A qualitative examination of patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) may feel overwhelmed at the prospect of having to consider treatment options particularly if they recently completed treatment for their primary disease or when they have no options that may lead to long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to examine patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent HNC. METHODS: Individuals with newly diagnosed recurrent HNC were recruited at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center. Participants were interviewed using a structured interview guide. Descriptive statistics were used to describe participants, and qualitative template analysis was used to analyze interview data. RESULTS: Participants (n = 38) considered information from healthcare providers, likelihood of treatment success, and other patient-specific factors in making their treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with recurrent HNC endorse a myriad of decision-making factors, the recommendation of their healthcare provider and the likelihood of treatment success are of paramount importance. Future research should focus on methods to rapidly identify patient priorities at the time of diagnosed recurrence while respecting patient coping and communication styles.

Priorities and Preferences of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer for Discussing and Receiving Information About Sexuality and Perception of Self-Report Measures.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer and its treatment can cause impairment in survivors' sexuality. Previous studies show a need for education and psychological support. AIM: To examine patients' priorities and preferences for discussing and receiving information about sexuality and to examine patient perceptions of existing self-report measures used in research. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional, Web-based study recruited adults with a current or previous diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Participants answered questions about their priority and preference for receiving information about sexuality and reviewed 4 self-report measures commonly used in the research of this population. RESULTS: More than 80% (n = 61) of participants reported that it was important to receive information about sexual issues. Participants chose "at the time of diagnosis" as the most frequent answer for preferred time to receive this information. Half of the participants (n = 35) indicated that they prefer discussing sexual issues with a health-care provider. The most frequent answer for the method of receiving information was through discussions. Participants endorsed 4 themes not addressed by self-report surveys: (i) elicitation of important information, (ii) symptom burden issues, (iii) psychological issues, and (iv) physical barriers. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Providers, regardless of specialty, must attempt or facilitate discussions around these issues at various times within the treatment and recovery phases. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Although limited by sample representation and cross-sectional design, this study addresses an important patient-centered issue that is a critical aspect of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer to discuss sexual issues in person with their health-care providers at the time of diagnosis. Participants reacted positively to the self-report measures, but they felt that important issues faced by patients with head and neck cancer were not fully addressed. Rhoten BA, Davis AJ, Baraff BN, et al. Priorities and Preferences of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer for Discussing and Receiving Information About Sexuality and Perception of Self-Report Measures. J Sex Med 2020;17:1529-1537.