etiology and outcomes of neonatal liver failure (NLF) over 30 years retrospectively at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: Inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study were babies presenting at a chronological age of ≤ 28 days between 1991 and 2020 with prothrombin time (PT) ≥ 20 seconds and biochemical liver injury. Demographics, etiology, laboratory investigations, need for extrahepatic organ support, acute kidney injury (AKI), and intervention with liver transplant (LT) were recorded. Survival outcomes were measured as discharge from the hospital alive with native liver or LT. The study period was stratified into three 10-year blocks. Trends were analyzed for hospital admissions, etiology, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: 126 babies met the NLF criteria. Admissions to the hospital increased from 21 in 1991-2000 to 65 in 2011-2020. An increasing trend in infectious and metabolic causes, while a decreasing trend in indeterminate etiology, was noted. Survival with native liver improved from 23.8% in 1991-2000 to 55.4% in 2011-20 (p=0.021), and mortality reduced from 52.4 % to 35.4% during the same periods (p=0.213). Twenty-three (18.2 %) neonates received LT. Post-LT survival outcomes were 100% for gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD), 66.6 % in the indeterminate group, and 25% for herpes simplex virus (HSV). Specific etiologies (GALD, OR=0.07 [0-0.77, p=0.048]), presence of acute kidney injury (OR= 6.22 [1.45, 29.38, p=0.015]) and need for inotropes (OR=6.22 [1.45, 29.38, p=0.028}) influenced mortality in multivariable logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In the last 30 years, advances in diagnosis, treatment, and increasing experience with LT have improved survival in NLF.
RESUMO
In 2022, there were global reports of increased numbers of acute hepatitis not explained by hepatitis A-E virus infection in children. This manuscript summarises histopathology results from 20 patients in the United Kingdom who underwent liver transplant or had a liver biopsy as part of aetiological investigations. All available histopathological samples were reviewed centrally as part of the outbreak investigation. A working group comprised of infection specialists, hepatologists and histopathologists met virtually to review the cases, presentation, investigations and histopathology. All 20 liver samples had evidence of inflammation without significant interface activity, and submassive confluent pan-lobular or multilobular hepatocellular necrosis. Overall, the predominant histopathological findings were of acute nonspecific hepatitis with submassive hepatic necrosis and central vein perivenulitis and endothelitis. Histopathological findings were a poor indicator of aetiology.
Assuntos
Hepatite , Hepatopatias , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Criança , Fígado/patologia , Hepatite/patologia , Hepatopatias/patologia , BiópsiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders, the most prevalent being BSEP deficiency, resulting in disrupted bile formation, cholestasis, and pruritus. Building on a previous phase 2 study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maralixibat-an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor-in participants with all types of PFIC. METHODS: MARCH-PFIC was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in 29 community and hospital centres across 16 countries in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. We recruited participants aged 1-17 years with PFIC with persistent pruritus (>6 months; average of ≥1·5 on morning Itch-Reported Outcome [Observer; ItchRO(Obs)] during the last 4 weeks of screening) and biochemical abnormalities or pathological evidence of progressive liver disease, or both. We defined three analysis cohorts. The BSEP (or primary) cohort included only those with biallelic, non-truncated BSEP deficiency without low or fluctuating serum bile acids or previous biliary surgery. The all-PFIC cohort combined the BSEP cohort with participants with biallelic FIC1, MDR3, TJP2, or MYO5B deficiencies without previous surgery but regardless of bile acids. The full cohort had no exclusions. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral maralixibat (starting dose 142·5 µg/kg, then escalated to 570 µg/kg) or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and weeks 15-26 in the BSEP cohort. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in total serum bile acids between baseline and the average of weeks 18, 22, and 26 in the BSEP cohort. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all those randomly assigned) and safety analyses were done in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03905330, and EudraCT, 2019-001211-22. FINDINGS: Between July 9, 2019, and March 4, 2022, 125 patients were screened, of whom 93 were randomly assigned to maralixibat (n=47; 14 in the BSEP cohort and 33 in the all-PFIC cohort) or placebo (n=46; 17 in the BSEP cohort and 31 in the all-PFIC cohort), received at least one dose of study drug, and were included in the intention-to-treat and safety populations. The median age was 3·0 years (IQR 2·0-7·0) and 51 (55%) of 93 participants were female and 42 (45%) were male. In the BSEP cohort, least-squares mean change from baseline in morning ItchRO(Obs) was -1·7 (95% CI -2·3 to -1·2) with maralixibat versus -0·6 (-1·1 to -0·1) with placebo, with a significant between-group difference of -1·1 (95% CI -1·8 to -0·3; p=0·0063). Least-squares mean change from baseline in total serum bile acids was -176 µmol/L (95% CI -257 to -94) for maralixibat versus 11 µmol/L (-58 to 80) for placebo, also representing a significant difference of -187 µmol/L (95% CI -293 to -80; p=0·0013). The most common adverse event was diarrhoea (27 [57%] of 47 patients on maralixibat vs nine [20%] of 46 patients on placebo; all mild or moderate and mostly transient). There were five (11%) participants with serious treatment-emergent adverse events in the maralixibat group versus three (7%) in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Maralixibat improved pruritus and predictors of native liver survival in PFIC (eg, serum bile acids). Maralixibat represents a non-surgical, pharmacological option to interrupt the enterohepatic circulation and improve the standard of care in patients with PFIC. FUNDING: Mirum Pharmaceuticals.