Retrospective Data Analysis of the Use of an Autologous Multilayered Leukocyte, Platelet, and Fibrin Patch for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treatment in Daily Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the healing outcome of chronic, hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated with an autologous multilayered leukocyte, platelet, and fibrin (MLPF) patch in addition to the best standard of care, in a real-world clinical setting of two US amputation preventive centers. METHODS: In this retrospective study of patients treated between September 2021 and October 2022, the authors analyzed DFU healing outcomes based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection-derived amputation risk. RESULTS: All 36 patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and 29 (81%) were male. Their average age was 61.4 years, body mass index was 29.2 kg/m2, and glycated hemoglobin was 7.9. Twenty-seven patients (78%) were diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease, 20 (56%) underwent a peripheral vascular procedure, 15 (42%) had a prior amputation, and 6 (17%) were on hemodialysis. Average wound size was 4.9 cm2, and wound age was 9.5 months. Twelve patients (32%) were classified as low risk, 15 (39%) as moderate risk, and 11 (29%) as high risk for amputation. Within 12 weeks of the first MLPF patch application, nine wounds (24%) healed. After 20 weeks, 23 wounds (61%) were closed, and by follow-up, 30 wounds (79%) healed. No amputations were noted. Compared with published data, 40% fewer patients underwent readmission within 30 days, with 72% shorter admission duration. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world clinical experiences using the MLPF patch to treat hard-to-heal DFUs resulted in the majority of wounds healing. Few patients experienced a readmission within 30 days, and the average admission duration was short.

The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and wound care.

In the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, the critical limb ischemia (CLI) Global Society aims to develop improved clinical guidance that will inform better care standards to reduce tissue loss and amputations during and following the new SARS-CoV-2 era. This will include developing standards of practice, improve gaps in care, and design improved research protocols to study new chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment and diagnostic options. Following a round table discussion that identified hypotheses and suppositions the wound care community had during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the CLI Global Society undertook a critical review of literature using PubMed to confirm or rebut these hypotheses, identify knowledge gaps, and analyse the findings in terms of what in wound care has changed due to the pandemic and what wound care providers need to do differently as a result of these changes. Evidence was graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scheme. The majority of hypotheses and related suppositions were confirmed, but there is noticeable heterogeneity, so the experiences reported herein are not universal for wound care providers and centres. Moreover, the effects of the dynamic pandemic vary over time in geographic areas. Wound care will unlikely return to prepandemic practices. Importantly, Levels 2-5 evidence reveals a paradigm shift in wound care towards a hybrid telemedicine and home healthcare model to keep patients at home to minimize the number of in-person visits at clinics and hospitalizations, with the exception of severe cases such as chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The use of telemedicine and home care will likely continue and improve in the postpandemic era.