RESUMO
PURPOSE: There is a need to gain a deeper understanding of facilitators and barriers involving lifestyle behaviors among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Design: Research team explored influences (e.g., social, cultural, environmental) for healthy lifestyle behaviors (nutrition, physical activity (PA), and self-care). METHOD: One researcher conducted semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. Demographic data were collected via survey, and descriptive statistics were generated. SETTING: Patients were recruited, and interviews conducted via Zoom or phone. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight newly diagnosed, treatment naïve breast cancer patients were interviewed, a majority were non-Hispanic White women (n=23; 82%) with invasive (n=14; 50%) breast cancer. RESULTS: Themes related to nutrition, PA, and self-care emerged, including influences (e.g., environmental, cultural, social), barriers, facilitators, and lived experiences. Most patients stressed the importance of maintaining healthy eating habits (n=23), and some were interested in understanding the relationship between nutrition and cancer (n=7). Sixteen reported sustaining their PA levels, while others (n=11) explained barriers, such as time, distance, and pain. All patients reported utilizing self-care strategies, and most reported increased engagement in self-care since being diagnosed (n=14). CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on factors influencing and hindering the adoption of healthy eating, PA, and self-care strategies among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. The findings reflect the importance of healthy lifestyle behaviors as critical areas for upstream intervention.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Axillary node status is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. The primary aim was to evaluate tumor size and other characteristics relative to axillary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single institution retrospective chart review of stage I-III breast cancer patients collected demographic and clinical/pathologic data from 1998-2019. Student's t-test, Chi-squared test (or Fisher exact test if applicable), and logistic regression models were used for testing the association of pN+ to predictive variables. RESULTS: Of 728 patients (mean age 59 yrs) with mean follow up of 50 months, 86% were estrogen receptor +, 10% Her2+, 78% ER+HER2-negative, and 10% triple-negative. In total, 351/728 (48.2%) were pN+ and mean tumor size was larger in pN+ cases compared to pN- cases (mean = 27.7 mm versus 15.5 mm) (p < 0.001). By univariate analysis, pN+ was associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), higher grade, Her2, and histology (p < 0.005). Tumor-to-nipple distance was shorter in pN+ compared to pN- (45 mm v. 62 mm; p< 0.001). Age < 60, LVI, recurrence, mastectomy, larger tumor size, and shorter tumor-nipple distance were associated with 3+ positive nodes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Larger tumor size and shorter tumor-nipple distance were associated with higher lymph node positivity. Age less than 60, LVI, recurrence, mastectomy, larger tumor size, and shorter tumor-nipple distance were all associated with 3+ positive lymph nodes.