The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The 1995 Calman-Hine plan outlined radical reform of the UK's cancer services with the aim of improving outcomes and reducing inequalities in National Health Service cancer care. Its main recommendation was to concentrate care into the hands of site-specialist multidisciplinary teams. This study aimed to determine whether these teams improved processes and outcomes of care for breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed and treated with breast cancer in the Yorkshire region of the UK from 1995 to 2000 were identified within the Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service database. Changes in the use of breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery and 5-year survival were assessed among these patients in relation to their managing breast cancer team's degree of adherence to the manual of cancer service standards (which outlines the specification of the 'ideal' breast cancer team) and the extent of site specialisation of each team's surgeons. RESULTS: Variation was observed in the extent to which the breast cancer teams in Yorkshire had conformed to the Calman-Hine recommendations. Increases in adherence to the recommendations in the manual of cancer service standards were associated with a reduction in the use of breast-conserving surgery [odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-0.98, P < 0.01]. Increases in both surgical specialisation (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.00-1.55, P = 0.06) and adherence to the manual of cancer service standards (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.97-1.52, P = 0.05) were associated with the increased use of radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery. There was a trend towards improved 5-year survival (hazard ratio = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86-1.01, P = 0.10) in relation to increasing surgical site specialisation. All these effects were present after adjustment for the casemix factors of age, stage of disease, socio-economic background and year of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of implementation of the Calman-Hine report has been variable and, on the basis of limited clinical and organisational information available, its recommendations appear to be associated with improvements in processes and outcomes of care for breast cancer patients.

Do elderly people with lung cancer benefit from palliative radiotherapy?

The median age at diagnosis of patients with lung cancer is currently around 70 and is rising, yet the trials on which treatment is based included few elderly people. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 83 elderly patients (aged 75 and above) being treated with palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer, with a comparison group of 49 younger patients (aged 65 and under). Response to treatment was evaluated by patient-assessed symptom and quality of life scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its companion lung module LC17. This is to date the largest prospective study of elderly lung cancer patients in routine practice. We found no significant differences in response or toxicity between the two groups. Elderly people with lung cancer should be offered palliative radiotherapy the same as younger patients, with the same expectation of benefit.

The long term survival of rectal cancer patients following abdominoperineal and anterior resection: results of a population-based observational study.

AIMS: The surgical management of rectal cancer is not uniform. Both abdominoperineal (APR) and anterior resection (AR) are used in potentially curative surgery but there is no definitive evidence regarding comparative survival outcomes and no randomised controlled trials. We sought to determine if any differences in survival existed between patients who received AR or APR. In addition, we sought to determine how variations in surgical management relate to the degree of specialisation and caseload of the managing consultant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of population-based data collected by the Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service was undertaken. All patients (3521) diagnosed with rectal cancer in the former Yorkshire Regional Health Authority (population 3.6 million) between 1986 and 1994 who received either an APR or AR were included. Survival was assessed in relation to the surgical methods adopted. In addition, we determined whether the extent of specialisation of the managing consultant influenced the type of operation adopted. RESULTS: A Log Rank test, stratified for sex and age, showed a statistically significant 6.7% 5-year survival advantage for patients receiving AR (p=0.0064). AR was more likely to be performed by more specialist colorectal cancer surgeons (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This evidence suggests that the outcomes of the two main surgical procedures used in curative surgery for rectal cancer are different and that, when possible, AR should be the operation of choice. Our results show no indication of excess risk associated with this procedure compared with APR.

Increased incidence of renal parenchymal carcinoma in the Northern and Yorkshire region of England, 1978-1997.

Kidney cancer remains relatively rare, but incidence and mortality rates are reported to be rising steadily across the world. To determine if such increases were occurring in the UK, we examined the rates of incidence and mortality in different histological subtypes of kidney cancer in the Northern and Yorkshire region of England. Details of all 8741 cases diagnosed between 1978 and 1997 were extracted from the population-based Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry. For all types of tumour, both incidence and mortality rates increased over the study period. Overall age-standardised incidence rates increased by 86% for renal parenchymal carcinoma (RPC) (80% for males, 90% for females) from 2.8 to 5.2 cases per 100000 (3.8-6.8 male, 2.0-3.8 female). There were incidence increases in all age groups, all Carstairs index groups and in both urban and rural populations. Although increased incidental detection of kidney tumours by improved investigational techniques may account for some of this rise, we believe it unlikely that it accounts for all of the increase observed. Potential aetiological causes for the increased rates include hypertension, smoking, a diet lacking fruit and vegetables, analgesic use and, particularly, obesity.

Lung cancer: district active treatment rates affect survival.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study investigates variation in management and treatment of lung cancer patients and determines the impact of any variation in treatment on survival. DESIGN: A retrospective study of population based data held by the Northern & Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service (NYCRIS), comparing active treatment rates for lung cancer with survival by districts. SETTING The then 17 districts in Yorkshire and South Humber, England. PATIENTS: 22 654 patients registered with lung cancer between 1986 and 1994 and followed up until end of 1996. RESULTS: The overall rates of active treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) varied between districts from 37% to 56%. One year survival (with 95% CI) was significantly better in the districts with highest rates of active treatment 23% (22% to 24%) compared with 19% (17% to 20%) for those with lowest treatment rates. Non-small cell lung cancer patients (55%) in the districts with highest active treatment rates had an age adjusted relative risk of death during the follow up period, relative to risk of death in the districts with the lower treatment rates of 0.88 (0.83 to 0.92). Clinically diagnosed patients (34%) had an age adjusted RR of 0.92 (0.86 to 0.96). RR in small cell cancer (11%) was not significant. CONCLUSION: This study has shown wide variations in the rates of active treatment for lung cancer patients within districts across one large region of England. Active treatment was strongly associated with improved survival, especially in non-small cell lung cancer.

Psychological distress and concerns of elderly patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer.

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 83 elderly patients (aged 75 and above) being treated with palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer, with a comparison group of 49 younger patients (aged 65 and under). Psychological distress and concerns were measured before and after treatment using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a Concerns Checklist. Psychosocial morbidity was common, however, prevalence was similar in both age groups. There was a trend towards worsening of both anxiety and depression scores after treatment, but this did not reach statistical significance. Younger patients reported more concerns than the older group (median 12 vs 10) but this too was not statistically significant. Concerns about the illness and symptoms were more likely to have been addressed by the care team than were concerns about psychosocial issues such as the family and the future. People of all ages have similar concerns and levels of anxiety and depression whilst receiving palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Further research is needed to explore the use of screening tools, like those used in this study, to identify patients' difficulties and target interventions to improve their quality of life.

The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients.

The 1995 Calman-Hine plan outlined radical reform of the UK's cancer services with the aim of improving outcomes and reducing inequalities in NHS cancer care. Its main recommendation was to concentrate care into the hands of site-specialist, multi-disciplinary teams. This study aimed to determine if the implementation of Calman-Hine cancer teams was associated with improved processes and outcomes of care for colorectal cancer patients. The design included longitudinal survey of 13 colorectal cancer teams in Yorkshire and retrospective study of population-based data collected by the Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service. The population was all colorectal cancer patients diagnosed and treated in Yorkshire between 1995 and 2000. The main outcome measures were: variations in the use of anterior resection and preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer, chemotherapy in Dukes stage C and D patients, and five-year survival. Using multilevel models, these outcomes were assessed in relation to measures of the extent of Calman-Hine implementation throughout the study period, namely: (i) each team's degree of adherence to the Manual of Cancer Service Standards (which outlines the specification of the 'ideal' colorectal cancer team) and (ii) the extent of site specialisation of each team's surgeons. Variation was observed in the extent to which the colorectal cancer teams in Yorkshire had conformed to the Calman-Hine recommendations. An increase in surgical site specialisation was associated with increased use of preoperative radiotherapy (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.04-1.98, P<0.04) and anterior resection (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.16-1.76, P<0.01) in rectal cancer patients. Increases in adherence to the Manual of Cancer Service Standards was associated with improved five-year survival after adjustment for the casemix factors of age, stage of disease, socioeconomic status and year of diagnosis, especially for colon cancer (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.94-0.99 P<0.01). There was a similar trend of improved survival in relation to increased surgical site specialisation for rectal cancer, although the effect was not statistically significant (HR=0.93, 95% CI=0.84-1.03, P=0.15). In conclusion, the extent of implementation of the Calman-Hine report has been variable and its recommendations are associated with improvements in processes and outcomes of care for colorectal cancer patients.

Establishing cancer units.

The creation of effective cancer units is central to the implementation of the report A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services, produced by the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales, recently issued by the Department of Health in April 1995. While cancer units are described in this report a range of important questions remain about their nature and how they should be developed. This paper addresses these issues in three ways. A definition of the cancer unit is suggested and its main implications spelt out. The problems of establishing cancer units are covered under three headings. Where should cancer units be? Which cancer sites should the unit cover? What is needed to establish the cancer unit? Finally two checklists are presented, describing the task from the perspectives of the district health authority and hospital(s) concerned. The underlying theme is that real changes in clinical practice and organisation are the goal, and these can only be achieved where there is extensive local dialogue in which the relevant issues are addressed in a structured and rigorous manner. Cosmetic changes in hospital designation will not achieve the consistent quality of cancer service that is the cornerstone of the 'Calman' policy.

Progress in establishing non-surgical oncology within English cancer units.

In 1995 the Department of Health recommended a minimum standard of five non-surgical oncology sessions per week at Cancer Units. Postal surveys of cancer units in England were conducted in 1996 and 1999 to establish the level of provision. Substantial progress has been made from 20-60% of responding units meeting the minimum standard.

Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer.

The formation of multidisciplinary breast teams across the UK is intended to concentrate the assessment and treatment of breast cancer into the hands of high volume specialists. We undertook a retrospective population-based study in order to determine the trends in surgeon breast cancer workload in Yorkshire, UK, and to investigate whether patients treated by low-workload surgeons had poorer survival. Of 11 329 female breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1989-1994 in Yorkshire, 6% were managed by surgeons with a mean annual workload of less than 10 new patients, while surgeons with workloads of 10-29, 30-49 and >50 treated 21, 21 and 52%, respectively. Over the study period, increasing number of patients were managed by surgeons with higher workloads. Patients treated by low-workload surgeons had poorer survival. Five-year survival was 60% in the lowest workload category compared to 68% in the highest category. The relative risk of death was increased by 15% (RR=1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28) and by 10% (RR=1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18) for patients managed by surgeons with workloads <10 and 10-29 cases per annum in comparison to patients managed by surgeons with workloads of >50. The results of this study suggest increasing site specialisation in breast cancer among general surgeons. It also provides further evidence that the management of patients by surgeons with low workloads decreases overall survival.

Lung cancer referral patterns in the former Yorkshire region of the UK.

The purpose of this study was to find out what proportion of patients are referred as lung cancer guidelines assume, whether different referral pathways result in different management and what proportion of patients are seen within recommended time intervals between referral and treatment. A randomly selected sample of 400 lung cancer cases registered with the former Yorkshire Cancer Registry database in 1993 was selected for casenote analysis. Mode of presentation, speciality of initial referral, treatment by specialist, time intervals for key points in the referral pathways were analyzed. A total of 362 (90.5%) of case-notes were available. Less than half of lung cancer patients (173, 47.8%) presented to hospital with a chest X-ray diagnosis of lung cancer. Forty-one (11.3%) presented as self-referrals to Accident and Emergency and the remainder were referred without a diagnosis of lung cancer by other routes, mainly via GPs. Patients who did not present initially with a lung cancer diagnosis were less likely to receive specialist care (62%:96%), or have their diagnosis histologically confirmed (57.1%:80.3%) or receive surgery or radical radiotherapy (6.9%:13.9%). Nine per cent of all 362 patients did not receive a specialist opinion. Eighty per cent of patients referred by a GP with CXR suspected lung cancer were seen at hospital within 2 weeks. Only 32.4% of those receiving active treatment were treated within 8 weeks of clinical diagnosis or first hospital visit. Lung cancer patients presenting to hospital without a suspicious CXR are less likely to have specialist care, histological confirmation of their cancer and have lower rates of active treatment (surgery, any radiotherapy or chemotherapy).