RESUMO
PURPOSE: There is little information on the supportive care offered to breast cancer patients. We investigated the association between the marginalization index and selected services offered by health professionals. METHODS: We used data from a cross-sectional parent study performed in Mexico from 2007 to 2009. We analyzed data from 832 women between 35 and 69 years of age with a histopathological diagnosis of breast cancer. This study was performed in hospitals in 5 states. We used frequencies, measures of central tendency, and logistic regression. We used the svy package of STATA statistical software v17. RESULTS: Overall, 15.6% of the study population reported that health professionals offered them selected services. The offer of two or more selected services was greater among women living in states with a very high marginalization index (21.8%) than among those living in states with a very low marginalization index (13.8%). Among women living in states with high marginalization, the odds of receiving a selected service offer were 2.03 times higher than those living in states with low marginalization (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.03, 95% CI 1.08-3.83). For women in the highest tertile of the asset index, the odds of receiving a selected service offer were 2.7 times greater than the odds for women in the lowest tertile (OR = 2.66, 95% CI 1.03-6.88). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of comprehensive care offered to breast cancer patients is low in Mexico and varies according to the marginalization index and the asset index.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Estudos Transversais , México/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) among female commercial sex workers in Cuautla, Morelos, Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 1998, in the red-light district of Cuautla, Morelos, Mexico. It included 100 female commercial sex workers who labored permanently in bars and night clubs. Data were collected using two questionnaires, one on socio-demographic characteristics, and the other on commercial sex, risk perception, and knowledge on preventive measures and contagion of sexually transmitted diseases/AIDS. Blood and cervicovaginal specimens were also collected to assess the prevalence of sexually transmitted and reproductive system infections (RSI). Outcome variables were STI (syphilis and chlamydiasis) and RSI (vaginosis and candidiasis). RESULTS: Sexually transmitted prevalence was of 11%, reproductive system infections prevalence was of 39%. When candidiasis was included in the sexually transmitted infections group, prevalence was of 31%. The main factors associated with sexually transmitted infections were: who instructed on condom use, time having intercourse with partner, and years of commercial sex work. Factors related to reproductive system infections were: illiteracy, use of condom with partner, who instructed on condom use, and years of commercial sex work. Multivariate analysis showed an increased likelihood of acquiring a sexually transmitted infection and/or reproductive system infection with illiteracy, instruction on condom use by a person other than a healthcare worker, and lack of condom use. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of condoms during intercourse is the most important preventive measure to avoid and control STI and RSI. Study findings pinpoint spatial and temporal factors that contribute to infection. Intervention measures directed at these factors should strengthen preventive and educational programs to improve medical care for these infections.