Real-life effectiveness of once-daily calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate gel vs. ointment formulations in psoriasis vulgaris: final analysis of the 52-week PRO-long study.

BACKGROUND: Topical therapies are the mainstay of treatment for psoriasis vulgaris. The fixed combination of calcipotriol (Cal) 50 µg/g plus betamethasone 0.5 mg/g (as dipropionate; BD) is a first-line topical treatment and available as a gel or ointment. The use of these fixed combination products was compared in PRO-long, a long-term noninterventional study, for which interim results (4 and 12 weeks) have previously been reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients' perspectives on the fixed combination gel and ointment formulations; to include efficacy, adherence behaviour, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) aspects during long-term real-life psoriasis management. METHODS: PRO-long was a multicentre, prospective, observational, 52-week study of patients prescribed fixed combination Cal/BD gel or ointment in clinical practice. For final analysis the following were assessed at weeks 24, 36 and 52: differences in the proportion of patients with 'mild'/'very mild' disease according to patient's global assessment of disease severity, adherence behaviour, treatment satisfaction (nine-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication) and HRQoL (Skindex-29). RESULTS: Patients (n = 328) were prescribed once-daily Cal/BD gel (n = 152) or ointment (n = 176). At week 52, a higher proportion of patients reported that the severity of their psoriasis was 'mild'/'very mild' vs. baseline (gel: 60.2 vs. 47.1%; ointment: 58.8 vs. 42.4%), with greater treatment satisfaction reported in patients using gel vs. those using ointment. A higher proportion of patients found the gel 'easy' to use compared with the ointment (66.7 vs. 45.2%). Daily application of treatment took ≤ 5 min for 86.1% of patients using gel and 71.0% of patients using ointment. CONCLUSION: This real-life study has demonstrated similar effectiveness between the Cal/BD formulations. However, over a 52-week treatment period, patients reported greater treatment satisfaction with the gel, which was considered easier to use, faster to apply and overall a more convenient product.

Real-life effectiveness of once-daily calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate gel vs. ointment formulations in psoriasis vulgaris: 4- and 12-week interim results from the PRO-long study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is most often treated using topical therapies such as the once-daily fixed combination of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate, which is available as a gel and an ointment. To date, there have been no direct comparisons of patient perspectives on the two formulations. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients' perspectives on calcipotriol and betamethasone gel and ointment formulations, including real-life effectiveness, adherence behaviour, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL), during long-term psoriasis vulgaris management, according to interim findings from the PRO-long study. METHODS: PRO-long is a multicentre, prospective, observational, 52-week cohort study in patients prescribed fixed-combination calcipotriol (50 µg/g) and betamethasone (0.5 mg/g; as dipropionate) gel or ointment for long-term psoriasis management. Difference in effectiveness at 4 and 12 weeks was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients with controlled (mild or very mild) disease, according to the Patient's Global Assessment. Additional patient questionnaires were used to assess adherence behaviour, treatment satisfaction (nine-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) and health-related QoL (Skindex-29). RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in the analysis. In single items of the adherence behaviour and treatment satisfaction questionnaires, patients preferred the gel over the ointment as convenient, easy to use and fast to apply. Post hoc analysis demonstrated significant differences between gel and ointment for convenience and application time. More patients had controlled disease at week 12 with gel (71.9%) vs. ointment (65.7%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (primary end point; P = 0.40). CONCLUSION: This interim analysis supports fixed-combination calcipotriol and betamethasone gel as more convenient, easier to use and faster to apply than the ointment formulation in real-life conditions according to patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Furthermore, a numerical difference in patient-reported real-life effectiveness was seen in favour of the gel, although this was not statistically significant.

A comparison of twice-daily calcipotriol ointment with once-daily short-contact dithranol cream therapy: quality-of-life outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of supervised treatment of psoriasis in a day-care setting.

BACKGROUND: Calcipotriol ointment and short-contact dithranol cream therapy are well-established topical treatments for psoriasis. Quality of life, i.e. the physical, psychological, and social functioning and well-being of the patient, has become an essential outcome measure in chronic skin disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality-of-life outcomes of calcipotriol ointment with that of short-contact dithranol cream in a supervised treatment regimen, and to determine the degree of improvement in quality of life these topical treatments can accomplish. METHODS: In a multicentre randomized controlled trial in six centres in the Netherlands, 106 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included, 54 receiving calcipotriol ointment twice daily and 52 dithranol cream once daily in a 12-week intensive treatment programme. Patients were treated at the day-care centre, using the care instruction principle of daily visits during the first week and twice-weekly visits subsequently for up to 12 weeks. Quality of life was assessed with the Skindex-29 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: At the end of treatment, no statistically significant differences were found between the calcipotriol and the dithranol group in any of the quality-of-life domains or scales of the Skindex-29 and the SF-36. Over time, a significant improvement of quality of life was found on all three scales of the dermatology-specific Skindex-29, predominantly of a moderate magnitude. In the calcipotriol group, a significant change of a small magnitude was found in the Physical Component Summary of the SF-36. No significant changes were found in the Mental Component Summary (or on any of the eight scales composing the questionnaire) of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis was confirmed, that no statistically significant differences in improvement of quality of life could be found between calcipotriol ointment and dithranol short-contact cream in a day-care setting. Given this result, both calcipotriol and dithranol can be welcome alternatives for the patient. Calcipotriol, being more practical and patient friendly, can be considered as a first-line approach in clinical practice. However, in patients recalcitrant to calcipotriol and/or other topical treatments, preference should be given to the dithranol regimen. Topical treatment in combination with interventions explicitly focusing on improvement of coping behaviour and psychosocial functioning may further increase the degree of improvement in the psychosocial domains of quality of life. The results of this study are likely to give further evidence to the notion that the generic SF-36 is little or not responsive to small to moderate changes in quality of life in mild to moderate psoriasis.

A comparison of twice-daily calcipotriol ointment with once-daily short-contact dithranol cream therapy: a randomized controlled trial of supervised treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in a day-care setting.

BACKGROUND: Calcipotriol has become a first-line treatment for psoriasis. Its efficacy and safety have been shown in many comparative clinical trials carried out in outpatients. In a comparative study in patients visiting the outpatient department once every 14 days, it was shown that calcipotriol was more effective and better tolerated compared with dithranol. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of calcipotriol ointment with that of dithranol cream in a supervised treatment regimen. METHODS: In a multicentre randomized controlled trial in six centres in the Netherlands, 106 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were included, 54 receiving calcipotriol ointment twice daily and 52 dithranol cream once daily. Patients were treated at the day-care centre, using the care instruction principle of daily visits during the first week and twice-weekly visits subsequently for up to 12 weeks. RESULTS: This study failed to prove that calcipotriol is as efficacious as dithranol when used in a day-care setting (noninferiority test). The mean percentage reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from baseline to end of treatment was 57.0% in the calcipotriol group vs. 63.6% in the dithranol group. However, the two-sided test for superiority indicated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.39). At the end of treatment, 15% of the patients treated with calcipotriol ointment and 25% of those treated with dithranol cream did not require any further treatment. Although calcipotriol ointment appeared to be more effective during the first 8 weeks, a difference was no longer apparent at 12 weeks. In comparison with the high number of drop-outs due to cutaneous side-effects in the calcipotriol group, the frequency of a tolerable degree of irritation appeared to be higher in patients treated with dithranol. However, concomitant corticosteroid treatment of dithranol irritation in seven patients may have contributed to this difference between both treatments. Moreover, patients receiving therapy with calcipotriol ointment experienced fewer application-related skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders than patients treated with dithranol cream: 21 of 53 (40%) and 37 of 52 (71%), respectively. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that calcipotriol ointment might be at least as effective as dithranol cream in the day-care setting could not be proven in the present study. Whereas calcipotriol has become a mainstay in the routine outpatient treatment of psoriasis not requiring a day-care setting, dithranol treatment, being difficult as a routine outpatient therapy, has increased efficacy and improved tolerability if the treatment is carried out in a day-care setting.