Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 11(4): 992-997, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044510

RESUMO

Assessment of meaningfulness in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging, particularly in early disease. Converting clinical outcomes to disease progression time allows assessment of treatment effects using a metric that is understandable and meaningful: time. We demonstrate time savings assessments using meta time component tests (TCTs) in the LipiDiDiet multinutrient RCT. Dietary patterns are important for dementia prevention, likely due to individual cumulative nutrient effects. LipiDiDiet used a multinutrient (Fortasyn Connect) formulation in patients with prodromal AD, benefitting cognition (5-item composite NTB, effect 0.089), cognition and function (CDR-SB, -0.605), and slowing hippocampal atrophy (0.122 cm3). Meaningfulness of point differences is unclear. However, a combination TCT showed 9-month disease time savings at 24 months (38% slowing of disease time): 9.0, 10.5, and 7.2 months for NTB, CDR-SB, and hippocampal volume, underscoring the value of TCTs in AD RCTs and the need for continued validation of this approach.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Humanos , Progressão da Doença , Idoso , Feminino , Masculino , Cognição/fisiologia , Hipocampo/patologia
2.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 11(5): 1219-1227, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39350367

RESUMO

Recent positive results of three phase III anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody trials are transforming the landscape of disease-modifying therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease, following several decades of failures. Indeed, all three trials have met their primary endpoints. However, the absolute size of the benefit measured in these trials has generated a debate on whether the change scores observed on clinical outcome assessments represent a clinically meaningful benefit to patients. An evidence-based conclusion is urgently required to inform decision-making related to the approval, reimbursement, and ultimately, the management of emerging therapies in clinical practice. The EU-US CTAD Task Force met in Boston to address this important question. The current state-of-the-art knowledge for interpreting clinical meaningfulness of AD clinical trial results, including the point of view of patients and study partners on what is clinically meaningful, was discussed and is summarized here. A combination of methodologies to address the challenges emerged. There remain gaps in the understanding of clinical meaningfulness that only long-term longitudinal studies will be able to address.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comitês Consultivos
3.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 10(3): 464-470, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357286

RESUMO

The LipiDiDiet randomized clinical trial is evaluating the long term effects of a multinutrient intervention (Fortasyn Connect) compared with control in participants with prodromal AD. In this post-hoc analysis we used the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) as a measure of cognition and global function, together with a global statistical test (GST) and Bayesian hierarchical modelling (BHM) to evaluate the totality of evidence for an effect of the intervention over 36 months. The analysis includes 67 participants (39 active, 28 control) with change from baseline data after 36 months intervention. All outcome measures showed a statistically significant effect for the intervention: ADCOMS (P =0.045), GST (P <0.001), and BHM (P =0.008 based on 3 outcomes and P <0.001 including all primary and secondary quantitative clinical outcomes). Fortasyn Connect was associated with significantly less clinical decline over 36 months, suggesting the long-lasting beneficial effects of the multinutrient in prodromal AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cognição
4.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 6(4): 232-236, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31686094

RESUMO

As research evolves in prodromal AD, the need to validate sufficiently sensitive outcome measures, e.g. the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) is clear. In the LipiDiDiet randomized trial in prodromal AD, cognitive decline in the study population was much less than expected in the timeframe studied. While the primary composite endpoint was insufficiently sensitive to detect a difference in the modified intention to treat population, the per-protocol population showed less decline in the active than the control group, indicating better treatment effects with regular product intake. These results were further strengthened by significant benefits on secondary endpoints of cognition and function, and brain atrophy. The present post-hoc analysis investigated whether ADCOMS could detect a difference between groups in the LipiDiDiet population (138 active, 140 control). The estimated mean change in ADCOMS from baseline (standard error) was 0.085 (0.018) in the active and 0.133 (0.018) in the control group; estimated mean treatment difference -0.048 (95% confidence intervals -0.090, -0.007; p=0.023), or 36% less decline in the active group. This suggests ADCOMS identified the cognitive and functional benefits observed previously, confirming the sensitivity of this composite measure.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/uso terapêutico , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fosfolipídeos/uso terapêutico , Sintomas Prodrômicos , Doença de Alzheimer/fisiopatologia , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Cognição , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
6.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 3(2): 101-104, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29210445

RESUMO

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are a physiological measure of cognitive function that have shown diagnostic and prognostic utility in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we used a novel eigenvector-based technique to better understand brain electrophysiological differences between subjects with mild AD and healthy controls (HC). Using ERPs from 75 subjects with mild AD and 95 HC, we first calculated cognitive task eigenvectors within each subject from three conditions and then calculated second-order eigenvector components to compare the AD group to the HC group. A MANOVA of the three second-level components discriminated between AD and HC multivariately (Wilks' lambda=.4297, p<0.0001, R2 = .5703), and also on each of the three components univariately (all 3 p-values<0.0001). The eigenvector-based technique used in this study accurately discriminated between the mild AD group and HC. As such, this analysis method adds to our understanding of the differences in ERP signal between AD and HC, and could provide a sensitive biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of AD progression.

8.
Neurology ; 76(3): 280-6, 2011 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21178097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large number of promising candidate disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD) continue to advance into phase II and phase III testing. However, most completed trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy, and there is growing concern that methodologic difficulties may contribute to these clinical trial failures. The optimal time to intervene with such treatments is probably in the years prior to the onset of dementia, before the neuropathology has progressed to the advanced stage corresponding to clinical dementia. METHOD: An international task force of individuals from academia, industry, nonprofit foundations, and regulatory agencies was convened to discuss optimal trial design in early (predementia) AD. RESULTS: General consensus was reached on key principles involving the scope of the AD diagnosis, the selection of subjects for trials, outcome measures, and analytical methods. CONCLUSION: A consensus has been achieved in support of the testing of candidate treatments in the early (predementia) AD population.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Comitês Consultivos , Doença de Alzheimer/sangue , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Alzheimer/patologia , Proteínas Amiloidogênicas/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Consenso , Progressão da Doença , Donepezila , Indústria Farmacêutica , Diagnóstico Precoce , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Indanos/uso terapêutico , Cooperação Internacional , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Seleção de Pacientes , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Projetos de Pesquisa , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vitamina E/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa