RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 'discharge letter' is the mandatory written report sent from specialists in the specialist services to general practitioners (GPs) on patient discharge. Clear recommendations from relevant stakeholders for contents of discharge letters and instruments to measure the quality of discharge letters in mental healthcare are needed. The objectives were to (1) detect which information relevant stakeholders defined as important to include in discharge letters from mental health specialist services, (2) develop a checklist to measure the quality of discharge letters and (3) test the psychometric properties of the checklist. METHODS: We used a stepwise multimethod stakeholder-centred approach. Group interviews with GPs, mental health specialists and patient representatives defined 68 information items with 10 consensus-based thematic headings relevant to include in high-quality discharge letters. Information items rated as highly important by GPs (n=50) were included in the Quality of Discharge information-Mental Health (QDis-MH) checklist. The 26-item checklist was tested by GPs (n=18) and experts in healthcare improvement or health services research (n=15). Psychometric properties were assessed using estimates of intrascale consistency and linear mixed effects models. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC1) and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The QDis-MH checklist had satisfactory intrascale consistency. Inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate, and test-retest reliability was moderate. In descriptive analyses, mean checklist scores were higher in the category of discharge letters defined as 'good' than in 'medium' or 'poor' letters, but differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: GPs, mental health specialists and patient representatives defined 26 information items relevant to include in discharge letters in mental healthcare. The QDis-MH checklist is valid and feasible. However, when using the checklist, raters should be trained and the number of raters kept to a minimum due to questionable inter-rater reliability.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Mental , Alta do Paciente , Humanos , Lista de Checagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
Studies suggest that maternal diabetes can cause both placental insufficiency and exaggerated foetal growth. Pregnant mothers with diabetes have suffered high risk of losing their child. Data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway show a decrease in the still birth rate from 16th week of gestation from 115.7 per 1,000 in 1967-75 to 12.8 in 1986-92 in the diabetes groups. The relative risks were 7.8 and 1.4 respectively for the two time periods. The early neonatal mortality rate decreased correspondingly. The proportion of Caesarean sections in mothers with diabetes, and the proportion of children with low birth weight or born prematurely also increased in the diabetes group. However, children in the diabetes group were on average still as big at gestational age in the most recent period as in the first period. Our data suggest that the improved metabolic control of maternal diabetes has reduced the occurrence and degree of placental insufficiency, with inherent decreases in mortality and risk of complications, but without reducing the foetal growth-stimulating effect of maternal diabetes.