Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circulation ; 131(23): 2032-40, 2015 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25948541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may significantly harm patients and may result from inappropriate clinical decision values (CDVs) for cardiac troponin (cTn) owing to limitations in the current regulatory process. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an international, prospective, multicenter study, we quantified the incidence of inconsistencies in the diagnosis of AMI using fully characterized and clinically available high-sensitivity (hs) cTn assays (hs-cTnI, Abbott; hs-cTnT, Roche) among 2300 consecutive patients with suspected AMI. We hypothesized that the approved CDVs for the 2 assays are not biologically equivalent and might therefore contribute to inconsistencies in the diagnosis of AMI. Findings were validated by use of sex-specific CDVs and parallel measurements of other hs-cTnI assays. AMI was the adjudicated diagnosis in 473 patients (21%). Among these, 86 patients (18.2%) had inconsistent diagnoses when the approved uniform CDV was used. When sex-specific CDVs were used, 14.1% of female and 22.7% of male AMI patients had inconsistent diagnoses. Using biologically equivalent CDV reduced inconsistencies to 10% (P<0.001). These findings were confirmed with parallel measurements of other hs-cTn assays. The incidence of inconsistencies was only 7.0% for assays with CDVs that were nearly biologically equivalent. Patients with inconsistent AMI had long-term mortality comparable to that of patients with consistent diagnoses (P=NS) and a trend toward higher long-term mortality than patients diagnosed with unstable angina (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Currently approved CDVs are not biologically equivalent and contribute to major inconsistencies in the diagnosis of AMI. One of 5 AMI patients will receive a diagnosis other than AMI if managed with the alternative hs-cTn assay. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Troponina I/sangue , Troponina T/sangue , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Cooperação Internacional , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Valores de Referência , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Circulation ; 126(1): 31-40, 2012 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22623715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and its early change are useful in distinguishing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from acute cardiac noncoronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective, international multicenter study, hs-cTn was measured with 3 assays (hs-cTnT, Roche Diagnostics; hs-cTnI, Beckman-Coulter; hs-cTnI Siemens) in a blinded fashion at presentation and serially thereafter in 887 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Accuracy of the combination of presentation values with serial changes was compared against a final diagnosis adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. AMI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 127 patients (15%); cardiac noncoronary artery disease, in 124 (14%). Patients with AMI had higher median presentation values of hs-cTnT (0.113 µg/L [interquartile range, 0.049-0.246 µg/L] versus 0.012 µg/L [interquartile range, 0.006-0.034 µg/L]; P<0.001) and higher absolute changes in hs-cTnT in the first hour (0.019 µg/L [interquartile range, 0.007-0.067 µg/L] versus 0.001 µg/L [interquartile range, 0-0.003 µg/L]; P<0.001) than patients with cardiac noncoronary artery disease. Similar findings were obtained with the hs-cTnI assays. Adding changes of hs-cTn in the first hour to its presentation value yielded a diagnostic accuracy for AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.94 for hs-cTnT (0.92 for both hs-cTnI assays). Algorithms using ST-elevation, presentation values, and changes in hs-cTn in the first hour accurately separated patients with AMI and those with cardiac noncoronary artery disease. These findings were confirmed when the final diagnosis was readjudicated with the use of hs-cTnT values and validated in an independent validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The combined use of hs-cTn at presentation and its early absolute change excellently discriminates between patients with AMI and those with cardiac noncoronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Troponina T/sangue , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa