Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Rib fracture(s) is a common and painful injury often associated with significant morbidity (e.g., respiratory complications) and high mortality rates, especially in the elderly. Risk stratification and prompt implementation of analgesic pathways using a multimodal analgesia approach comprise a primary endpoint of care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures. This narrative review aims to describe the most recent evidence and care pathways currently available, including risk stratification tools and pharmacologic and regional analgesic blocks frequently used as part of the broadly recommended multimodal analgesic approach. SOURCE: Available literature was searched using PubMed and Embase databases for each topic addressed herein and reviewed by content experts. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four risk stratification tools were identified, with the Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma score as most predictive. Current evidence on pharmacologic (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) and regional analgesia (i.e., thoracic epidural analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block) techniques was reviewed, as was the pathophysiology of rib fracture(s) and its associated complications, including the development of chronic pain and disabilities. CONCLUSION: Rib fracture(s) continues to be a serious diagnosis, with high rates of mortality, development of chronic pain, and disability. A multidisciplinary approach to management, combined with appropriate analgesia and adherence to care bundles/protocols, has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Most of the risk-stratifying care pathways identified perform poorly in predicting mortality and complications after rib fracture(s).

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les fractures des côtes sont des blessures courantes et douloureuses souvent associées à une morbidité importante (p. ex., complications respiratoires) et à des taux de mortalité élevés, surtout chez les personnes âgées. La stratification des risques et la mise en œuvre rapide de voies analgésiques à l'aide d'une approche d'analgésie multimodale constituent un critère d'évaluation principal des soins visant à réduire la morbidité et la mortalité associées aux fractures des côtes. Ce compte rendu narratif a pour objectif de décrire les données probantes les plus récentes et les parcours de soins actuellement disponibles, y compris les outils de stratification des risques et les blocs analgésiques pharmacologiques et régionaux fréquemment utilisés dans le cadre de l'approche analgésique multimodale largement recommandée. SOURCES: La littérature disponible a été recherchée à l'aide des bases de données PubMed et Embase pour chaque sujet abordé dans le présent compte rendu et examinée par des expert·es en contenu. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Quatre outils de stratification des risques ont été identifiés, le score de l'Étude de la prise en charge des traumatismes contondants de la paroi thoracique (Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma) étant le plus prédictif. Les données probantes actuelles sur les techniques d'analgésie pharmacologiques (c.-à-d. acétaminophène, anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, gabapentinoïdes, kétamine, lidocaïne et dexmédétomidine) et d'analgésie régionale (c.-à-d. analgésie péridurale thoracique, bloc paravertébral thoracique, bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis et bloc du plan du muscle grand dentelé) ont été examinées, de même que la physiopathologie de la ou des fractures des côtes et de leurs complications associées, y compris l'apparition de douleurs chroniques et d'incapacités. CONCLUSION: Les fractures des côtes continuent d'être un diagnostic grave, avec des taux élevés de mortalité, de développement de douleurs chroniques et d'invalidité. Il a été démontré qu'une approche multidisciplinaire de la prise en charge, combinée à une analgésie appropriée et à l'adhésion aux ensembles et protocoles de soins, réduit la morbidité et la mortalité. La plupart des parcours de soins de stratification des risques identifiés sont peu performants pour prédire la mortalité et les complications après une ou plusieurs fractures de côtes.

Competencies for proficiency in basic point-of-care ultrasound in anesthesiology: national expert recommendations using Delphi methodology.

PURPOSE: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows for rapid bedside assessment and guidance of patient care. Recently, POCUS was included as a mandatory component of Canadian anesthesiology training; however, there is no national consensus regarding the competencies to guide curriculum development. We therefore aimed to define national residency competencies for basic perioperative POCUS proficiency. METHODS: We adopted a Delphi process to delineate relevant POCUS competencies whereby we circulated an online survey to academic anesthesiologists identified as POCUS leads/experts (n = 25) at all 17 Canadian anesthesiology residency programs. After reviewing a list of competencies derived from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's National Curriculum, we asked participants to accept, refine, delete, or add competencies. Three rounds were completed between 2022 and 2023. We discarded items with < 50% agreement, revised those with 50-79% agreement based upon feedback provided, and maintained unrevised those items with ≥ 80% agreement. RESULTS: We initially identified and circulated (Round 1) 74 competencies across 19 clinical domains (e.g., basics of ultrasound [equipment, nomenclature, clinical governance, physics]; cardiac [left ventricle, right ventricle, valve assessment, pericardial effusion, intravascular volume status] and lung ultrasound anatomy, image acquisition, and image interpretation; and clinical applications [monitoring and serial assessments, persistent hypotension, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest]). After three Delphi rounds (and 100% response rate maintained), panellists ultimately agreed upon 75 competencies. CONCLUSION: Through national expert consensus, this study identified POCUS competencies suitable for curriculum development and assessment in perioperative anesthesiology. Next steps include designing and piloting a POCUS curriculum and assessment tool(s) based upon these nationally defined competencies.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'échographie ciblée (POCUS) permet une évaluation rapide au chevet des patient·es et l'orientation des soins aux patient·es. Récemment, l'échographie ciblée a été incluse en tant que composante obligatoire de la formation en anesthésiologie au Canada; cependant, il n'y a pas de consensus national sur les compétences qui guideront l'élaboration des programmes d'études. Nous avons donc cherché à définir les compétences à inclure dans les programmes de résidence nationaux pour acquérir des compétences de base en échographie ciblée périopératoire. MéTHODE: Nous avons adopté un processus Delphi pour délimiter les compétences pertinentes en échographie ciblée, processus dans le cadre duquel nous avons fait circuler un sondage en ligne auprès d'anesthésiologistes universitaires identifié·es comme des responsables/expert·es en échographie ciblée (n = 25) dans les 17 programmes canadiens de résidence en anesthésiologie. Après avoir examiné une liste de compétences tirées du programme d'études national du Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada, nous avons demandé aux participant·es d'accepter, de peaufiner, de supprimer ou d'ajouter des compétences. Trois rondes ont été complétées entre 2022 et 2023. Nous avons écarté les éléments ayant < 50 % d'accord, révisé ceux avec 50 à 79 % d'accord en fonction des commentaires fournis, et maintenu sans révision les éléments obtenant ≥ 80 % d'accord. RéSULTATS: Nous avons d'abord identifié et diffusé (ronde 1) 74 compétences dans 19 domaines cliniques (p. ex., les bases de l'échographie [équipement, nomenclature, gouvernance clinique, physique]; anatomie échographique cardiaque [ventricule gauche, ventricule droit, évaluation valvulaire, épanchement péricardique, état du volume intravasculaire] et pulmonaire [acquisition et interprétation d'images]; et applications cliniques [surveillance et évaluations en série, hypotension persistante, détresse respiratoire, arrêt cardiaque]). Après trois rondes Delphi (et un taux de réponse de 100 % maintenu), les panélistes se sont finalement mis·es d'accord sur 75 compétences. CONCLUSION: Grâce à un consensus d'expert·es au pays, cette étude a permis d'identifier les compétences en échographie ciblée adaptées à l'élaboration et à l'évaluation de programmes d'études en anesthésiologie périopératoire. Les prochaines étapes comprennent la conception et la mise à l'essai d'un programme d'études et d'outils d'évaluation en échographie ciblée basés sur ces compétences définies à l'échelle nationale.

Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE: Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting. METHODS: In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events. CONCLUSION: Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les erreurs médicales peuvent parfois s'expliquer par la cécité d'inattention, soit le fait de ne pas remarquer un événement/objet qui est à la vue de tous et toutes. Notre objectif était de déterminer si l'âge/l'expérience, le repos/la fatigue et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation pouvaient affecter la cécité d'inattention dans le cadre de l'anesthésie/chirurgie. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude multicentrique/multinationale, un échantillon de convenance de 280 anesthésiologistes ont visionné une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur un patient de trauma simulé bénéficiant d'une laparotomie et ont enregistré (de manière indépendante/anonyme) les anomalies qu'ils et elles ont remarquées. La vidéo contenait quatre anomalies attendues/courantes (hypotension, tachycardie, hypoxie, hypothermie) et deux événements inattendus/rares bien en vue (mouvement de la tête du patient, fuite du cathéter veineux central). Nous avons analysé la capacité des participant·es à remarquer les événements attendus/inattendus (critère d'évaluation principal) et la proportion d'événements attendus/inattendus selon le groupe d'âge et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation (critères d'évaluation secondaires). RéSULTATS: Les anesthésiologistes de tous âges ont remarqué moins d'événements inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants. Globalement, les anesthésiologistes plus jeunes ont manqué moins d'événements courants que leurs congénères plus âgé·es (P = 0,02). Il n'y avait pas d'association constante entre l'âge et la perception d'événements inattendus ou rares (P = 0,28), bien que la cohorte la plus jeune (< 30 ans) ait surpassé les autres groupes d'âge. La formation antérieure par simulation n'a pas eu d'incidence sur la proportion d'inobservation des événements inattendus ou rares, mais a été associée à moins de cécité d'inattention envers les événements attendus ou courants. Le repos perçu n'a pas eu d'impact sur la perception des événements. CONCLUSION: Les anesthésiologistes ont remarqué moins d'événements cliniques inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants dans une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur la simulation d'un patient traumatisé, ce qui s'inscrit dans la cécité d'inattention. La formation préalable par simulation était associée à une meilleure capacité à remarquer les événements anticipés/attendus, mais ne réduisait pas la cécité d'inattention. Nos résultats peuvent avoir des implications pour la compréhension des accidents médicaux et les efforts visant à améliorer la conscience situationnelle, en particulier dans les contextes de soins périopératoires aigus et de soins intensifs.

Perioperative management of patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the mechanism of action, clinical outcomes, and perioperative implications of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs). Specifically, this review focuses on the available literature surrounding complications (primarily, bronchoaspiration) and current recommendations, as well as knowledge gaps and future research directions on the perioperative management of GLP-1-RAs. RECENT FINDINGS: GLP-1-RAs are known to delay gastric emptying. Accordingly, recent case reports and retrospective observational studies, while anecdotal, suggest that the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs may increase the risk of bronchoaspiration despite fasting intervals that comply with (and often exceed) current guidelines. As a result, guidelines and safety bulletins have been published by several Anesthesiology Societies. SUMMARY: While rapidly emerging evidence suggests that perioperative GLP-1-RAs use is associated with delayed gastric emptying and increased risk of bronchoaspiration (particularly in patients undergoing general anesthesia and/or deep sedation), high-quality studies are needed to provide definitive answers with respect to the safety and duration of preoperative drug cessation, and optimal fasting intervals according to the specific GLP-1-RA agent, the dose/duration of administration, and patient-specific factors. Meanwhile, clinicians must be aware of the potential risks associated with the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs and follow the recommendations put forth by their respective Anesthesiology Societies.

Introducing the fragility index-A case study using the Term Breech Trial.

The fragility index (FI) is a sensitivity analysis of the statistically significant result of a clinical study. It is the number of hypothetical changes in the primary event of one of the two cohorts in a 1-to-1 comparative trial to render the statistically significant result non-significant (ie, to alter the P-value from ≤0.05 to >0.05). The FI can be compared with the patient drop-out rates and protocol violations, which, if much higher than the FI, may arguably suggest less robustness/stability of the trial's results. To illustrate the concept, we have chosen the Term Breech Trial (TBT) as a case study. The TBT results favor planned cesarean birth, as opposed to planned vaginal delivery, in the term singleton fetus with breech presentation. Our analysis shows that the FI of the TBT is 21, which is small in comparison to the number (hundreds) of protocol violations present. Some experts have suggested the inclusion of the FI in data analysis and subsequent discussion of clinical trial data. Routine use of such a metric may be valuable in encouraging readers to maintain a healthy degree of skepticism, especially when interpreting trial results which may directly influence clinical practice.

Systemic Heparinization After Neuraxial Anesthesia in Vascular Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's guidelines recommend a 1-hour interval after neuraxial anesthesia (NA) before systemic heparinization to mitigate the risk of spinal hematoma (SH). The study authors aimed to characterize the time interval between NA and systemic heparinization in vascular surgery patients (primary outcome). The secondary outcomes included the historic incidence of SH, and risk estimation of the SH formation based on available data. Heparin dose, length of surgery, difficulty and/or the number of NA attempts, and patient demographics were recorded. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis between April 2012 and April 2022. SETTING: A single (academic) center. PARTICIPANTS: Vascular surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous heparin administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All (N = 311) vascular patients were reviewed, of whom 127 (5 femoral-femoral bypass, 67 femoral-popliteal bypass, and 55 endovascular aneurysm repairs [EVAR]) received NA and were included in the final analysis. Patients receiving general anesthesia alone (N = 184) were excluded. Neuraxial anesthesia included spinal (N = 119), epidural (N = 4), or combined spinal-epidural (N = 4) blocks. The average time between NA and heparin administration was 42.8 ± 22.1 minutes, with 83.7% of patients receiving heparin within 1 hour of NA. The time between NA and heparin administration was 40.4 ± 22.3, 50.1 ± 23.4, and 31.3 ± 12.5 minutes for femoral-femoral bypass, femoral-popliteal bypass, and EVAR, respectively. Heparin was administered after 1 hour of NA in 20% of femoral-femoral bypass, 27% of femoral-popliteal bypass, and 3.9% of EVAR patients. No SHs were reported during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of vascular surgery patients at the authors' center received heparin within 1 hour of NA. Further studies are required to assess if their findings are consistent in other vascular surgery settings and/or centers.

Retrospective Review of Time to Uterotonic Administration and Maternal Outcomes After Postpartum Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in health care and ample resources, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) rates are increasing in high income countries. Although guidelines recommend therapeutic uterotonics, timing of administration is open to judgement and most often based on (inherently inaccurate) visual estimates of blood loss. With severe hemorrhage, every minute of delay can have significant consequences. Our objective was to examine the timing of uterotonic administration and its impact upon maternal outcomes. We hypothesized that increased time to uterotonic administration following the identification of PPH would be associated with a greater decline in hemoglobin (Hb) and higher odds of hypotension and transfusion. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of PPH that occurred at an academic centre between June 2015 and September 2017. All cases of primary PPH (i.e., those declared within 24 h of delivery with estimated blood loss [EBL] >500 mL for vaginal and >1000 mL for cesarean deliveries) were analyzed. Patient records were excluded if they were missing information regarding time of PPH declaration, uterotonic administration, and/or Hb measures, or if a pre-existing medical condition could have contributed to PPH. RESULTS: Of 4397 births, there were 259 (5.9%) cases of primary PPH, of which 128 were included in this analysis. For these patients, each 5-minute delay in uterotonic treatment was associated with 26% higher odds of hypotension following delivery of any type. For vaginal deliveries (n = 86), each 5-minute delay was associated with 31% and 34% higher odds of hypotension and transfusion, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, delay in administration of therapeutic uterotonics was associated with a higher incidence of hypotension and transfusion in primary PPH patients.

Update on surgical repair in functional mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is common in patients with myocardial infarction or dilated cardiomyopathy, and portends a poor prognosis despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Surgical or transcatheter mitral repair for FMR from recent randomized clinical trials showed disappointing or conflicting results. AIMS: To provide an update on the role of surgical repair in the management of FMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search terms included secondary/FMR, ischemic mitral regurgitation, mitral repair, mitral replacement, mitral annuloplasty, transcatheter mitral repair, and percutaneous mitral repair. Randomized clinical trials over the past decade were the particular focus of the current review. RESULTS: Recent data underlined the complexity and poor prognosis of FMR. GDMT and cardiac resynchronization, when indicated, should always be applied. Accurate assessment of the interplay between ventricular geometry and mitral valve function is essential to differentiate proportionate FMR from the disproportionate subgroup, which could be helpful in selecting appropriate transcatheter intervention strategies. Surgical repair, most commonly performed with an undersized ring annuloplasty, remains controversial. Adjunctive valvular or subvalvular repair techniques are evolving and may produce improved results in selected FMR patients. CONCLUSION: FMR resulted from complex valve-ventricular interaction and remodeling. Distinguishing proportionate FMR from disproportionate FMR is important in exploring their underlying mechanisms and to guide medical treatment with surgical or transcatheter interventions. Further studies are warranted to confirm the clinical benefit of appropriate surgical repair in selected FMR patients.

A simple technique to assess postoperative epidural functionality.

To describe an alternative method of measuring the Epidural Waveform Analysis (EWA), a technique through which anesthesiologists can confirm the position of a needle and/or catheter tip in the epidural space. EWA consists of epidural catheter transduction with a pressure system typically used for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring which generates a characteristic oscillatory waveform (provided the catheter tip is within the epidural space) in synchrony with the pulsatile epidural circulation. The technique requires a double-male connector, a 3-way stopcock and an arterial pressure extension tubing along with the patient's existing arterial line setup while ensuring a meticulously sterile technique to mitigate the risks of neuraxial infection. The technique described herein has been successfully and routinely applied within our institution to measure EWA with the advantage of being potentially less wasteful. EWA allows anesthesiologists to confirm the correct position of an epidural needle/catheter. We describe a method of successfully measuring EWA while reducing wastefulness.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

As part of immune surveillance, killer T lymphocytes search for cancer cells and destroy them. Some cancer cells, however, develop escape mechanisms to evade detection and destruction. One of these mechanisms is the expression of cell surface proteins which allow the cancer cell to bind to proteins on T cells called checkpoints to switch off and effectively evade T-cell-mediated destruction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that block the binding of cancer cell proteins to T-cell checkpoints, preventing the T-cell response from being turned off by cancer cells and enabling killer T cells to attack. In other words, ICIs restore innate antitumor immunity, as opposed to traditional chemotherapies that directly kill cancer cells. Given their relatively excellent risk-benefit ratio when compared to other forms of cancer treatment modalities, ICIs are now becoming ubiquitous and have revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancer. Indeed, the prognosis of some patients is so much improved that the threshold for admission for intensive care should be adjusted accordingly. Nevertheless, by modulating immune checkpoint activity, ICIs can disrupt the intricate homeostasis between inhibition and stimulation of immune response, leading to decreased immune self-tolerance and, ultimately, autoimmune complications. These immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) may virtually affect all body systems. Multiple IRAEs are common and may range from mild to life-threatening. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach and consists mainly of immunosuppression, cessation or postponement of ICI treatment, and supportive therapy, which may require surgical intervention and/or intensive care. We herein review the current literature surrounding IRAEs of interest to anesthesiologists and intensivists. With proper care, fatality (0.3%-1.3%) is rare.

Adductor canal block with or without added magnesium sulfate following total knee arthroplasty: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often includes intrathecal opioids, periarticular injection (PAI) of local anesthetic, systemic multimodal analgesia, and/or peripheral nerve blockade. The adductor canal block (ACB) provides analgesia without muscle weakness and magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) may extend its duration. The purpose of this trial was to compare the duration and quality of early post-TKA analgesia in patients receiving postoperative ACB (± MgSO4) in addition to standard care. METHODS: Elective TKA patients were randomized to: 1) sham ACB, 2) ropivacaine ACB, or 3) ropivacaine ACB with added MgSO4. All received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, intraoperative PAI, and multimodal systemic analgesia. Patients and assessors remained blinded to allocation. Anesthesiologists knew whether patients had received sham or ACB but were blinded to MgSO4. The primary outcome was time to first analgesic (via patient-controlled analgesia [PCA] with iv morphine) following ACB. Secondary outcomes were morphine consumption, side effects, visual analogue scale pain scores, satisfaction until 24 hr postoperatively, and length of stay. RESULTS: Of 130 patients, 121 were included. Nine were excluded post randomization: four were protocol violations, three did not meet inclusion criteria, and two had severe pain requiring open label blockade. There were no differences in the median [interquartile range] time to first PCA request: sham, 310 min [165-550]; ropivacaine ACB, 298 min [120-776]; and ropivacaine ACB with MgSO4, 270 min [113-780] (P = 0.96). Similarly, we detected no differences in resting pain, opioid consumption, length of stay, or associated side effects until 24 hr postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We found no analgesic benefit of a postoperative ACB, with or without added MgSO4, in TKA patients undergoing spinal anesthesia and receiving intrathecal morphine, an intraoperative PAI, and multimodal systemic analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02581683); registered 21 October 2015.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'analgésie postopératoire suivant une arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG) inclut souvent des opioïdes intrathécaux, une injection périarticulaire (IPA) d'anesthésique local, une analgésie multimodale systémique, et/ou des blocs des nerfs périphériques. Le bloc du canal des adducteurs (BCA) permet une analgésie sans faiblesse musculaire et le sulfate de magnésium (MgSO4) pourrait prolonger sa durée. L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer la durée et la qualité de l'analgésie post-ATG précoce chez les patients recevant un BCA postopératoire (± MgSO4) en plus des soins standard. MéTHODE: Des patients devant subir une ATG non urgente ont été randomisés à recevoir : 1) un BCA placebo (groupe témoin), 2) un BCA avec ropivacaïne, ou 3) un BCA avec ropivacaïne et MgSO4. Tous ont reçu une rachianesthésie avec morphine intrathécale, une IPA peropératoire, et une analgésie multimodale systémique. L'allocation a été faite à l'insu des patients et des évaluateurs. Les anesthésiologistes savaient si les patients avaient reçu un placebo ou un BCA, mais n'étaient pas informés de l'ajout ou non de MgSO4. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le temps jusqu'à la première prise d'analgésique (via une analgésie contrôlée par le patient [ACP] avec de la morphine iv) après le BCA. Les critères secondaires comprenaient la consommation de morphine, les effets secondaires, les scores de douleur sur l'échelle visuelle analogue, la satisfaction jusqu'à 24 heures postopératoires, et la durée de séjour. RéSULTATS: Sur 130 patients, 121 ont été inclus. Neuf ont été exclus après la randomisation : quatre l'ont été en raison de violations du protocole, trois ne répondaient pas aux critères d'inclusion, et deux ont ressenti des douleurs graves nécessitant un bloc sans insu. Aucune différence n'a été observée dans le temps médian [écart interquartile] jusqu'à la première demande d'ACP : placebo, 310 min [165-550]; BCA ropivacaïne, 298 min [120-776]; et BCA ropivacaïne avec MgSO4, 270 min [113-780] (P = 0,96). De la même manière, nous n'avons détecté aucune différence dans la douleur au repos, la consommation d'opioïdes, la durée de séjour, ou les effets secondaires associés jusqu'à 24 heures postopératoires. CONCLUSION: Nous n'avons trouvé aucun avantage analgésique à un BCA postopératoire, avec ou sans ajout de MgSO4, chez les patients subissant une ATG sous rachianesthésie et recevant de la morphine intrathécale, une IPA peropératoire, et une analgésie multimodale systémique. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02581683); enregistrée le 21 octobre 2015.

Efficacy and Safety of Magnesium for the Management of Chronic Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and complex health problem that is associated with a heavy symptom burden, substantial economic and social impact, and also, very few highly effective treatments. This review examines evidence for the efficacy and safety of magnesium in chronic pain. The previously published protocol for this review was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched until September 2018. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing magnesium (at any dose, frequency, or route of administration) with placebo using participant-reported pain measures. A total of 9 RCTs containing 418 participants were included. Three studies examined neuropathic pain (62 participants), 3 examined migraines (190 participants), 2 examined complex regional pain syndrome (86 participants), and 1 examined low back pain with a neuropathic component (80 participants). Heterogeneity of included studies precluded any meta-analyses. No judgment could be made about safety because adverse events were inconsistently reported in the included studies. Evidence of analgesic efficacy from included studies was equivocal. However, reported efficacy signals in some of the included trials provide a rationale for more definitive studies. Future, larger-sized trials with good assay sensitivity and better safety assessment and reporting, as well as careful attention to formulations with optimal bioavailability, will serve to better define the role of magnesium in the management of chronic pain.

Bias in Before-After Studies: Narrative Overview for Anesthesiologists.

Before-after study designs are effective research tools and in some cases, have changed practice. These designs, however, are inherently susceptible to bias (ie, systematic errors) that are sometimes subtle but can invalidate their conclusions. This overview provides examples of before-after studies relevant to anesthesiologists to illustrate potential sources of bias, including selection/assignment, history, regression to the mean, test-retest, maturation, observer, retrospective, Hawthorne, instrumentation, attrition, and reporting/publication bias. Mitigating strategies include using a control group, blinding, matching before and after cohorts, minimizing the time lag between cohorts, using prospective data collection with consistent measuring/reporting criteria, time series data collection, and/or alternative study designs, when possible. Improved reporting with enforcement of the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) checklists will serve to increase transparency and aid in interpretation. By highlighting the potential types of bias and strategies to improve transparency and mitigate flaws, this overview aims to better equip anesthesiologists in designing and/or critically appraising before-after studies.