Return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an audit of employment outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Ayelsbury, UK. METHODS: Employment outcomes were obtained from the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC), for all patients admitted to the unit between February 2008 and October 2014. NAC1 is completed within 4 weeks post-mobilisation and NAC2 upon the patient moving to the pre-discharge ward. Data from 362 participants were analysed for return-to-work intentions, by gender, age and injury severity. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the sample population was employed at the time of their injury. At NAC1, 22.4% of individuals had made plans to return to work, whereas 44.2% had not; at NAC2, 34.3% had made plans to return to work and 31.2% had not. This difference was found to be statistically significant. There were significant differences in return-to-work intentions by injury severity at NAC1 but not NAC2, and by age group at NAC2 but not NAC1. CONCLUSION: Less than half of those employed at the time of their injury had made plans to return to work before their discharge from the unit. The low proportion of individuals with SCI returning to work--just one in three--is concerning in view of the lost health and psychosocial benefits, and requires greater prominence during rehabilitation. Future research into effective employment interventions to improve employment outcomes in this population is required.

An audit of demographics and rehabilitation outcomes in non-traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To classify specific causes of injury in a cohort of non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) patients, with the aim of exploring whether there are differences in demographics or rehabilitation outcomes depending on the cause of NTSCI. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit. METHODS: Patients admitted to the unit with a non-traumatic SCI between July 2008 and April 2015 were considered for this study. Demographic information and rehabilitation outcomes were obtained from the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). NAC1 is completed within 4 weeks post mobilisation and NAC2 upon the patient moving to the pre-discharge ward. Data were obtained for 265 patients. RESULTS: The most common causes were vertebral column degenerative disorders, infection and vascular disorders, which together accounted for 80% of all NTSCI in this sample. Patients with vertebral column degenerative disorders were less likely to have a complete injury than patients with infections or vascular disorders. There were differences in rehabilitation outcomes on several domains of the NAC. Overall, patients with an SCI caused by an infection have the highest needs (more dependent), and patients with vertebral column degenerative disorders have the lowest needs (more independent). CONCLUSION: The relationship between non-traumatic cause of injury and rehabilitation outcomes may be mediated by severity of injury. Individuals with infection-related NTSCI are more likely to be complete, therefore, present more significant rehab needs, and lower rehabilitation outcomes particularly in physical health, activities of daily living and bowel management domains. This supports previous findings of Kay et al. and provides a possible explanation for the differences. This further informs future interventions.

Ethnicity and rehabilitation outcomes: the Needs Assessment Checklist.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with matched samples. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether significant differences in rehabilitation outcomes exist between different ethnic groups, using the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). SETTINGS: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit (National Spinal Injuries Centre), Stoke Mandeville Hospital, UK. METHODS: Rehabilitation outcomes and demographic information were obtained from the NAC. Data on 461 individuals were included in the study. Analysis of variance was employed to investigate differences in rehabilitation outcomes between various ethnic groups, across both the whole cohort and matched samples. RESULTS: Significant differences were evident across the different rehabilitation domains when ethnicity was examined, in particular within the domains of physical healthcare and psychological well-being. Within the unmatched data set, significant differences were found to exist in 3 of the 10 rehabilitation domains, and with the matched data set within 4 of the 10 domains. The results indicated that the cohort as a whole made significant improvements from the first to the second NAC within all rehabilitation domains. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that ethnicity may have an impact on rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with spinal cord injury. Further investigation is needed to explore the nature of this relationship, and the future role of targeted interventions focusing on improving rehabilitation outcomes within the domains of physical and psychological care, in particular for individuals from different ethnic backgrounds.