Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Cardiac Recovery in Nonischemic Heart Failure: Keeping Weaning from the Device in Mind.

A minority of patients on left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) display myocardial recovery raising the question of device explantation. We report a series of seven LVAD patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy allowing explantation of the VAD. In case of four patients we overview follow-up periods of 4 to 10 years. Remarkably, in three cases device explantation was considered beyond 1 year of LVAD support. Explantation was finally performed after 20 months and more on the device. In light of the scarcity of donor organs we conclude that patients on LVAD support should be evaluated for possible weaning from the device on a regular basis.

Can Perioperative Right Ventricular Support Prevent Postoperative Right Heart Failure in Patients With Biventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?

OBJECTIVES: Depending on the pre-existing condition of the right ventricle (RV), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may have a detrimental effect on RV function, subsequently leading to right heart failure. This study details the authors' experience with perioperative mechanical RV support in patients with biventricular impairment but primarily scheduled for isolated LVAD implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Two center study, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This study included LVAD recipients with preoperative biventricular impairment who received an additional right ventricular assist device (RVAD) after a failed weaning attempt from cardiopulmonary bypass due to acute RV failure. INTERVENTIONS: Outcomes of 25 patients who underwent LVAD and unplanned temporary RVAD implantation were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients experienced significant preoperative RV impairment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: 10.2±26.3 mm; right atrium pressure: 17.9±10.4 mmHg) and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure: 54.8±25.7 mmHg). In 15 patients, additional tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed. Mean duration of temporary RVAD support was 11.1±7.2 days. In 23 patients (92%), the RVAD was removed successfully. None of the patients developed RV failure after RVAD removal. Hospital survival and the 1-year survival rate of the study group were 68% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of perioperative RVAD support in LVAD recipients with biventricular dysfunction are encouraging. Temporary RVAD support allows an already compromised RV to become attuned to the hemodynamic conditions after LVAD implantation. This strategy provides patients with preoperative impaired RV function a high likelihood to permanently undergo LVAD support only.