Fearlessness about death and suicide planning predict lethality of adolescent suicide attempts during and following treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of adolescent suicide attempt has increased drastically over the past 10 years. However, little is known regarding what predicts a more versus less lethal attempt, which is of critical interest to clinicians managing this at-risk population. We sought to extend the study of lethality in adolescents by exploring its relationship with two recognized risk-factors for suicide attempt: fearlessness about death (FAD) and suicide planning. METHODS: Participants (N = 254) were administered measures of FAD and depressive symptoms upon entering intensive outpatient treatment for adolescents exhibiting suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Attempts made between treatment entry and 6 months following discharge (n = 47) were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale of lethality. The resulting continuum ranged from no attempt to attempts of low to moderate levels of lethality. RESULTS: FAD and suicide planning distinguished between levels of lethality of future attempt at the bivariate and multivariate level. FAD's predictive relationship with lethality while controlling for age, sex, depression, and prior attempt diminished when suicide planning was covaried. CONCLUSION: FAD and suicide planning significantly predicted more versus less lethal future attempts in our sample of adolescents in a clinical setting. Our findings suggest that FAD influences the lethality of a future attempt by promoting planning for suicide. More studies are needed to assess whether the brief FAD scale might be a valuable adjunct in the clinical management of youth with suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

The effect of parent-adolescent discrepancies in reports of familial dysfunction and depression on suicidal ideation in adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Parents and adolescents are often discrepant in their reports of adolescent psychosocial factors. Few studies have addressed parent-adolescent discrepancies in subjective ratings of familial dysfunction and depression as longitudinal predictor variables, and none have done so in a treatment setting for adolescents with acute suicidality. This study examined how parent-adolescent discrepancies in familial dysfunction and depression impact adolescent treatment response in an intensive outpatient program for suicidality. METHODS: Adolescents (N = 315) were assessed at treatment entry and exit for familial dysfunction, depression, and suicidal ideation. Parents received parallel assessments of familial dysfunction and adolescent depression at each time point. A polynomial regression was conducted to determine whether parent-adolescent discrepancies in reports of familial dysfunction and depression at entry related to the treatment outcome of adolescent-reported depression and suicide ideation at exit. RESULTS: Significant discrepancies were present with on average adolescents reporting more depression and familial dysfunction than parents. Entry discrepancy in familial dysfunction (but not depression) predicted suicide ideation at exit. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that parent-adolescent discrepancies in perception of familial dysfunction is a risk factor for poor outcomes in suicidal youth and might be a fruitful target in treatment programs.

Predicting suicidal events: A comparison of the Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR) and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).

This report examines the predictive capabilities of two scales of suicidality in high-risk adolescents. Charts of adolescents with severe suicidality participating in an intensive outpatient program were reviewed. Self-report data from the 9-item Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR9) and clinician-completed data from the Columbia Suicide Severity Risk Scale (C-SSRS) were obtained at entry. Scales' performances in predicting suicide attempts and suicidal events were evaluated using logistic regression models and ROC analyses. Of 539 adolescents, 53 had events of which 19 were attempts. The CHRT-SR9 total score predicted events (OR=1.05) and attempts (OR=1.09), as did the C-SSRS Suicide Ideation (SI) Intensity Composite for events (OR=1.10) and attempts (OR=1.16). The CHRT-SR9 AUC was 0.70 (84.2% sensitivity; 41.7% specificity; PPV=5.0%; NPV=98.6%) for attempts. The C-SSRS Intensity Composite AUC was 0.62 (89.5% sensitivity; 24.1% specificity; PPV=4.2%; NPV=98.4%) for attempts. Both the CHRT-SR9 and C-SSRS capture important parameters related to suicidal events or attempts that can help assess suicidal risk in adolescents.

Borderline personality features influence treatment response to suicide prevention.

BACKGROUND: Suicide is a notable risk for individuals with features of borderline personality disorder. Given the centrality of interpersonal difficulties in this disorder, we proposed that the negative interpersonal cognitions (perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) identified by the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (IPTS) may explain the associations between suicidal ideation and borderline personality features. METHOD: Participants were 322 suicidal youth (74% girls) aged 11-18 years (M, SD = 14.74, 1.6) in an intensive outpatient program in the southwest United States. Youth completed measures assessing borderline personality features at program entry, and suicidal ideation and IPTS variables at entry and exit. RESULTS: Borderline personality features did not moderate associations of IPTS variables and suicidal ideation. For the entire sample, changes in suicidal ideation from entry to discharge occurred in tandem with changes in perceived burdensomeness and depressive symptoms, but not thwarted belongingness. Youth with elevated borderline personality features entered with greater suicidal ideation, but improved more from treatment entry to exit. Regardless of level of borderline personality features, changes in negative interpersonal cognitions over treatment were associated with changes in suicidal ideation. LIMITATIONS: Self-report measures and lack of sample diversity are study limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights the clinical utility of the IPTS variables and the importance of promoting competence and interpersonal connectedness when treating this population. Findings indicate that the IPTS variables carry the same fundamental information for contributing to suicidal ideation, regardless of level of borderline personality features.