Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: systematic review and clinical considerations.

We conducted a systematic review to determine the appropriate use of bortezomib alone or in combination with other agents in patients with multiple myeloma (mm). We searched medline, embase, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of included studies. We analyzed randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews if they involved adult mm patients treated with bortezomib and if they reported on survival, disease control, response, quality of life, or adverse effects. Twenty-six unique studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients with previously untreated mm and for candidates for transplantation, we found a statistically significant benefit in time to progression [hazard ratio (hr): 0.48, p < 0.001; and hr: 0.63, p = 0.006, respectively] and a better response with a bortezomib than with a non-bortezomib regimen (p < 0.001). Progression-free survival was longer with bortezomib and thalidomide than with thalidomide alone (p = 0.01). In non-candidates for transplantation, a significant benefit in overall survival was observed with a bortezomib regimen (hr compared with a non-bortezomib regimen: 0.61; p = 0.008), and in transplantation candidates receiving bortezomib, the response rate was improved after induction (p = 0.004) and after a first transplant (p = 0.016). In relapsed or refractory mm, overall survival (p = 0.03), time to progression (hr: 1.82; p = 0.000004), and progression-free survival (hr: 1.69; p = 0.000026) were significantly improved with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (compared with bortezomib alone), and bortezomib monotherapy was better than dexamethasone alone (hr: 0.77; p = 0.027). Bortezomib combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone was better than either bortezomib monotherapy or thalidomide with dexamethasone (p < 0.001). In previously untreated or in relapsed or refractory mm patients, bortezomib-based therapy has improved disease control and, in some patients, overall survival.

Dose-intensive chemotherapy with growth factor or autologous bone marrow or stem-cell transplant support in first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic adult soft tissue sarcoma: a clinical practice guideline.

QUESTIONS: In patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, does first-line dose-intensive chemotherapy supported by growth factor or autologous bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation improve response rate, time to disease progression, or survival as compared with standard-dose chemotherapy? What are the effects of first-line dose-intensive chemotherapy supported by growth factor or autologous bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation on toxicity and quality of life? PERSPECTIVES: Because therapeutic options for adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma are scarce and the possibility of cure for these patients is extremely limited, the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (dsg) felt that a review of the available literature on dose-intensive chemotherapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma and subsequent development of a clinical practice guideline based on the evidence were important. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was developed and clinical recommendations relevant to patients in Ontario were drafted. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Sarcoma dsg, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, a pathologist, a methodologist, and community representatives. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey, the results of which were incorporated into the practice guideline. Final review and approval of the practice guideline was obtained from the Report Approval Panel. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Based on the systematic review, consensus, and external review, the Sarcoma dsg makes these recommendations: Dose-intensive chemotherapy with growth factor support is not recommended in the first-line treatment of patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The data are insufficient to support the use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in this group of patients. Eligible patients should be encouraged to enter clinical trials assessing novel approaches or compounds. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: High-dose chemotherapy with growth factor or autologous bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation has adverse effects similar to those seen with standard-dose chemotherapy. With high-dose regimens, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia is significantly higher, and neutropenic fever and febrile neutropenia occur more frequently. Compared with standard treatment, the rate of treatment-related death is also higher with high-dose regimens.

Ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma: a practice guideline.

QUESTIONS: In adult patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma, do combination chemotherapy regimens containing ifosfamide have an advantage in terms of response rate, time to progression, or survival, as compared with similar regimens without ifosfamide when used as first-line therapy? What are the adverse effects and effects on quality of life of ifosfamide-containing combination chemotherapy as compared with similar regimens without ifosfamide? PERSPECTIVES: The prognosis for patients with inoperable or meta-static soft-tissue sarcoma (sts) remains grim. Although the surgical resection of pulmonary metastases may be curative in 15%-30% of patients with isolated slow-growing metastases, most patients receive chemotherapy for palliative purposes. Ifosfamide has documented activity in patients who have received prior treatment with, or who have progressed on, doxorubicin. A number of studies have suggested a schedule and a dose-response relationship for ifosfamide in metastatic sts. Ifosfamide has also been assessed in combination with other drugs such as doxorubicin and dacarbazine (dtic); results of such studies have led some authors to suggest that polychemotherapy using "appropriate doses" of ifosfamide and doxorubicin may represent the "most effective systemic treatment" in this population. Given the limited effective therapeutic options available for patients with metastatic sts, the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (dsg) felt that a need existed to more specifically evaluate the potential benefits of ifosfamide-containing combination chemotherapy in that setting. The Sarcoma dsg developed an evidence-based series report through systematic review, evidence synthesis, and input from practitioners across Ontario. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included survival, response rate, adverse events, and quality of life. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review and meta-analysis served as the evidentiary base for this clinical practice guideline. The report was reviewed and approved by the Sarcoma dsg, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, methodologists, and patient representatives. The results of an external review by Ontario practitioners, obtained through a mailed survey, were incorporated into this report. Final approval of the evidence-based series report was obtained from the Report Approval Panel of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). RESULTS: The current practice guideline reflects a combination of the draft recommendations (based on the evidence identified in a systematic review and meta-analysis) and the external feedback from Ontario practitioners and the pebc's Report Approval Panel. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: In patients with metastatic sts, the addition of ifosfamide to standard first-line doxorubicin-containing regimens is not recommended over single-agent doxorubicin. However, in patients with symptomatic, locally advanced, or inoperable sts, in whom tumour response might potentially result in reduced symptomatology or render a tumour resectable, use of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin is reasonable. QUALIFYING STATEMENT: In combination with a doxorubicin-containing regimen, the dose of ifosfamide should not exceed 7.5 g/m(2), given as either a split bolus or a continuous infusion.

Single-agent interleukin-2 in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

QUESTIONS: What is the role of single-agent interleukin-2 (il-2) in the treatment of adults with metastatic melanoma? If there is a role for single-agent il-2, what patient population can appropriately be considered for treatment? If there is a role for single-agent il-2, what dose and schedule are appropriate? What are the toxicities associated with il-2? PERSPECTIVES: Many agents have been investigated for antitumour activity in melanoma, but few have shown promising response rates. Early detection, appropriate surgery, and adjuvant therapy have all improved outcomes, but approximately one third of patients with early-stage disease will nevertheless develop metastases. Single-agent il-2 has attracted much attention over the past several years. A number of randomized trials and many phase ii trials investigating single-agent il-2 suggest that this systemic treatment produces durable responses in melanoma patients. Given the dismal survival of patients with meta-static melanoma and the limited availability of effective treatments, the Melanoma Disease Site Group (dsg) of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) felt that the durable responses seen with il-2 treatment warranted closer examination. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes of interest included objective response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, toxicity, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was developed, and clinical recommendations relevant to patients in Ontario were drafted. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Melanoma dsg, which comprises medical oncologists, surgeons, and dermatologists. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey, the results of which were incorporated into the practice guideline. Final review and approval of the practice guideline was obtained from the pebc's Report Approval Panel. RESULTS: The present practice guideline reflects the integration of the draft recommendations based on a systematic review of the available evidence with the feedback obtained from external review by practitioners and the Report Approval Panel. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: No studies have compared il-2 to the current standard of care-dacarbazine (dtic)-or to placebo in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. After reviewing and weighing the evidence that does exist, the opinion of the Melanoma dsg is that high-dose il-2 is a reasonable treatment option for a select group of patients with metastatic melanoma: Patients should have a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1) and a normal lactate dehydrogenase level.Patients should have fewer than three organs involved or have cutaneous and/or subcutaneous metastases only, and no evidence of central nervous system metastases should be present.In this select group of patients, il-2 treatment can produce durable complete remissions. High-dose il-2 is recommended to be given at 600,000 IU/kg per dose, delivered intravenously over 15 minutes, every 8 hours, for a maximum of 14 doses. High-dose il-2 delivery is recommended to be done in a tertiary-care facility by staff trained in the provision of this treatment and with appropriate monitoring. To facilitate treatment and to develop expertise in this therapeutic modality, the dsg recommends that high-dose il-2 programs be established in one or two centres in Ontario. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: High-dose il-2 has response rates that are similar to those seen with standard chemotherapy. However, unlike chemotherapy, il-2 demonstrates low but durable complete response rates that may lead to years of benefit for patients with metastatic melanoma. Based on the available data assessing prognostic factors and patient selection, patients with non-visceral metastases and fewer metastatic sites have a much higher response rate. In these select patients, high dose il-2 may be considered for first-line therapy. The lack of large randomized trials comparing il-2 to dtic or other chemotherapy means that recommendations for this guideline are based largely on phase ii data and limited phase iii data. Further randomized data will not soon become available, because no randomized trials are currently ongoing or planned. Interleukin-2 is currently widely used in the United States, and it is an approved therapy in both Canada and the United States.

Liver transplant recipient sera derived soluble HLA mediates allele specific CTL apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: Significant levels of donor soluble human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (sHLA) are present in patients after transplants. We investigated the possibility that sHLA may inhibit cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity by inducing apoptosis of the CTL, thereby serving as a mechanism for specific tolerance. METHODS: sHLA-A2 and A3 were isolated from the sera of liver transplant recipients by affinity chromatography. T cell bulk lines directed against HLA-A2 and HLA-A3 were generated by stimulation with HLA-A2, A3+ peripheral blood leukocytes and B-lymphoblastoid cells. Induction of T cell apoptosis by sHLA was analyzed by adding sHLA to allospecific CTL 4 or for 24 hr before flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated annexin V stained cells. T cell receptor (TCR) engagement by sHLA was demonstrated using a monoclonal antibody specific for the TCR. RESULTS: sHLA-A3 inhibited CTL activity of a HLA-A3 T cell line by 53%, whereas sHLA-A2 had no effect. sHLA-A3 also increased T cell death by 77% over the control, whereas sHLA-A2 had no significant effect. However, sHLA-A2 induced 21% apoptosis of an anti-HLA-A2 T cell line, whereas sHLA-A3 caused only 3% apoptosis. The antibody complexed form of sHLA was ineffective in the induction of apoptosis. Preincubation of the T cells with anti-T cell receptor monoclonal antibody protected the T cells from sHLA-induced apoptosis, indicating that sHLA-TCR engagement is necessary for this process to occur. CONCLUSION: TCR-mediated apoptosis of alloreactive CTL may serve as a mechanism by which sHLA can modulate the immune response.

Regulatory function of human CD4+ cytolytic T lymphocytes.

Allograft rejection is mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The lytic function of the classic CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) occurs through recognition of allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I on the surface of the graft. CD4+ CTL recognize MHC class II through a direct recognition pathway or an indirect pathway where MHC peptides are presented in the context of self MHC class II. Lytic CD4+ cells may destroy graft tissue or, we hypothesize, the indirect CD4+ T cell may down regulate CD8+ CTL by recognition of donor MHC peptides presented by self MHC class II expressed on CD8+ T cells. To define the role of CD4+ CTL in allograft outcome we used a CD4+ CTL that is MHC class II restricted, recognizing human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A1 and HLA-B8 peptides in the context of HLA-DR4. This line (MDSxA1/B8) will lyse DR4+ B lymphoblastoid cells (LCL) pulsed with HLA-A1/B8 peptides (amino acids 60-84 of the alpha1 domain of the MHC class I molecule). These T cells will also lyse peptide-pulsed antigen-specific T cell clones, both CD4+ and CD8+, that express HLA-DR4. These clones must process and present the MHC class I peptides for recognition and lysis to occur. These results suggest a possible mechanism to explain allograft tolerance. Lytic CD4+ T cells, that recognize donor HLA peptides through an indirect antigen presentation pathway, down-regulate donor-specific CTL through peptide-specific lysis resulting in graft tolerance.

Stereotaxic localization and core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: two-year follow-up of a prospective study.

In August 1989, we began a prospective study of patients with abnormal mammograms to determine the clinical efficacy of stereotaxic localization and needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. By August 1990, 115 patients had undergone stereotaxic localization and needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using the Mammotest II (Fischer Imaging, Denver, CO) and an 18-gauge needle in a Bard Biopty gun (Bard Urological, Covington, GA). In 19 per cent (22 of 115) of the cases, the pathologist suggested open surgical biopsies of the lesions due to clinical judgment, or atypical or cancer cells in the core biopsy specimen. Of these 22 cases, 12 (54%) were found to be cancer on open surgical biopsy--10 per cent of all the patients. Of the remaining 93 patients with benign pathology, 9 were lost to follow-up by the end of the second year after closure of the study. The remaining 84 patients were followed by mammography and physical exam at 3 months, at 12 months, and yearly thereafter to determine whether cancer had been missed or developed at the biopsy site. The median follow-up was 24 months (mean, 23.3 months), and all 84 patients were found to have no evidence of malignant disease at follow-up. The small group (10 cases) of patients who were determined to have benign disease by open surgical biopsy were also found on follow-up to have no evidence of malignant disease (median follow-up, 20.5 months; and mean, 18.3 months). The accuracy of this stereotaxic procedure, combined with an approximately 80 per cent decrease in the more expensive and more invasive open surgical biopsy procedure, provides strong support for the use of this procedure on all nonpalpable breast lesions that would normally proceed to open surgical biopsy.

Stereotaxic needle localization and biopsy of occult breast lesions: first year's experience.

During a 12-month period 115 patients with abnormal mammograms had stereotaxic needle localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. The procedure was performed on a Fischer Mammotest II machine (Fischer Imaging; Denver, CO) and the biopsies were taken with a #18 gauge Bard biopsy needle using a Bard biopty gun (distributed by Bard Urological; Covington, GA; manufactured by Radiplast; Uppsala, Sweden). Mammographic lesions were suspicious matrix densities (85), clustered microcalcifications (22), or a combination of both (8). The pathologist recommended open biopsy in 16 per cent (18/115) of the patients. Pathology on the 18 open biopsies revealed that 11 (9 matrix densities and 2 calcifications) were carcinomas and true positives, whereas the other 7 (all matrix densities) were benign mastopathies and false positives. Further analysis of the pathologic data showed that there were three possible diagnoses from the needle biopsies on the patients that later went to open biopsy: cancer (6), very suspicious lesion (9), and slightly suspicious lesion without atypical hyperplasia (3). All 6 cancers were confirmed by open biopsy; about half (5/9) of the very suspicious lesions were cancer and none (0/3) of the slightly suspicious lesions were cancer. More cases, followed by open biopsy, are needed to refine the selection procedure for open biopsy and careful follow-up of the patients who did not have open biopsy will also be needed to determine the false negative rate. Excellent patient acceptance was found and the test was easy to perform in the office without serious complications. Furthermore, the test was cost effective because it avoided open biopsy in 97 patients.

Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: a practice guideline.

AIMS: Bortezomib (Velcade™, PS-341), a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, has been extensively studied either alone or in combination with other agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma. We created a provincial guideline for the use of bortezomib, in newly diagnosed individuals (both eligible and ineligible for transplant) and in individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and relevant meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest were survival, disease control, response rate, response duration, quality of life and adverse effects. Members of the Cancer Care Ontario Hematology Disease Site Group (CCO HDSG), comprising physicians with content expertise, epidemiologists and consumers, developed a guideline through a systematic process that involved assessment of the best available evidence, consensus interpretation of the evidence and a validation process involving practitioners across the province. RESULTS: The CCO HDSG recommends the use of bortezomib-based combinations in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation and in individuals who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. The group further recommends the use of bortezomib, alone or in combination, for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. The evidence did not establish a subgroup of patients with myeloma that should be uniquely targeted for therapy with bortezomib. Qualifying statements by the HDSG address alternative dosing options, the management of cytopenias and the prevention of toxicities, including herpes zoster reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib alone or in combination with other agents can be recommended for both previously untreated or relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma. Guidelines for monitoring and reducing toxicity are provided.

I-Tositumomab in lymphoma.

Radioimmunoconjugates are radioisotope-bound monoclonal antibodies that target radiation specifically to sites of lymphoma involvement. Initial studies of (131)I-tositumomab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have suggested benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent disease. However, the routine adoption of this agent is tempered by concerns about associated toxicities and unclear long-term benefit. Based on a comprehensive search for studies on (131)I-tositumomab use in lymphoma, this systematic review summarizes and evaluates the evidence on the benefits and risks of this novel therapy,the predictors for response and toxicity, and the role of dosimetry and imaging studies before treatment.We identified 18 trials investigating the use of (131)I-tositumomab for the treatment of adult patients with nhl. In trials of patients with relapsed or refractory indolent nhl, overall response rates ranged from 67% to 83%. In patients with follicular nhl refractory to the monoclonal antibody rituximab, response rates remained high (65%-72%). However, in rituximab-naïve patients with relapsed or refractory indolent or transformed nhl, improvements in time to progression or survival have not been clearly established. (131)I-Tositumomab is an active agent in relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma that should be considered in selected patients.