Solving the conundrum. A migrainous infarction or an infarct-induced migrainous attack?

Solving the conundrum between a migrainous infarction (MI) and an infarct-induced migrainous attack (MA) is challenging. A 35-year-old woman with previous history of migraine with visual auras was addressed for acute aphasia followed by progressive right hemibody paresthesia and then by positive visual symptoms in her right visual field. These phenomena were followed by a migrainous headache. A perfusion CT performed during symptoms showed an extended hypoperfusion in the left temporo-occipital region corresponding to a migraine during an aura attack. An ASL sequence brain MRI undertaken 12 hours later (while the patient was only cephalalgic) showed an area of diffuse hyper-perfusion in the left hemisphere. DWI sequence showed a left middle cerebral artery territory infarction. We believe our case was most likely to have been an infarct-induced MA. To conclude, it is crucial to rule out cerebral infarction in cases where a patient experiences an atypical aura even in the context of established migraine.

Acute hemichorea revealing atrial flutter.

Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) typically present with easily recognizable neurological focal deficits. Symptoms such as paroxysmal involuntary movements are not usually considered to be a manifestation of TIA. We report a case with video documentation of TIA due to permanent atrial flutter presenting as acute left hemichorea. To our knowledge, such a case has not yet been reported. The present case constitutes a crucial diagnostic challenge in neurological practice in order to prevent a high risk of subsequent ischemic stroke.

Impact of an intrahospital mobile thrombolysis team on 3-month clinical outcomes in patients benefiting from intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The benefits of thrombolysis in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (IS) are highly time-dependent. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical benefit, after 3 months, of an intrahospital mobile thrombolysis team (MTT) for thrombolysis in IS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 95 consecutive patients treated with IV tPA for acute IS at the neurology department of Rouen University Hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2015 were retrospectively identified. Patients who had benefited from mechanical thrombectomy or hemicraniectomy were excluded. The study compared 33 patients who had benefited from our MTT (thrombolysis whatever the location and as soon as possible by a specific nurse) with 62 patients treated in the usual way (thrombolysis only at the stroke unit). Management timescales, inhospital and 3-month clinical outcomes, and imaging data were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Demographic data and factors known to influence the clinical course after thrombolysis were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). However, use of the MTT allowed significant decreases in the median onset-to-treatment (OTT) time of 26min and median door-to-needle (DTN) time of 27min (P<0.001). The proportion of patients with a DTN time<60min was higher in the MTT group than in the usual care (UC) group: 64% vs. 14%, respectively (P<0.001), according to American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Although there was a smaller proportion of negative 3-month outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score: 6; 6% vs. 16%) and a larger proportion of highly favorable 3-month outcomes (mRS score: 0-1; 79% vs. 64%) in the MTT vs. UC groups, respectively, these differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Use of an MTT is a simple way to reduce thrombolysis delays, and the present results encourage us to improve the system to make it even more effective and available for all patients.