Outcomes of Impella 5.0 and 5.5 for cardiogenic shock: A single-center 137 patient experience.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) supported with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and identified risk factors for in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Adults with CS who were supported with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified into three groups according to their CS etiology: (1) acute myocardial infarction (AMI), (2) acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and (3) postcardiotomy (PC). The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes included adverse events during Impella support and length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with CS secondary to AMI (n = 47), ADHF (n = 86), and PC (n = 4) were included. The ADHF group had the highest survival rates at all time points. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common complication during Impella support in all 3 groups. Increased rates of AKI and de novo renal replacement therapy were observed in the PC group, and the AMI group experienced a higher incidence of bleeding requiring transfusion. Multivariable analysis demonstrated diabetes mellitus, elevated pre-insertion serum lactate, and elevated pre-insertion serum creatinine were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, but the etiology of CS did not impact mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Impella 5.0 and 5.5 provide effective mechanical support for patients with CS with favorable outcomes, with nearly two-thirds of patients alive at 180 days. Diabetes, elevated pre-insertion serum lactate, and elevated pre-insertion serum creatinine are strong risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Outcomes in Patients With LVADs Undergoing Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown better outcomes for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (sHKT) than for isolated orthotopic heart transplant (iOHT) in recipients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, outcomes in patients supported by durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well studied. METHODS: Patients with durable LVADs and stage 3 or higher CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) undergoing iOHT or sHKT between 2008 and 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with associated log-rank test was conducted to compare post-transplant survival rates. Multivariable modeling was used to identify risk-adjusted predictors of 1 year post-transplant mortality. RESULTS: We identified 4375 patients; 366 underwent sHKT, and 4009 underwent iOHT. The frequency of sHKT increased during the study period. The 1-year post-transplant survival rate was worse in patients after sHKT than in patients after iOHT (80.3% vs 88.3%; P < 0.001) and persisted up to 5 years post-transplant (P = 0.001). sHKT recipients were more likely to require dialysis after transplantation and had longer hospital lengths of stay (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that sHKT remained an independent risk factor for mortality at 1 year (OR 1.58; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: sHKT is becoming more common in patients with durable LVADs. Compared with iOHT, patients with sHKTs have worse short- and long-term survival rates and are more likely to require post-transplant dialysis.

Revascularization Strategies for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the Elderly Population.

BACKGROUND: Prospective trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of multivessel coronary disease (MVCAD) have included mostly younger patients. We compared treatment strategies in the elderly population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a propensity-score-matched comparison of patients ≥75 y who underwent isolated CABG or PCI for MVCAD between 2011 and 2018, excluding those with prior cardiac surgery and/or significant left main disease. The primary outcome was 5-year Kaplan Meier survival, and secondary outcomes included readmissions and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Propensity-matching yielded 536 patients (266 PCI and 266 CABG). Rates of complete revascularization of all stenotic lesions were higher in the CABG arm (86.8% versus 21.8%; P < 0.001). Thirty-d mortality was similar between cohorts, though PCI recipients had shorter hospital stay and greater likelihood of discharge to home. Unadjusted one- (89.1% versus 88.4%) and 5-year (73.8% versus 60.1%) survival were both higher in patients who underwent CABG (P = 0.0332). Patients undergoing CABG had reduced, but nonsignificant cumulative incidence of all-cause hospital readmission and MACCE at 5 y. Subgroup analysis of patients 80 y or older revealed similar late survival benefit with CABG when compared to PCI. Among patients undergoing CABG, there did not appear to be any 5-year benefits from multi-arterial grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer hospitalization and higher rate of nonhome discharge, CABG was associated with improved late survival over PCI in the elderly population. Cardiac surgeons should be included in the multidisciplinary evaluation of older patients with MVCAD.

HVAD versus heartmate III bridge to heart transplantation: Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study compared outcomes of patients bridged with either the Heartware HVAD or Heartmate 3 (HM3) device to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was queried to perform two separate analyses of adult, isolated OHT candidates bridged with HVAD or HM3. First, waitlist outcomes were compared among patients waitlisted 1/1/2015-3/20/2020. Second, posttransplant survival was compared among those transplanted 1/1/2015-3/20/2020. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-five candidates were waitlisted within the study period, 1587 (70.4%) bridged with HVAD and 668 (29.6%) with HM3. At 1 year from waitlisting, cumulative incidence of OHT higher in the HVAD cohort (p < .001). During the same time period, 2643 patients underwent OHT, 2154 (81.5%) with prior HVAD and 489 (18.5%) with HM3. Yearly proportions of patients bridged with HM3 increased across the study period and decreased for HVAD (p < .001). HM3-bridged recipients had shorter waitlist times, longer graft cold ischemic times, and experienced a higher rate of posttransplant dialysis requirement. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted posttransplant mortality rates were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant survival is equivalent regardless of device type used for bridging. However, HM3 patients had lower likelihood of reaching transplantation, which may be a reflection of the recent heart allocation policy changes.

Geographic disparities in heart transplantation persist under the new allocation policy.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on geographic disparities in United States orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to measure geographic disparity in OHT rates between pre-policy and post-policy change eras. We performed multilevel Poisson regression to measure region-level OHT rates. We derived an allocation priority-adjusted median incidence rate ratio (MIRR) for each policy era, a measure of median change in OHT rates between regions. RESULTS: 5958.78 waitlist person-years were analyzed, comprising 6596 OHT procedures (3890 pre-policy and 2706 post-policy). Median region-level OHT rate was .94 transplants/person-years before and 1.51 transplants/person-years after the policy change (P < .001). The unadjusted OHT MIRR across regions was 1.29 (95% CI 1.00-1.50) pre-policy change and 1.17 (95% CI 1.00-1.43) post-policy change, suggesting that the region-related variance in OHT rates decreased under the new allocation. After adjustment for allocation priority risk factors, the MIRR pre-policy change was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.32) and post-policy change was 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Geography accounts for ∼10% of the disparity among United States OHT rates. Despite broader heart sharing, the updated allocation policy did not substantially alter the existing geographic disparities among OHT recipients.

Utilization and outcomes of postcardiotomy mechanical circulatory support.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the utilization and outcomes of postcardiotomy mechanical circulatory support (MCS). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single institution analysis of adult cardiac surgery cases that required de novo MCS following surgery from 2011 to 2018. Patients that were bridged with MCS to surgery were excluded. The primary outcomes were early operative mortality and longitudinal survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, and 5-year all-cause readmission. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-three patients required de novo postcardiotomy MCS, with the most commonly performed procedure being isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (29.8%). Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 185 (IQR 123-260) min and 122 (IQR 81-179) min, respectively. A total of 442 (82.9%) of patients were supported with intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, 23 (4.3%) with an Impella device, and 115 (21.6%) with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Three (0.6%) patients had an unplanned ventricular assist device placed. Operative mortality was 29.8%. Longitudinal survival was 56.1% and 43.0% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Survival was lowest in those supported with ECMO and highest with those supported with an Impella (p < 0.001). Freedom from readmission was 61.4% at 5 years. Postoperative ECMO was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.0-12.9, p < 0.001), but none of the MCS types predicted long-term hospital readmission after risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Postcardiotomy MCS is associated with high operative mortality. Even patients that survive to discharge have compromised longitudinal survival, with nearly only half surviving to 1 year. Close follow-up and early referral to advanced heart failure specialists may be prudent in improving these outcomes.

Impact of various sizing metrics on female donor to male recipient heart transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of various sizing metrics on outcomes of female donor to male recipient orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: We queried the United Network of Organ Sharing database to analyze all isolated, primary adult OHTs from January 1, 2010 to January 20, 020. Patients were stratified by donor-recipient sex pairing. Logistic regression was used to investigate risk-adjusted effects of current size matching criteria (weight ratio, body mass index [BMI] ratio, predicted heart mass [pHM] ratio) on 1-year posttransplant mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare posttransplant survival among cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 22,450 patients were analyzed, of which 3019 (13.4%) underwent female-to-male transplantation. Of sex-matched pairs, female-to-male donation had the lowest proportion of undersized hearts using weight and BMI ratio metrics (10.5% and 5.2%) but had the highest proportion of undersizing using pHM metrics (48.1%) (all p < 0.001). Female-to-male recipients had the lowest rate of unadjusted 1-year survival (90.0%, p = 0.0169), and increased hazards of mortality after risk adjustment (odds ratio [OR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.36, p = 0.034). Undersizing using pHM (donor-recipient ratio <0.85) was the only metric found to be associated in increased mortality after risk adjustment (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.71, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Female-to-male heart transplantation has the worst survival of all sex-matching combinations. Although female donors in this cohort are appropriately sized using traditional metrics, half are under-sized using pHM. This, combined with its strong association with mortality, underscores the importance of routine pHM assessment when evaluating female donors for male recipients.

Preoperative troponin levels and outcomes of coronary surgery following myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the impact of peak preoperative troponin level on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing isolated CABG from 2011 to 2018 with the presentation of NSTEMI. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups based on median preoperative peak troponin (1.95 ng/dl). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality were compared. Multivariable analysis was performed to model risk factors for MACCE and mortality. RESULTS: This study included 1211 patients, 607 low-risk (≤1.95 ng/dl) and 604 high-risk (>1.95 ng/dl). Patients were well-matched with respect to age and comorbidity. High-risk patients had lower median preoperative ejection fraction (46.5% [interquartile range {IQR}: 35.0%-55.0%] vs. 53.0% [IQR: 40.0%-58.0%]) and higher incidence of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (15.9% vs. 8.73%). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were longer in the high-risk group, but increasing troponin level was not associated with prolonged intensive care or hospital length of stay (>4 and >14 days, respectively) after risk adjustment. Postoperative complications and 30-day, 1- and 5-year rates of both MACCE and survival were similar between groups. Peak troponin greater than 1.95 ng/dl was not associated with increased hazards for MACCE, mortality, or readmission in multivariable modeling. In subanalysis, neither increasing troponin as a continuous variable nor peak troponin greater than 10.00 ng/ml were associated with increased hazards for these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative troponin levels do not appear to be predictive of short- or long-term outcomes following CABG, and clinical decisions regarding surgical revascularization should not be dictated by these measurements.

Changes in multiorgan heart transplants following the 2018 allocation policy change.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of the heart allocation policy change in 2018 on the characteristics and outcomes of multiorgan transplants involving heart allografts. METHODS: Adults undergoing multiorgan heart transplantation from 2010 to 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. Transplants were stratified into occurring before versus after the October 2018 heart allocation change. The primary outcome was 1-year survival following transplantation. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of the allocation policy change on outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1832 patients underwent multiorgan heart transplantation during the study period with 245 (13.37%) undergoing heart-lung transplantation, 244 (13.32%) undergoing heart-liver transplantation, and 1343 (73.31%) undergoing heart-kidney transplantation. There was a higher utilization of temporary MCSDs as well as longer ischemic times for all three types of transplantation following the policy change. Heart-lung and heart-liver recipients had a similar 1-year survival before and after the policy change (each p > .05). Renal failure requiring dialysis (29.5% vs. 39.4%, p = .001) as well as 1-year survival (88% vs. 82%; log-rank p = .01) were worse in the heart-kidney cohort after the organ allocation system modification. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar trends in multiorgan transplants as has been observed in isolated heart transplants following the allocation change, including more frequent utilization of temporary mechanical support and longer ischemic times. Although outcomes have remained comparable in the new allocation era with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants, heart-kidney recipients have a worse 1-year survival following the change.

Impact of center donor acceptance patterns on utilization of extended-criteria donors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of transplanting center donor acceptance patterns on usage of extended-criteria donors (ECDs) and posttransplant outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried to identify heart donor offers and adult, isolated OHT recipients in the United States from January 1, 2013 to October 17, 2018. Centers were stratified into three equal-size terciles based on donor heart acceptance rates (<13.7%, 13.7%-20.2%, >20.2%). Overall survival was compared between recipients of ECDs (≥40 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <60%, distance ≥500 miles, hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV], or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], or ≥50 refusals) and recipients of traditional-criteria donors, and among transplanting terciles. RESULTS: A total of 85,505 donor heart offers were made to 133 centers with 15,264 (17.9%) accepted for OHT. High-acceptance programs (>20.2%) more frequently accepted donors with LVEF <60%, HIV, HCV, and/or HBV, ≥50 offers, or distance >500 miles from the transplanting center (each p < .001). Posttransplant survival was comparable across all three terciles (p = .11). One- and five-year survival were also similar across terciles when examining recipients of all five ECD factors. Acceptance tier and increasing acceptance rate were not found to have any impact on mortality in multivariable modeling. Of ECD factors, only age ≥40 years was found to have increased hazards for mortality (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.46; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Of recipients of ECD hearts, outcomes are similar across center-acceptance terciles. Educating less aggressive programs to increase donor acceptance and ECD utilization may yield higher national rates of OHT without major impact on outcomes.

Gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery: Incidence, predictors, and impact on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, predictors, and long-term impact of gastrointestinal (GI) complications following adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: Index Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adult cardiac operations performed between January 2010 and February 2018 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified by the occurrence of postoperative GI complications. Outcomes included early and late survival as well as other associated major postoperative complications. A subanalysis of propensity score-matched patients was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 10,285 patients were included, and the overall rate of GI complications was 2.4% (n = 246). Predictors of GI complications included dialysis dependency, intra-aortic balloon pump, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and longer aortic cross-clamp times. Thirty-day (2.6% vs. 24.8%), 1- (6.3% vs. 41.9%), and 3-year (11.1% vs. 48.4%) mortality were substantially higher in patients who experienced GI complications (all p < .001). GI complication was associated with a threefold increased hazard for mortality (hazard ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.6-3.7) after risk adjustment, and there was an association between the occurrence of GI complications and increased rates of renal failure (39.4% vs. 2.5%), new dialysis dependency (31.3% vs. 1.5%), multisystem organ failure (21.5% vs .1.0%), and deep sternal wound infections (2.6% vs. 0.2%; all p < .001). These results persisted in propensity-matched analysis. CONCLUSION: GI complications are infrequent but have a profound impact on early and late survival, and often occur in association with other major complications. Risk factor modification, heightened awareness, and early detection and management of GI complications appear warranted.

The predictive value of preimplant pulmonary function testing in LVAD patients.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of preoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients remains unknown. This study evaluates the relationship between abnormal PFTs and postimplant outcomes in LVAD patients. METHODS: LVAD implants from January 2004 to December 2018 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence of abnormal preoperative PFTs, and the primary outcome was respiratory adverse events (AE). Secondary outcomes included 1-year overall postimplant survival, and complications including bleeding, renal failure, thromboembolism, and device malfunction. RESULTS: The total of 333 patients underwent LVAD implant, 46.5% (n = 155) with normal PFTs and 53.5% (n = 178) with abnormal PFTs. Patients with abnormal PFTs were noted to have higher rates of respiratory AEs (25.9% vs. 15.1%, p = .049). In multivariable analysis, the impact of PFTs was most significant when forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced expiratory volume (FEV1/FVC) ratio was less than 0.5 (hazard ratio [HR] 16.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-156.78). The rates of other AEs including bleeding, renal failure, right heart failure, and device malfunction were similar. One-year overall postimplant survival was comparable between the groups (56.8% vs. 68.8%, p = .3183), though patients in the lowest strata of FEV1 (<60% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (<0.5) had elevated risk-adjusted hazards for mortality (HR 2.63, 95% CI, 1.51-4.60 and HR 18.92, 95% CI, 2.10-170.40, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abnormal preoperative PFTs is not prohibitory for LVAD implantation although it can be used for risk stratification for respiratory AEs and mortality, particularly in patients with severely reduced metrics. The importance of careful patient selection should be underscored in this higher risk patient subset.

Twenty-year survival following orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated 20-year survival after adult orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing Registry database was queried to study adult OHT recipients between 1987 and 1998 with over 20-year posttransplant follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were 20-year survival and cause of death after OHT, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify significant independent predictors of long-term survival, and long-term survival was compared among cohorts stratified by number of predictors using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: 20,658 patients undergoing OHT were included, with a median follow-up of 9.0 (IQR, 3.2-15.4) years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival were 50.2%, 30.1%, and 17.2%, respectively. Median survival was 10.1 (IQR, 3.9-16.9) years. Increasing recipient age (>65 years), increasing donor age (>40 years), increasing recipient body mass index (>30), black race, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and longer cold ischemic time (>4 h) were adversely associated with a 20-year survival. Of these 6 negative predictors, presence of 0 risk factors had the greatest 10-year (59.7%) and 20-year survival (26.2%), with decreasing survival with additional negative predictors. The most common cause of death in 20-year survivors was renal, liver, and/or multisystem organ failure whereas graft failure more greatly impacted earlier mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies six negative preoperative predictors of 20-year survival with 20-year survival rates exceeding 25% in the absence of these factors. These data highlight the potential for very long-term survival after OHT in patients with end-stage heart failure and may be useful for patient selection and prognostication.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to heart transplant: Trends following the allocation change.

BACKGROUND: This study compared outcomes of patients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) following the recent heart allocation policy change. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing Registry (UNOS) database was queried to examine OHT patients between 2010 and 2020 that were bridged with ECMO. Waitlist outcomes and 1-year posttransplant survival were compared between patients waitlisted and/or transplanted before and after the heart allocation policy change. Secondary outcomes included posttransplant stroke, renal failure, and 1-year rejection. RESULTS: A total of 285 waitlisted patients were included, 173 (60.7%) waitlisted under the old policy and 112 (39.3%) under the new policy. New policy patients were more likely to receive OHT (82.2% vs. 40.6%), and less likely to be removed from the waitlist due to death or clinical deterioration (15.0% vs. 41.3%; both p < .001). A total of 165 patients bridged from ECMO to OHT were analyzed, 72 (43.6%) transplanted during the old policy and 93 (56.3%) under the new. Median waitlist time was reduced under the new policy (4 days [interquartile range {IQR}: 2-6] vs. 47 days [IQR: 10-228]). Postoperative renal failure was higher in the new policy group (23% vs. 6%; p = .002), but rates of stroke and 1-year acute rejection were equivalent. One-year survival was lower the new policy but was not significant (79.8% vs. 90.3%; p = .3917). CONCLUSIONS: The UNOS heart allocation policy change has resulted in decreased waitlist times and higher likelihood of transplant in patients supported with ECMO. Posttransplant 1-year survival has remained comparable although absolute rates are lower.

Patent foramen ovale repair at the time of double lung transplantation: Necessary or not?

INTRODUCTION: Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a common and often incidental intraoperative finding during lung transplantation (LTx). We sought to characterize the potential outcomes related to the decision making of whether the PFO was repaired or left unrepaired. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated bilateral LTx recipients between 2005 and 2015 from our prospective database. Incidence of postoperative stoke, 90-day mortality, and overall survival was compared between the PFO-positive and PFO-negative groups, and secondly compared between repaired PFO (rPFO) and non-repaired PFO (nrPFO) groups. RESULTS: A total of 831 LTx recipients were analyzed: 185 PFO-positive (140 nrPFO, 45 rPFO) and 646 PFO-negative. Study groups were similar with regard to age and comorbidity. The presence of PFO was not associated with a difference in postoperative stroke (P = .89) or 90-day mortality (P = .64). In patients with PFO, intraoperative repair resulted in a lower, but non-significant rate of stroke (0% vs 5%; P = .20) and no difference in mortality (P = .26). As expected, PFO and PFO repair were both associated with a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary bypass utilization, but no difference in pump-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of PFO repair remains unclear. However, it is not associated with an increased incidence of stroke or postoperative mortality following LTx.

Donation after circulatory death improves probability of heart transplantation in waitlisted candidates and results in post-transplant outcomes similar to those achieved with brain-dead donors.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitate the impact of heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor utilization on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in the United States. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify all adult waitlisted and transplanted candidates between October 18, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Waitlisted candidates were stratified according to whether they had been approved for donation after brain death (DBD) offers only or also approved for DCD offers. The cumulative incidence of transplantation was compared between the 2 cohorts. In a post-transplant analysis, 1-year post-transplant survival was compared between unmatched and propensity-score-matched cohorts of DBD and DCD recipients. RESULTS: A total of 14,803 candidates were waitlisted, including 12,287 approved for DBD donors only and 2516 approved for DCD donors. Overall, DCD approval was associated with an increased sub-hazard ratio (HR) for transplantation and a lower sub-HR for delisting owing to death/deterioration after risk adjustment. In a subgroup analysis, candidates with blood type B and status 4 designation received the greatest benefit from DCD approval. A total of 12,238 recipients underwent transplantation, 11,636 with DBD hearts and 602 with DCD hearts. Median waitlist times were significantly shorter for status 3 and status 4 recipients receiving DCD hearts. One-year post-transplant survival was comparable between unmatched and propensity score-matched cohorts of DBD and DCD recipients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DCD hearts confers a higher probability of transplantation and a lower incidence of death/deterioration while on the waitlist, particularly among certain subpopulations such as status 4 candidates. Importantly, the use of DCD donors results in similar post-transplant survival as DBD donors.

Can we safely expand the donation after circulatory death donor heart pool by extending the donor age limit?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of donor age on outcomes following donation after circulatory death heart transplantation. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent isolated donation after circulatory heart transplantation from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. The cohort was stratified into 2 groups according to donor age, where advanced donor age was defined as 40 years or more. Outcomes were 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of recipient age on 90-day survival among the recipients with advanced-age donors. RESULTS: A total of 994 recipients were included in the study period, and 161 patients (17.1%) received allografts from advanced-age donors. During the study period, the annual incidence of donation after circulatory heart transplantation with advanced-age donors substantially increased. The recipients with advanced-age donors had similar 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survivals compared with the recipients with younger donors. The comparable 90-day survival persisted in a propensity score-matched comparison. In the subgroup analysis among the recipients with advanced-age donors, the recipients aged 60 years or more had significantly reduced 90-day survival compared with the recipients aged less than 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The use of appropriately selected donation after circulatory donors aged 40 years or more has similar survival compared with that of younger donors. With careful candidate risk stratification and selection, consideration of using donation after circulatory donors aged more than 40 years may further ameliorate ongoing organ shortage with comparable early post-transplant outcomes.

Improved waitlist and comparable post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 heart allocation system.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical trends and the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation in the United States. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to compare adult patients before and after the allocation policy change. This study included 2 separate analyses evaluating the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the 2018 allocation system's risk-adjusted hazards for 1-year waitlist and post-transplant mortality. RESULTS: The initial analysis investigating the waitlist outcomes included 1779 patients listed for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. Of these, 1075 patients (60.4%) were listed after the 2018 allocation policy change. After the policy change, the waitlist outcomes significantly improved with a shorter waitlist time, lower likelihood of de-listing, and higher likelihood of transplantation. In the subsequent analysis investigating the post-transplant outcomes, 1130 simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients were included, where 738 patients (65.3%) underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation after the policy change. The 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year post-transplant survival and complication rates were comparable before and after the policy change. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the 2018 allocation system positively impacted risk-adjusted 1-year waitlist mortality (sub-hazard ratio, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.51-0.85, P < .001), but it did not significantly impact risk-adjusted 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72-1.47, P = .876). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates increased rates of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation with a shorter waitlist time after the 2018 allocation policy change. Furthermore, there were improved waitlist outcomes and comparable early post-transplant survival after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 allocation system.