Using mechanistic knowledge to appraise contemporary approaches to the rehabilitation of upper limb function following stroke.

It is a paradox of neurological rehabilitation that, in an era in which preclinical models have produced significant advances in our mechanistic understanding of neural plasticity, there is inadequate support for many therapies recommended for use in clinical practice. When the goal is to estimate the probability that a specific form of therapy will have a positive clinical effect, the integration of mechanistic knowledge (concerning 'the structure or way of working of the parts in a natural system') may improve the quality of inference. This is illustrated by analysis of three contemporary approaches to the rehabilitation of lateralized dysfunction affecting people living with stroke: constraint-induced movement therapy; mental practice; and mirror therapy. Damage to 'cross-road' regions of the structural (white matter) brain connectome generates deficits that span multiple domains (motor, language, attention and verbal/spatial memory). The structural integrity of these regions determines not only the initial functional status, but also the response to therapy. As structural disconnection constrains the recovery of functional capability, 'disconnectome' modelling provides a basis for personalized prognosis and precision rehabilitation. It is now feasible to refer a lesion delineated using a standard clinical scan to a (dis)connectivity atlas derived from the brains of other stroke survivors. As the individual disconnection pattern thus obtained suggests the functional domains most likely be compromised, a therapeutic regimen can be tailored accordingly. Stroke is a complex disorder that burdens individuals with distinct constellations of brain damage. Mechanistic knowledge is indispensable when seeking to ameliorate the behavioural impairments to which such damage gives rise.

Considerations for developing complex post-stroke upper limb behavioural interventions: An international qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To simultaneously explore the perspectives and opinions of different invested participant groups on the important considerations for development of upper limb behavioural interventions that drive optimal post-stroke upper limb motor recovery. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study in a constructivist epistemology. PARTICIPANTS: Purposively selected participant groups (preclinical research n = 9, clinical research n = 9, clinical experience n = 9 and lived experience n = 10). SETTING: Research participants were selected from top internationally published authors. Experiential participants were recruited internationally, through networks. RESULTS: Four themes were identified with embedded subthemes. Theme 1: 'Clinical relevance should be the core of a "good" research question' with two subthemes: 'Breaking down silos: forging interdisciplinary research teams', and 'Beyond the pipeline: bench to bedside and back'; theme 2: 'Balance restitution and compensation to maximise outcomes' with three subthemes: 'Good outcome: going beyond an outcome measure', 'Recovery is a puzzle: measure all the pieces', and 'Optimising capacity: knowing when and how'; theme 3: 'Stroke demands personalised solutions' with two subthemes: 'Condition-specific considerations', and 'Person-specific considerations'; theme 4: 'Upper limb recovery requires complex interventions' with four subthemes: 'Fuelling engagement', 'Content is crucial', 'Multidimensional dose', and 'Therapist sway'. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that post-stroke upper limb motor interventions are the interactions of multiple intervention elements (e.g. dose and content) shaped by different contextual considerations (e.g. stroke and personal factors). Development of such interventions may need to consider both content and context of the intervention to drive optimal recovery.

Prevalence of Arm Weakness, Pre-Stroke Outcomes and Other Post-Stroke Impairments Using Routinely Collected Clinical Data on an Acute Stroke Unit.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of upper limb motor weakness early post-stroke may be changing, which can have clinical and research implications. Our primary aim was to describe the prevalence of upper limb motor weakness early post-stroke, with a secondary aim to contextualize this prevalence by describing pre-stroke outcomes, other post-stroke impairments, functional activities, and discharge destination. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study extracted clinical data from confirmed stroke patients admitted to a metropolitan stroke unit over 15-months. The primary upper limb weakness measure was Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension (SAFE) score. Demographics (eg, age), clinical characteristics (eg, stroke severity), pre-stroke outcomes (eg, clinical frailty), other post-stroke impairments (eg, command following), functional activities (eg, ambulation), and discharge destination were also extracted. RESULTS: A total of 463 participants had a confirmed stroke and SAFE score. One-third of patients received ≥1 acute medical intervention(s). Nearly one-quarter of patients were classified as frail pre-stroke. Upper limb weakness (SAFE≤8) was present in 35% [95% CI: 30%-39%] at a median of 1-day post-stroke, with 22% presenting with mild-moderate weakness (SAFE5-8). The most common other impairments were upper limb coordination (46%), delayed recall (41%), and upper limb sensation (26%). After a median 3-day acute stroke stay, 52% of the sample were discharged home. CONCLUSION: Upper limb weakness was present in just over a third (35%) of the sample early post-stroke. Data on pre-stroke outcomes and the prevalence of other post-stroke impairments highlights the complexity and heterogeneity of stroke recovery. Further research is required to tease out meaningful recovery phenotypes and their implications.

Neurophysiological effects of acute aerobic exercise in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Evidence continues to accumulate that acute aerobic exercise (AAE) impacts neurophysiological excitability as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet, uncertainty exists about which TMS measures are modulated after AAE in young adults. The influence of AAE intensity and duration of effects are also uncertain. This pre-registered meta-analysis (CRD42017065673) addressed these uncertainties by synthesizing data from 23 studies (including 474 participants) published until February 2024. Meta-analysis was run using a random-effects model and Hedge's g used as effect size. Our results demonstrated a decrease in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) following AAE (g = 0.27; 95 % CI [0.16-0.38]; p <.0001), particularly for moderate (g = 0.18; 95 % CI [0.05-0.31]; p <.01) and high (g = 0.49; 95 % CI [0.27-0.71]; p <.0001) AAE intensities. These effects remained for 30 minutes after AAE. Additionally, increased corticospinal excitability was only observed for high intensity AAE (g = 0.28; 95 % CI, [0.07-0.48]; p <.01). Our results suggest potential mechanisms for inducing a more susceptible neuroplastic environment following AAE.

Modulation of the Association Between Corticospinal Tract Damage and Outcome After Stroke by White Matter Hyperintensities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Motor outcomes after stroke relate to corticospinal tract (CST) damage. The brain leverages surviving neural pathways to compensate for CST damage and mediate motor recovery. Thus, concurrent age-related damage from white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) might affect neurologic capacity for recovery after CST injury. The role of WMHs in post-stroke motor outcomes is unclear. In this study, we evaluated whether WMHs modulate the relationship between CST damage and post-stroke motor outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the multisite ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group with T1 and T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. CST damage was indexed with weighted CST lesion load (CST-LL). WMH volumes were extracted with Freesurfer's SAMSEG. Mixed-effects beta-regression models were fit to test the impact of CST-LL, WMH volume, and their interaction on motor impairment, controlling for age, days after stroke, and stroke volume. RESULTS: A total of 223 individuals were included. WMH volume related to motor impairment above and beyond CST-LL (ß = 0.178, 95% CI 0.025-0.331, p = 0.022). Relationships varied by WMH severity (mild vs moderate-severe). In individuals with mild WMHs, motor impairment related to CST-LL (ß = 0.888, 95% CI 0.604-1.172, p < 0.001) with a CST-LL × WMH interaction (ß = -0.211, 95% CI -0.340 to -0.026, p = 0.026). In individuals with moderate-severe WMHs, motor impairment related to WMH volume (ß = 0.299, 95% CI 0.008-0.590, p = 0.044), but did not significantly relate to CST-LL or a CST-LL × WMH interaction. DISCUSSION: WMHs relate to motor outcomes after stroke and modify relationships between motor impairment and CST damage. WMH-related damage may be under-recognized in stroke research as a factor contributing to variability in motor outcomes. Our findings emphasize the importance of brain structural reserve in motor outcomes after brain injury.