Perioperative clinical practice recommendations for pediatric tonsillectomy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children. Since most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to support surgical decisions, none are specifically designed for the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy. We aimed to identify and analyze the existing CPGs with recommendations for the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy by conducting a systematic review. SOURCE: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePub Ahead of Print, and CINAHL for relevant articles published from inception to 3 August 2022. The inclusion criteria were: 1) CPG of perioperative recommendations for tonsillectomy under general anesthesia in children, 2) CPG that include at least one evidence-based recommendation, 3) peer-reviewed CPG published in English after 2000. We extracted data on baseline characteristics of each CPG and general recommendations for perioperative interventions or complications. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of five eligible CPGs, AGREE II and REX confirmed that two CPGs were high quality while only one of the two was recommended for implementation without modifications. Most of the recommendations were for pain management. Acetaminophen was the only medication recommended in all five CPG. Except for the oldest CPG, the CPG all supported of the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids as a pain adjunct. CONCLUSIONS: Acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroids are recommended in the perioperative management of pediatric tonsillectomy. Future CPG should further clarify the safe use of opioids based on severity of obstructive sleep apnea and in the context of opioid-sparing techniques, such as dexmedetomidine, high-dose dexamethasone, and gabapentinoids. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021253374); first submitted 18 June 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'amygdalectomie est l'une des interventions chirurgicales les plus courantes pratiquées chez les enfants. Étant donné que la plupart des lignes directrices de pratique clinique sont conçues pour soutenir les décisions chirurgicales, aucune n'est spécifiquement conçue pour la prise en charge périopératoire des enfants bénéficiant d'une amygdalectomie. Notre objectif était d'identifier et d'analyser les lignes directrices de pratique clinique existantes comportant des recommandations pour la prise en charge périopératoire des enfants bénéficiant d'une amygdalectomie en réalisant une revue systématique. SOURCES: Nous avons recherché des articles pertinents dans Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePub Ahead of Print et CINAHL, publiés depuis la création de ces bases de données jusqu'au 3 août 2022. Les critères d'inclusion étaient les suivants : 1) lignes directrices de pratique clinique comportant des recommandations périopératoires pour l'amygdalectomie sous anesthésie générale chez les enfants, 2) lignes directrices de pratique clinique incluant au moins une recommandation fondée sur des données probantes, et 3) lignes directrices de pratique clinique évaluées par des pairs et publiées en anglais après 2000. Nous avons extrait des données sur les caractéristiques de base de chacune des lignes directrices de pratique clinique et des recommandations générales pour les interventions périopératoires ou les complications. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Sur les cinq lignes directrices de pratique clinique admissibles, AGREE II et REX ont confirmé que deux lignes directrices de pratique clinique étaient de haute qualité, tandis qu'une seule des deux a été recommandée pour une mise en œuvre sans modifications. La plupart des recommandations portaient sur la prise en charge de la douleur. L'acétaminophène était le seul médicament recommandé dans les cinq lignes directrices de pratique clinique. À l'exception des lignes directrices de pratique clinique les plus anciennes, les autres ont toutes soutenu l'utilisation d'agents anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens et de stéroïdes comme adjuvants pour la douleur. CONCLUSION: L'acétaminophène, les agents anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens et les stéroïdes sont recommandés pour la prise en charge périopératoire de l'amygdalectomie pédiatrique. À l'avenir, les lignes directrices de pratique clinique devraient clarifier davantage l'utilisation sécuritaire des opioïdes en fonction de la gravité de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil et dans le contexte des techniques d'épargne des opioïdes, telles que la dexmédétomidine, la dexaméthasone à forte dose et les gabapentinoïdes. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42021253374); soumise pour la première fois le 18 juin 2021.

Elder abuse geriatrics: describing an important new medical specialist.

Elder mistreatment, including elder abuse and neglect, is a difficult diagnosis to make and manage for most providers. To address this, two elder abuse consultation teams were developed for patients in the hospital and emergency department settings. As these teams have developed, the providers involved have obtained specialized training and experience that we believe contributes to a new field of elder abuse geriatrics, a corollary to the well-established field of child abuse pediatrics. Providers working in this field require specialized training and have a specialized scope of practice that includes forensic evaluation, evaluation of cognition and capacity, care coordination and advocacy for victims of abuse, and collaboration with protective services and law enforcement. Here we describe the training, scope of practice, ethical role, and best practices for elder mistreatment medical consultation. We hope this will serve as a starting point for this new and important medical specialty.

The Fragility Index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.

PURPOSE: The P value is a widely used measure of statistical importance but has many drawbacks and limitations, one being that it does not reflect the robustness of the results of a clinical trial. The Fragility Index (FI) was developed as a measure of how many outcome events would need to change to nonevents to render a significant P value nonsignificant (P ≥ 0.05). The FI of trials from other medical specialties is typically < 5. We aimed to determine the FI of pediatric anesthesiology randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to test for association with various characteristics of the included trials. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of high-impact anesthesia, surgical, and medical journals from the last 25 years for trials comparing an intervention between two groups with a statistically significant P value (< 0.05) for a dichotomous outcome. We also compared FI values for variables that reflect the quality and importance of a trial. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range] FI was 3 [1-7] and correlated positively with the number of participants (rS = 0.41; P < 0.001) and events (rS = 0.42; P < 0.001), and negatively with the P value (rPB = -0.36; P < 0.001). Other measures of trial quality and impact or importance were not strongly associated with the FI. CONCLUSIONS: The FI of published trials in pediatric anesthesiology is similarly low as in other medical specialties. Larger trials with more events and P values ≤ 0.01 were associated with a higher FI.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La valeur P est une mesure d'importance statistique largement utilisée, mais elle présente de nombreux inconvénients et limites, notamment parce qu'elle ne reflète pas la robustesse des résultats d'une étude clinique. L'indice de fragilité (IF) a été mis au point pour mesurer le nombre d'événements du critère d'évaluation qui devraient se transformer en non-événements pour obtenir une valeur P non significative (P ≥ 0,05). L'IF des études d'autres spécialités médicales est généralement < 5. Notre objectif était de déterminer l'IF des études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) en anesthésiologie pédiatrique et de tester l'association avec diverses caractéristiques des études incluses. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une recherche systématique exhaustive dans les revues d'anesthésie, de chirurgie et médicales à fort impact des 25 dernières années pour trouver des études comparant une intervention entre deux groupes avec une valeur P significative d'un point de vue statistique (< 0,05) pour un résultat dichotomique. Nous avons également comparé les valeurs d'IF pour les variables qui reflètent la qualité et l'importance d'une étude. RéSULTATS: L'IF médian [écart interquartile] était de 3 [1 à 7] et était positivement corrélé avec le nombre de participant·es (rS = 0,41; P < 0,001) et d'événements (rS = 0,42; P < 0,001), et négativement avec la valeur P (rPB = -0,36; P < 0,001). D'autres mesures de la qualité et de l'impact ou de l'importance des études n'étaient pas fortement associées à l'IF. CONCLUSION: L'IF des études publiées en anesthésiologie pédiatrique est tout aussi faible que dans d'autres spécialités médicales. Des études plus importantes avec plus d'événements et des valeurs P ≤ 0,01 étaient associées à un IF plus élevé.

Prophylaxis for pediatric postoperative nausea and vomiting: a scoping review of clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia, and clinicians seek prophylactic interventions to prevent its ill effects on patients as well as its ramifications on perioperative care. We sought to assess the body of evidence around prophylactic strategies, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, targeting pediatric PONV. SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePubs Ahead of Print and In-Process Citations, Embase Classic+Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL (via the Ovid platform), Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry, from their inception to 23 September 2022. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 188 clinical trials, 157 (83%) investigated pharmacologic interventions, 25 (13%) investigated nonpharmacologic interventions, and six (3%) investigated mixed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. The most common surgeries investigated for pediatric PONV were strabismus surgery (68 trials, 36%) and tonsillectomy or tympanoplasty (45 trials, 23%). Of four measurement tools used to assess PONV in the included trials, the most common was clinical judgement (170 trials, 90%). CONCLUSION: The majority of data in pediatric PONV prophylaxis is based on pharmacologic interventions, with a paucity of research in nonpharmacologic or mixed interventions. Assessing and documenting PONV using tools such as the Baxter Animated Retching Faces Scale or PONV numeric scoring system may help standardize pediatric PONV prophylaxis research moving forward. Furthermore, concurrently assessing pain and adverse effects associated with PONV might further inform our understanding of this complex clinical entity.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les nausées et vomissements postopératoires (NVPO) sont fréquents chez la patientèle pédiatrique bénéficiant d'une anesthésie générale, et les équipes cliniques recherchent des interventions prophylactiques pour prévenir leurs effets néfastes sur les patient·es ainsi que leurs ramifications sur les soins périopératoires. Nous avons cherché à évaluer l'ensemble des données probantes entourant les stratégies prophylactiques pharmacologiques et non pharmacologiques ciblant les NVPO pédiatriques. SOURCES: Nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePubs Ahead of Print and In-Process Citations, Embase Classic+Embase, la base de données des revues systématiques Cochrane, Cochrane CENTRAL (via la plateforme Ovid), Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), ClinicalTrials.gov, le système d'enregistrement international des essais cliniques de l'OMS et le registre international normalisé des numéros d'essais contrôlés randomisés, depuis leur création jusqu'au 23 septembre 2022. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Sur 188 études cliniques, 157 (83 %) portaient sur des interventions pharmacologiques, 25 (13 %) sur des interventions non pharmacologiques et six (3 %) sur des interventions pharmacologiques et non pharmacologiques mixtes. Les chirurgies les plus fréquemment étudiées pour les NVPO pédiatriques étaient les chirurgies de strabisme (68 études, 36 %) et les amygdalectomies ou tympanoplasties (45 études, 23 %). Parmi les quatre outils de mesure utilisés pour évaluer les NVPO dans les études incluses, le plus fréquemment utilisé était le jugement clinique (170 études, 90 %). CONCLUSION: La majorité des données sur les prophylaxies pédiatriques pour prévenir les NVPO sont basées sur des interventions pharmacologiques, avec peu de recherche sur les interventions non pharmacologiques ou mixtes. L'évaluation et la documentation des NVPO à l'aide d'outils tels que l'échelle Baxter Animated Retching Faces Scale ou un système de notation numérique des NVPO peuvent aider à normaliser la recherche sur la prophylaxie pédiatrique des NVPO à l'avenir. De plus, l'évaluation simultanée de la douleur et des effets indésirables associés aux NVPO pourrait éclairer davantage notre compréhension de cette entité clinique complexe.

Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drugs such as propofol and ketamine are used alone or in combination to provide sedation for medical procedures in children. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the safety and effectiveness of propofol and ketamine to other drug regimens. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Web of Science, and the grey literature (meta-Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar) for randomized controlled studies comparing intravenous propofol and ketamine to any other single or combination drug regimen administered to children undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Meta-analyses were performed for primary (hemodynamic and respiratory adverse events) and secondary outcomes using RevMan 5.3. We assessed the risk of bias and the certainty (quality) evidence for all outcomes using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included for analysis. Based on low-to-moderate quality evidence, we concluded that the use of propofol and ketamine may result in a slight-to-small reduction in the risk of hypotension, bradycardia, and apnea, and a slight increase in the risk of tachycardia, hypertension, and other respiratory adverse events, such as cough or laryngospasm. The ratio of propofol to ketamine and comparator drug regimen subgroups effects were important for desaturation and some secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of propofol and ketamine had a minimal effect on the incidence of adverse events and other secondary outcomes. Large-scale studies are required to more accurately estimate adverse event rates and the effects of propofol and ketamine on patient-important outcomes.

A practical guide to acute pain management in children.

In the pediatric population, pain is frequently under-recognized and inadequately treated. Improved education and training of health care providers can positively impact the management of pain in children. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical clinical approach to the management of acute pain in the pediatric inpatient population. This will include an overview of commonly used pain management modalities and their potential pitfalls. For institutions that have a pediatric acute pain service or are considering initiating one, it is our hope to provide a useful tool to aid clinicians in the safe and effective treatment of pain in children.

Patient-Controlled Analgesia Plus Background Opioid Infusion for Postoperative Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Bolus administration of opioids via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device is widely used in the postoperative pediatric population. PCA devices have been shown to provide superior analgesia and greater patient satisfaction compared with intermittent administration. Studies comparing the efficacy of PCA with and without a background infusion for postoperative analgesia in children vary considerably in terms of dosing and methodologic quality, making it difficult for practitioners to derive clinically useful information. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess whether the addition of a background infusion to PCA bolus administration of an opioid analgesic is more effective (defined as lower pain scores) than PCA bolus alone in the postoperative population specific to children. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to January 2015 for registered and ongoing trials included in the meta-Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of review articles and included articles. Study selection was randomized controlled studies comparing PCA bolus with PCA bolus plus background infusion for postoperative analgesia in children aged 0 to 18 years and adolescents aged 13 to 21 years undergoing any form of surgery that used patient-reported pain scores as an outcome measure. Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient and study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes from included studies using standardized data extraction forms. Seven trials met our eligibility criteria. Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes that were defined similarly and reported in 2 or more studies, including patient-reported pain scores, nausea and/or vomiting, sedation, and opioid consumption. We independently assessed the risk of bias for each outcome and the certainty in the estimates of effect for critically important outcomes (pain scores, nausea and/or vomiting, excessive sedation) using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Subgroup analyses based on dose of background infusion (high versus low dose) and risk of bias (low versus high/unclear) were performed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences found with respect to pain scores 12 and 24 hours after surgery, opioid consumption, or risk of adverse events with the addition of a background opioid infusion to PCA opioid bolus doses. The quality of the evidence was deemed to be low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in outcomes with the addition of an opioid background infusion to PCA bolus doses of opioid. Further high-quality studies are required.

Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane vs surgeon administered intraoperative regional field infiltration with bupivacaine for early postoperative pain control in children undergoing open pyeloplasty.

PURPOSE: Regional analgesic techniques are commonly used in pediatric urology. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block has recently gained popularity. However, there is a paucity of information supporting a benefit over regional field infiltration. We present a parallel group, randomized, controlled trial evaluating ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block superiority over surgeon delivered regional field infiltration for children undergoing open pyeloplasty at a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following ethics board approval and registration, children 0 to 6 years old were recruited and randomized to undergo perioperative transversus abdominis plane block or regional field infiltration for early post-pyeloplasty pain control. General anesthetic delivery, surgical technique and postoperative analgesics were standardized. A blinded assessor regularly captured pain scores in the recovery room using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale. The primary outcome was the need for rescue morphine administration based on a FLACC score of 3 or higher. RESULTS: Two pediatric urologists performed 57 pyeloplasties during a 2.5-year period, enrolling 32 children (16 in each group, balanced for age and weight). There were statistically significant differences in the number of children requiring rescue morphine administration (13 of 16 receiving transversus abdominis plane block and 6 of 16 receiving regional field infiltration, p = 0.011), mean ± SD total morphine consumption (0.066 ± 0.051 vs 0.028 ± 0.040 mg/kg, p = 0.021) and mean ± SD pain scores (5 ± 5 vs 2 ± 3, p = 0.043) in the recovery room, in favor of surgeon administered regional field infiltration. No local anesthetic specific adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block is not superior to regional field infiltration with bupivacaine as a strategy to minimize early opioid requirements following open pyeloplasty in children. Instead, our data suggest that surgeon delivered regional field infiltration provides better pain control.

The safety of modern anesthesia for children with long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) may experience a clinical spectrum of symptoms, ranging from asymptomatic, through presyncope, syncope, and aborted cardiac arrest, to sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmias in LQTS are often precipitated by autonomic changes. This patient population is believed to be at high risk for perioperative arrhythmia, specifically torsades de pointes (TdP), although this perception is largely based on limited literature that predates current anesthetic drugs and standards of perioperative monitoring. We present the largest multicenter review to date of anesthetic management in children with LQTS. METHODS: We conducted a multicentered retrospective chart review of perioperative management of children with clinically diagnosed LQTS, aged 18 years or younger, who received general anesthesia (GA) between January 2005 and January 2010. Data from 8 institutions were collated in an anonymized database. RESULTS: One hundred three patients with LQTS underwent a total of 158 episodes of GA. The median (interquartile range) age and weight of the patients at the time of GA was 9 (3-15) years and 30.3 (15.4-54) kg, respectively. Surgery was LQTS-related in 81 (51%) GA episodes (including pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and loop recorder insertions and revisions and lead extractions) and incidental in 77 (49%). ß-blocker therapy was administered to 76% of patients on the day of surgery and 47% received sedative premedication. Nineteen percent of patients received total IV anesthesia, 30% received total inhaled anesthesia, and the remaining 51% received a combination. No patient received droperidol. There were 5 perioperative episodes of TdP, all in neonates or infants, all in surgery that was LQTS-related, and none of which was overtly attributable to anesthetic regimen. Thus the incidence (95% confidence interval) of perioperative TdP in incidental versus LQTS-related surgery was 0/77 (0%; 0%-5%) vs 5/81 (6.2%; 2%-14%). CONCLUSIONS: With optimized perioperative management, modern anesthesia for incidental surgery in patients with LQTS is safer than anecdotal case report literature might suggest. Our series suggests that the risk of perioperative TdP is concentrated in neonates and infants requiring urgent interventions after failed first-line management of LQTS.

Accuracy of manual palpation vs ultrasound for identifying the L3-L4 intervertebral space level in children.

BACKGROUND: Insertion of needles into the spinal or epidural space is an important component of modern anesthetic practice. Needles are usually inserted at or below the L3-L4 intervertebral space to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury. Manual palpation is the most common method for identifying intervertebral spaces. However, anesthesiologists are increasingly using ultrasonography to guide the placement of regional, including neuraxial, anesthetic, and analgesic blocks. We undertook an observational study to compare the accuracy of manual palpation and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space level. METHODS: Thirty children 0-12 years of age undergoing lumbar puncture were enrolled. For each subject, an anesthesiologist, using the landmark palpation method, determined the point on a radio-opaque ruler that corresponded to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. A different anesthesiologist using the ultrasound method repeated this measurement. Fluoroscopy was then used to confirm the accuracy of each technique. The proportion of inaccurate measurements and the effects of anesthesiologists' experience, patient age, and size on the accuracy of each technique were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of measurements by the landmark palpation method were inaccurate by ≥1 levels cephalad to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. However, less experienced anesthesiologists (residents and fellows) made a disproportionate number of inaccurate measurements compared to consultants. Twenty-three percent of measurements by the ultrasound method were inaccurate by ≥1 cephalad levels. The BMI-for-age percentile/weight-for-length percentile was higher in patients in whom either technique was inaccurate. CONCLUSION: This observational study found no difference in the accuracy of landmark palpation, when performed by a consultant anesthesiologist, and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space in children.

Unusual presentation of postdural puncture headache requiring repeat epidural blood patch in a 4-year-old child.

We present the case of a 4-year-old child who required two epidural blood patches (EBPs) to treat a delayed onset postdural puncture headache (PDPH) caused by lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drain. The first EBP was unsuccessful with 0.41 ml·kg(-1) of blood injected. A second EBP with 0.76 ml·kg(-1) of blood was performed 2 days later with the complete resolution of symptoms. The volume of blood necessary for effective treatment for symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks in children remains controversial, and a repeat EBP may be required for resolution of symptoms.

Appraising and highlighting gaps among prophylactic intervention studies for reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a leading perioperative morbidity outcome following general anaesthesia. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence synthesis studies of prophylactic interventions that reduce the incidence of paediatric PONV, thereby highlighting knowledge gaps and avenues of future research. DESIGN: Systematic review using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) tool and the ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool. DATA SOURCES: Seven major databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to 23 September 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Evidence synthesis studies of only randomised controlled trials that explored prophylactic interventions for PONV in children undergoing general anaesthesia. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Following screening process by two reviewers, data were extracted from all eligible studies, including demographic parameters and details of interventions. Eligible studies were categorised into 'pharmacological' and 'non-pharmacological' groups and high-risk surgical groups of 'strabismus' and 'tonsillectomy' for qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: There were 20 evidence synthesis reviews (17 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, 1 network meta-analysis): 14 investigated pharmacological PONV prophylaxis in children, 5 investigated non-pharmacological interventions, 1 studied both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis agents, for example, dexamethasone (relative risk (RR) 0.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.58), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20) and α2-adrenoreceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.54), are more effective than placebo. A combination of pharmacological agents provided superior efficacy to monotherapy, particularly dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonists (RR 0.21, 95% credible interval 0.15 to 0.28). Acustimulation practice was consistently favourable in preventing PONV compared with placebo (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.52). CONCLUSION: Monotherapy pharmacological prophylaxis is more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of paediatric PONV, with the efficacy increased further by using combination pharmacotherapy. Further research must compare multiple treatment arms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylaxes for PONV to identify the optimal multimodal prophylaxis regimen. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236698.

A survey of ultrasound use by academic and community anesthesiologists in Ontario.

PURPOSE: The use of ultrasound for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and regional anesthesia (RA) has been recommended to improve efficacy and patient safety. We conducted a survey to evaluate the degree to which ultrasound use has been adopted into routine practice by anesthesiologists in the province of Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Following approval by the Research Ethics Board at The Hospital for Sick Children, we conducted a web-based survey of anesthesiologists registered with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. The anesthesiologists surveyed were working in academic or community hospitals. The survey elicited information on the degree of routine use of ultrasound for CVC or RA blocks, reasons for non-use of ultrasound, and methods of ultrasound training. RESULTS: A questionnaire was sent to 450 anesthesiologists via e-mail. There were 209 (46%) respondents, six of whom were excluded as the anesthesiologists were no longer in practice, resulting in 203 responses for analysis. Of these, 163 anesthesiologists practiced in academic hospitals, and 40 practiced in community hospitals. A larger proportion of academic (60%) vs community (33%) anesthesiologists use ultrasound routinely for CVC insertion (P = 0.004). Routine use for RA blocks was comparable in both groups. The most common reason given for non-use of ultrasound for CVC insertion was "ultrasound is unnecessary for safe/effective insertion of CVCs". Peer-to-peer training was the most preferred method for improving ultrasound skills. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound is better established in academic than in community anesthesia practice. Anesthesiologists in community practice appear to be adopting ultrasound at a slower pace, which may be explained by lack of equipment and lack of training.

Substrate reduction therapy in juvenile GM2 gangliosidosis.

Substrate reduction therapy (SRT) is considered to be a potential therapeutic option for juvenile GM2 gangliosidosis (jGM2g). We evaluated the efficacy of SRT in jGM2g, assessing neurological, neuropsychological and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes over a 24-month period of treatment. In an open-label and single-center study, five jGM2g patients (mean age 14.6+/-4.5 years) received oral miglustat at doses of 100-200mg t.i.d. adjusted to body surface area. Patients underwent general and neurological examinations, neuropsychological, electrophysiological, and brain MRI studies. All patients showed neurological deterioration over the period of the study, with particularly notable worsening of gait, speech and coordination. One patient experienced acute psychosis, and another showed worsening of pre-existing epilepsy. Some neuropsychological tests showed no evidence of deterioration in the three patients with high enough cognitive functioning for reliable assessment. Profound cognitive impairment in two children precluded neuropsychological evaluation. In four patients, evaluation of brain MRI showed no changes in white matter signal abnormalities and cerebellar atrophy noted at baseline, while one patient showed progression of cerebellar and supratentorial brain atrophy. Transmission electron microscopy analysis of peripheral mononuclear cells showed reduction of intracytoplasmatic inclusions with treatment. SRT with miglustat of patients with jGM2g failed to ameliorate progressive neurological deterioration, but apparently no worsening of some areas of cognitive function tested and brain MRI lesions was noted over 24 months of treatment. The results must be interpreted with care owing to the small sample of patients and the lack of a control-arm.

The use of NSAIDs in pediatric scoliosis surgery - a survey of physicians' prescribing practice.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric scoliosis surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain requiring opioids for analgesia. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be used as adjuvants for analgesia; however, the potential of these agents to affect bone healing raises concerns. No large-scale prospective studies have been performed to evaluate the benefit-to-risk ratio of NSAID use after pediatric scoliosis surgery. Given the lack of evidence in the literature, a survey of practice patterns of anesthesiologists from around the world was conducted with respect to the use of NSAIDs after pediatric spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen anesthesiologists from international academic pediatric hospitals were asked to complete an online survey. After 1 month, nonresponders were sent a second e-mail asking for their participation. All questions were developed specifically for this study. RESULTS: Out of 80 anesthesiologists who responded 61 were included in the final analysis. Fifty-nine percent routinely use NSAIDs, the most common agents being intravenous ketorolac and oral ibuprofen. The majority of respondents begin to administer NSAIDs within the first three postoperative days for a duration of four or more days. The primary reason for not routinely prescribing NSAIDs was the risk of bone nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates that the practice patterns of pediatric anesthesiologists from around the world with respect to the administration of NSAIDs for the management of postoperative pain after pediatric spinal fusion reflects the conflicting evidence in the literature and the lack of high-quality studies in humans.

N-acetylcysteine use among patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgeries are complex procedures aiming to re-establish coronary flow and correct valvular defects. Oxidative stress, caused by inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injury, is associated with these procedures, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) acts as an antioxidant by replenishing the glutathione stores, and emerging evidence suggests that NAC may reduce the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the addition of NAC to a standard of care among adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS) from inception to October 2018 and the grey literaure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of NAC on pre-defined outcomes including mortality, acute renal insufficiency (ARI), acute cardiac insufficiency (ACI), hospital length of stay (HLoS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICULoS), arrhythmia and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias among eligible articles. We used the GRADE approach to rate the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs including 2,486 participants proved eligible. Low to moderate certainty evidence demonstrated that the addition of NAC resulted in a non-statistically significant reduction in mortality (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.71; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.25), ARI (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.09), ACI (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.38), HLoS (Mean Difference (MD) 0.21; 95% CI -0.64 to 0.23), ICULoS (MD -0.04; 95% CI -0.29 to 0.20), arrhythmia (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.20), and AMI (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.48). LIMITATIONS: Among eligible trials, we observed heterogeneity in the population and interventions including patients with and without kidney dysfunction and interventions that differed in route of administration, dosage, and duration of treatment. This observed heterogeneity was not explained by our subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of NAC during cardiac surgery did not result in a statistically significant reduction in clinical outcomes. A large randomized placebo-controlled multi-centre trial is needed to determine whether NAC reduces mortality. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018091191.

Coadministration of propofol and remifentanil for lumbar puncture in children: dose-response and an evaluation of two dose combinations.

BACKGROUND: The combination of propofol and remifentanil may be particularly suitable for short-duration procedures such as lumbar puncture. The authors undertook a two-part study to evaluate coadministration of propofol and remifentanil as an anesthetic technique for lumbar puncture in children. METHODS: The first part was a sequential allocation dose-finding study to determine the minimum effective dose of remifentanil when coadministered with 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg propofol. The second was a randomized double-blind study to compare the intraoperative and recovery characteristics of 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg propofol coadministered with the corresponding effective dose of remifentanil. RESULTS: Effective doses of remifentanil in 98% of children were 1.50 +/- 1.00 and 0.52 +/- 1.06 microg/kg when coadministered with 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg propofol, respectively. The duration of apnea was longer (median, 110 vs. 73 s; P < 0.05) and the time to awakening was shorter (median, 10 vs. 23 min; P < 0.05) after 2.0 mg/kg propofol plus 1.5 microg/kg remifentanil compared with 4.0 mg/kg propofol plus 0.5 microg/kg remifentanil. No child experienced hypotension or postprocedure nausea or vomiting after either dose combination. CONCLUSIONS: Both dose combinations (2.0 mg/kg propofol plus 1.5 microg/kg remifentanil and 4.0 mg/kg propofol plus 0.5 microg/kg remifentanil) provide effective anesthesia for lumbar puncture in children. However, the intraoperative and recovery characteristics of the two dose combinations differ in that the duration of apnea increases whereas recovery time decreases as the dose of remifentanil is increased and that of propofol is decreased.