Static Non-articulating Knee Spacers Are Associated with a High Degree of Morbidity in Challenging Clinical Scenarios.

The morbidity associated with the use of static non-articulating knee spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in challenging clinical scenarios has not been well described. From 2011-2019, 63 molded block static spacers were utilized at two academic institutions for the treatment of PJI with associated severe soft tissue compromise (59%), collateral ligament deficiency (49%), extensor mechanism compromise (48%), or type 3 bone defects (44%). Complications and outcomes were assessed. Complications with the use of static spacers were common and included further bone loss (46%), spacer migration (16%), extensor mechanism compromise (16%), cast or related soft tissue injuries (16%), fracture (13%), and spacer breakage (3%). Ultimately, 22% of patients underwent amputation. Patient variables such as age and body mass index were not associated with outcomes. Static knee spacers are associated with substantial morbidity in challenging clinical scenarios and alternatives may need to be considered. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):122-126, 2023).

Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Increased for Hospitals but Not for Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: With increases in total hip arthroplasty procedures the need for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has increased as well. This study aims to analyze the trends in hospital charges and payments relative to corresponding surgeon charges and payments in a Medicare population for rTHA for aseptic revisions, stage 1 and stage 2 revisions. METHODS: The 5% Medicare sample database was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to 4449 patients undergoing aseptic revision, 517 for stage 1 revision, and 300 for stage 2 revision in between the years 2004 and 2014. Two values were calculated: (1) the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges (CM) and (2) the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments (PM). Year-to-year variation and trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), CM, and PM were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean CCI for aseptic revisions and stage 1 revisions did not significantly change (P < .088 and P < .063). The CCI slightly increased for stage 2 revisions (P < .04). The mean LOS decreased significantly over time in all 3 procedure types. The CM increased by 39% (P < .02) in aseptic revisions, 109% in stage 1 revisions (P < .001) but did not significantly change in stage 2 revisions (P < .877). PM for aseptic revisions increased around 103% (P < .001), 107% for stage 1 revisions (P < .001), and 9.7% for stage 2 revisions (P < .176). CONCLUSION: Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have increased substantially for THA aseptic revisions, stage 1 revisions, and stage 2 revisions despite stable patient complexity and decreasing LOS.

Outcomes Following Revision Joint Arthroplasty Among Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) dependence is known to impact the integrity of bone and has long been associated with metabolic bone disease and other adverse events postoperatively. The aim of this study is to analyze postoperative outcomes following revision hip and knee arthroplasty in hemodialysis-dependent (HDD) patients and to characterize the common indications for revision procedures among this patient population. METHODS: A total of 1779 HDD patients who underwent a revision joint arthroplasty (930 revision total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 849 revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]) between 2005 and 2014 were identified from a retrospective database review. Our resulting study groups of revision TKA and THA HDD patients were compared to their respective matched control groups for hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day mean total cost, hospital readmission, and other major medical and surgical complications. RESULTS: HD was significantly associated with increased LOS (7.7 ± 8.3 vs 4.8 ± 4.5; P < .001), mean 90-day total cost ($47,478 ± $33,413 vs $24,286 ± $21,472; P < .001), hospital readmission (odds ratio [OR], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-2.58; P < .001), septicemia (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.70-3.74; P < .001), postoperative infection (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.98; P < .001), and mortality (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 3.12-5.06; P < .001) following revision TKA. Among revision THA patients, HD was associated with increased LOS (9.4 ± 9.5 vs 5.7 ± 5.7; P < .001), mean 90-day total cost ($40,182 ± $27,082 vs $26,519 ± $22,856; P < .001), hospital readmission (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.02-2.68; P < .001), septicemia (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 3.05-4.27; P < .001), and mortality (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 2.86-4.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: HD remains a significant risk factor for increased LOS, mean total cost, hospital readmission, septicemia, and mortality following revision joint arthroplasty.

Preoperative Pain Management: Is Tramadol a Safe Alternative to Traditional Opioids Before Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use has been associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher rates of prolonged opioid use following lower extremity arthroplasty. Tramadol has been recommended for management of osteoarthritis-related pain; however, outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients taking tramadol in the preoperative period have not been well described. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of preoperative tramadol use on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective THA. METHODS: A total of 5304 patients who underwent primary THA for degenerative hip pathology from 2008 to 2014 were identified using the Humana Claims Database. Patients were grouped by preoperative pain management modality into 3 mutually exclusive populations including tramadol, traditional opioid, or nonopioid only. A multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate all postsurgical outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Tramadol users had an increased risk of developing prolonged narcotic use (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; confidence interval [CI], 1.89-2.49; P < .001) following surgery compared to nonopioid-only users. When compared to traditional opioid use, tramadol use was associated with decreased risk of subsequent 90-day minor medical complications (OR, 0.75; CI, 0.62-0.90; P = .002), emergency department visits (OR, 0.70; CI, 0.57-0.85; P < .001), and prolonged narcotic use (OR, 0.43; CI, 0.37-0.49; P < .001). Traditional opioid use significantly increased length of stay by 0.20 days (P = .001) when compared to tramadol use. CONCLUSION: Preoperative tramadol use is associated with prolonged opioid use following THA but is not associated with other postoperative complications. Patients taking tramadol preoperatively appear to have a lower risk of postoperative complications compared to patients taking traditional opioids preoperatively.

Does Polycythemia Vera Increase Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Matched Control Cohort Study of 6932 Polycythemia Vera Patients.

BACKGROUND: There is sparsity of data on outcomes following joint arthroplasty among polycythemia vera (PV) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative outcomes following primary total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty among PV patients. METHODS: A retrospective Medicare database review identified 6932 PV patients who underwent a primary total joint arthroplasty (4643 TKAs and 2289 THAs) from 2006 to 2013. A comparison of hospital length of stay, mortality, and the diagnosis of surgical site infections (SSIs), stroke, myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and other postoperative complications was made between PV patients undergoing TKA and THA and their respective matched control groups. RESULTS: PV was significantly associated with increased rates of acute PE (2.3% vs 1.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.75), DVT (4.2% vs 3.6%; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.61, P < .001), postoperative hematoma (0.6% vs 0.4%; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.28), and SSI (4.5% vs 3.6%; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44, P = .002) following TKA. Among PV patients who underwent a primary THA, PV was significantly associated with increased rate of acute PE (1.9% vs 1.4%; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.88, P = .035), DVT (3.5% vs 2.6%; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.66, P = .035), postoperative hematoma (1.1% vs 0.6%; OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22-2.80), and 1-year mortality (2.2% vs 1.6%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, P = .016). CONCLUSION: PV was significantly associated with increased risk for DVT, PE, postoperative hematoma, SSI (TKA only), and 1-year mortality (THA only) following primary total joint arthroplasty.

Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries: experience of a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1%) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and "polytrauma" (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95% CI, 0.388-0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.

High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

BACKGROUND: Surgical gloves can be damaged during the course of a procedure, which can place the surgeon and patient at risk. Glove perforation may not always be readily apparent, and determining the risk factors for glove perforation can aid the surgeon in deciding when a glove change is advisable. Time of wear and needle sticks have been well studied; however, other mechanisms including mechanical stress from surgical equipment have had limited evaluation to date. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated the risk of glove perforation in gloves that were caught in a surgical rotatory device (such as drills and reamers). The aims of our study were (1) to determine the percentage of undetected microperforations after entanglement on a rotatory tool during orthopaedic procedures, (2) to determine which kinds of rotatory devices most commonly cause such microperforations, and (3) to assess whether time of wear had an effect on the risk of perforation. METHODS: From July 2014 to September 2015, 33 gloves were obtained from all orthopaedic subspecialties at our Level I trauma center if they were caught in a rotatory device greater than one revolution. Time of glove wear and location of the glove that was caught in a rotatory device were recorded. After an evaluation for macroperforations (≥ 5 mm), the gloves were evaluated for microperforations (< 5 mm) via the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) one-liter load test. Time of wear was compared among gloves with macroperforations, microperforations, and no perforations. RESULTS: The 33 gloves obtained came from 33 procedures. Seventeen of 33 (52 %) gloves had perforations. Seven of the 17 perforated gloves had macroperforations while 10 had microperforations. Eleven of 33 entanglements were caught by drills, nine by reamers, eight by K-wires, and the remaining five gloves were caught by various other instruments. Eight of 17 perforations were caused by drills, three by reamers, three by K-wires, and three by various other instruments. The average time of wear was 58 minutes which did not differ with pattern of glove damage. CONCLUSION: Surgical gloves caught in a rotatory power instrument are likely to have been perforated, regardless of the amount of time that they had been worn. Visual inspection appears to be an inadequate test of glove integrity. When a glove becomes entangled in a rotary instrument such as a drill, pin, or reamer, a surgeon should change the gloves regardless of whether he or she believes a perforation is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Higher cost of arthroplasty for hip fractures in patients transferred from outside hospitals vs primary emergency department presentation.

BACKGROUND: In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care. Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a financial risk on the hospitals that accept these patients. AIM: To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention. METHODS: A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture. Exclusion criteria included pathologic, periprosthetic, and fracture non-union. Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department, patients from skilled nursing facilities, and patients from an outside hospital. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria. 135 (60.54%) of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department, 58 patients (26.01%) were transferred from an outside hospital, and 30 patients (13.43%) were transferred from a SNF. Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization ($43302) compared to emergency department patients ($28875, P = 0.000) and SNF patients ($28282, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF. This is a strong argument for risk-adjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.

Corrections in alpha angle following two different operative approaches for CAM-type femoral acetabular impingement - Ganz surgical hip dislocation vs anterior mini-open.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a predisposing factor for secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint. The two extensively described impingement mechanisms of FAI are CAM and Pincer-type. Initially managed conservatively, operative intervention should be offered to the persistently symptomatic patient. The measurement of the alpha angle is considered a standard method of assessing the severity of pathology in Cam-type FAI on pre-operative plain radiographs. The radiological correction of the alpha angle has not been previously compared between different surgical approaches. We hypothesize that there is no difference in alpha angle correction between Ganz surgical hip dislocation and the anterior mini-open approach. AIM: To compare the magnitude of alpha angle correction achieved by using the Ganz surgical hip dislocation and the anterior mini-open approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective study assessing seventy-nine patients identified in a 5-year period. These patients had preoperative radiographic evidence of FAI and underwent surgery by a single surgeon at our institution, a tertiary care center. Patients with missing radiographic documentation, radiographs with insufficient quality which then precluded accurate measurement of the angle α, a diagnosed congenital condition, isolated type II pathology (Pincer), and history of prior surgery were excluded from the study. Either the Ganz surgical hip dislocation or the anterior mini open approach was used. Postoperative radiographic evaluation of the alpha angle between the two surgical methods was done and corrected for age and gender using two-sample t-tests and Chi-square analyses. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-seven males (mean age of 35.3, range 16-53) and 32 females (mean age 36.7, range 16-60) were enrolled. Forty-seven patients underwent the anterior mini-open approach, and 32 underwent the Ganz surgical hip dislocation. There were no significant differences in age between the two surgical groups or in pre- and post-operative alpha angles based on patient gender. The mean pre-operative alpha angle for the Ganz surgical hip dislocation group was 88.0 degrees (SD 12.3) and 99.4 degrees (SD 7.2) for the anterior mini-open group. Mean post-operative angles were 49.9 degrees (SD 4.3) for the Ganz surgical hip dislocation and 43.8 (SD 4.3) degrees for the anterior mini-open group. There was a statistically significant difference in patient's pre-operative and post-operative angles (P = 0.000) with both surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: Statistically significant decreases in alpha angle were noted for both surgical techniques, with larger decreases seen in the anterior mini-open group.