Analysis of factors associated with outcome in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal center.

AIM: To define the indications for hyperthermic isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) in patients with unresectable liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) with particular focus on IHP's utility as a second-line option for patients whose tumors have progressed following combination systemic chemotherapy treatment. METHODS: From June 1994 through July 2005, 120 patients with unresectable CRC LM underwent IHP with melphalan (n = 69), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (n = 10) or both (n = 41). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine started 6-8 weeks post IHP in 46 (38%). Patients were followed for toxicity, radiographic response, and overall survival (OS). Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare parameters by response category; survival and hepatic progression-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 79 males and 41 females, 96 (80%) received prior chemotherapy. There were five (4%) operative/treatment mortalities. There were 69 responses in 114 evaluable patients (61%). Total melphalan dose and combination melphalan/TNF were each associated with response; age, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prior chemotherapy for established LM, tumor burden, and post-IHP HAI therapy were not. Median overall survival was 17.4 months and 2-year survival was 34%. Factors found to be independently related to survival were preoperative CEA <30 ng/mL and use of post-IHP HAI (P < 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: IHP results in marked tumor regression and prolonged survival in patients with CRC LM. Continued development of IHP in this clinical setting is warranted.

Hyperthermic isolated hepatic perfusion using melphalan for patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to liver.

PURPOSE: Liver metastases are the sole or life-limiting component of disease in the majority of patients with ocular melanoma who recur. Because median survival after diagnosis of liver metastases is short and no satisfactory treatment options exist, we have conducted clinical trials evaluating isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) for patients afflicted with this condition. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-nine patients (male: 14, female: 15; mean age, 49 years) with unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma were treated with a 60-min hyperthermic IHP using 1.5 mg/kg of melphalan (mean total dose 105 mg). Via laparotomy, perfusion inflow was established with a cannula in the gastroduodenal artery and outflow via a cannula positioned in an isolated segment of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava. Portal and infra-renal inferior vena cava blood flow was shunted externally to the axillary vein using a veno-veno bypass circuit. Patients were assessed for toxicity, radiographic response, and survival. RESULTS: There was no treatment related mortality and transient grade 3/4 hepatic toxicity was observed in 19 patients (65%). Mean length of operation and hospital stay was 8.3 h and 10 days, respectively. There were 3 (10%) complete responses (duration: 12, 14+, 15 months) and 15 partial responses (52%; mean duration: 10 months). The initial site of disease progression included liver in 17 of 25 patients (68%) who recurred. At a median follow-up of 30.7 months the median actuarial progression-free and overall survivals were 8 and 12.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IHP with melphalan alone results in significant regression of established liver metastases for patients with ocular melanoma. However, after IHP, disease progression is most commonly observed in the liver, and survival after disease progression is short. On the basis of a pattern of tumor progression predominantly in liver, continued clinical evaluation of hepatic directed therapy in this patient population is justified.

Isolated hepatic perfusion for the treatment of patients with advanced liver metastases from pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: We report results of using isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) in patients with advanced progressive liver metastases (LM) from pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). METHODS: Thirteen patients with LM from NENs (mean percent hepatic replacement, 30; range, 10-60) were treated with a 1-hour hyperthermic IHP via a laparotomy with the use of 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg melphalan and/or 1 mg tumor necrosis factor. An oxygenated extracorporeal circuit with inflow through the gastroduodenal artery and common hepatic artery, and outflow to a segment of the inferior vena cava was used. Portal flow and inferior vena cava flow were shunted to the axillary vein. Radiographic response, recurrence pattern, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 9 hours (8-11 hours), and a median hospital stay was 10 days (6-64 days). Fifty percent of evaluable patients had a radiographic partial response in the liver (mean duration, 15 months; range, 6-26 months; 2 ongoing). Four had a marginal response (25%-49% reduction in the neoplasm). The median, hepatic, progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 3-27 months). The median actuarial survival was 48 months including 1 treatment mortality (median follow-up, 23 months). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with advanced LM from NENs, IHP provides a reasonable response rate and duration with acceptable morbidity; continued clinical evaluation is important.

Treatment of patients with unresectable primary hepatic malignancies using hyperthermic isolated hepatic perfusion.

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a regional treatment technique that isolates the organ to allow delivery of high-dose chemotherapy, biological agents, and hyperthermia directly to unresectable cancers confined to the liver. This study presents our experience using IHP with melphalan with or without tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of hepatobiliary origin. Nine patients with unresectable primary hepatic malignancies underwent a 60-minute IHP with 1.5 mg/kg melphalan with or without 1.0 mg TNF. Four patients failed one or more previous treatment regimens, and the mean hepatic replacement by tumor was 41% (range 10% to 75%). Patients were monitored for response, toxicity, time to recurrence, and survival. Six (67%) of nine patients experienced greater than 50% regression of tumor by objective radiographic imaging and an additional patient had a 45% reduction in tumor burden. Mean time to progression was 7.7 months for those who responded to treatment. Patients who had a response to therapy had an average overall survival of 16.3 months. IHP can be performed safely and has significant antitumor activity in patients with unresectable primary hepatic malignancies. Hepatic progression continues to be the dominant factor influencing survival in this group of patients.

A phase I trial of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir in adults with solid tumors.

Nelfinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor being repurposed as an anti-cancer agent in preclinical models and in small oncology trials, yet the MTD of nelfinavir has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted a Phase Ia study to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of nelfinavir in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Adults with refractory cancers were given oral nelfinavir twice daily with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled. Nelfinavir was generally well tolerated. Common adverse events included diarrhea, anemia, and lymphopenia, which were mostly mild. The DLT was rapid-onset neutropenia that was reversible. The MTD was established at 3125 mg twice daily. In an expansion cohort at the MTD, one of 11 (9%) evaluable subjects had a confirmed partial response. This, plus two minor responses, occurred in subjects with neuroendocrine tumors of the midgut or pancreatic origin. Thirty-six percent of subjects had stable disease for more than 6 months. In peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Nelfinavir inhibited AKT and induced markers of ER stress. In summary, nelfinavir is well tolerated in cancer patients at doses 2.5 times the FDA-approved dose for HIV management and showed preliminary activity in tumors of neuroendocrine origin.

Isolated hepatic perfusion for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after irinotecan-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan given with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin is currently used as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the response duration is <1 year, and second-line systemic chemotherapy has limited efficacy. We analyzed the efficacy of isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) for patients with progressive CRC liver metastases after irinotecan. METHODS: Between March 1993 and February 2003, 124 patients with CRC liver metastases underwent IHP on institutional review board-approved protocols. The overall treatment mortality was 4% (5 of 124). Twenty-five patients (10 women and 15 men; mean age, 53 years) were identified who had progressive liver metastases by carcinoembryonic antigen, imaging studies, or both after irinotecan. A 1-hour hyperthermic IHP (mean hepatic temperature, 40.0 degrees C) with melphalan 1.5 mg/kg (mean total dose, 100 mg) was administered via laparotomy. Perfusion with an oxygenated extracorporeal circuit was established with inflow via a cannula in the gastroduodenal artery and common hepatic artery inflow occlusion. Outflow was via a cannula in an isolated segment of the inferior vena cava. During IHP, portal and inferior vena caval flow were shunted to the axillary vein. Patients were assessed for radiographical response, recurrence pattern, and survival. RESULTS: The mean number of prior irinotecan cycles in 25 patients was 6 (range, 2-14), and it was given primarily as second-line therapy. The median number of liver metastases before IHP was 10 (range, 1-50), and the median percentage of hepatic replacement by tumor was 25%. The mean operative time was 9 hours (range, 6-12 hours), and the median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 8-76 days). There was 1 complete response and there were 14 partial responses in 25 patients (60%), with a median duration of 12 months (range, 5-35 months). Disease progressed systemically in 13 of 25 patients at a median of 5 months (range, 3-16 months). The median overall survival was 12 months (range, 1-47 months), and the 2-year survival was 28%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with progressive CRC liver metastases after irinotecan, IHP has good efficacy in terms of response rate and duration. Continued evaluation of IHP with melphalan as second-line therapy in this clinical setting is justified.

Hepatic vascular isolation and perfusion for patients with progressive unresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma refractory to previous systemic and regional chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with colorectal carcinoma develop unresectable metastases confined to the liver that remain the life-limiting component of disease despite best available systemic or regional chemotherapy. In the current study, the authors present their results using vascular isolation and perfusion of the liver for individuals with progressive, unresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma that were refractory to both previous systemic and regional chemotherapy. METHODS: Seven patients with refractory, progressive, unresectable colorectal carcinoma metastases confined to the liver underwent a 60-minute hyperthermic (39-40 degrees C) isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) and were followed for toxicity, response, and survival. RESULTS: There was no surgical- or treatment-related mortality; all patients experienced transient Grade 3-4 (according to National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) hepatic toxicity. At a median potential follow-up of 16 months, the overall objective radiographic response rate (all partial responses) was 71% (5 of 7 assessable patients). It is interesting to note that two patients who were treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alone demonstrated no response to therapy compared with all five patients who were treated with melphalan and TNF (three patients) or melphalan alone (two patients). For the 5 patients who responded to treatment, the median duration of response was 10 months (range, 10-13 months) and in all 7 patients the mean overall survival was 19.7 months (range, 2-33 months), including 5 months and 7.5 months, respectively, for the 2 patients treated with TNF alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrate that IHP using melphalan with or without TNF has significant antitumor activity in this patient population. IHP deserves continued clinical evaluation as a therapeutic modality for patients with unresectable colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver.