Prognostic Role for Primary Tumor Location in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparison of Right-Sided Colon, Left-Sided Colon, and Rectum.

BACKGROUND: Although right-sided colon cancer is increasingly recognized as having a worse prognosis than left-sided colorectal cancer for colorectal liver metastases, little is known about the differences between the left-sided colon and rectum. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the prognostic value of primary tumor location in patients with colorectal liver metastases by examining the left-sided colon and rectum separately. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study from 2003 to 2017. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a National Cancer Center Hospital. PATIENTS: The study cohort included 489 patients with colorectal liver metastases from right-sided colon cancer ( n = 119, 24%), left-sided colon cancer ( n = 251, 51%), or rectal cancer ( n = 119, 24%) who underwent hepatic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Five-year relapse-free survival rates for patients with right-sided colon cancer, left-sided colon cancer, and rectal cancer were 28.6%, 34.1%, and 26.4%, and 5-year overall survival rates were 53.9%, 70.3%, and 60.8%. Multivariable analysis revealed significant differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer (relapse-free survival: HR = 1.37, p = 0.03; overall survival: HR = 1.49, p = 0.03) and between left-sided colon cancer and right-sided colon cancer (relapse-free survival: HR = 1.39, p = 0.02; overall survival: HR = 1.60, p = 0.01), but not between right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer. In patients with recurrence ( n = 325), left-sided colon cancer had the lowest multiple-site recurrence rate and the highest surgical resection rate for recurrence (left-sided colon cancer, 20%/46%; right-sided colon cancer, 32%/30%; rectal cancer, 26%/39%). LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective in design. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer was associated with worse relapse-free survival and overall survival compared with left-sided colon cancer in patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection. Our findings suggest that the left-sided colon and rectum should be considered distinct entities in colorectal liver metastases. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B882 . PAPEL PRONSTICO DE LA UBICACIN DEL TUMOR PRIMARIO EN PACIENTES CON METSTASIS HEPTICAS COLORRECTALES UNA COMPARACIN ENTRE COLON DERECHO, COLON IZQUIERDO Y RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Aunque se reconoce cada vez más que el cáncer de colon del lado derecho tiene un peor pronóstico que el cáncer colorrectal del lado izquierdo para las metástasis hepáticas colorrectales, se sabe poco acerca de las diferencias entre el recto y el colon del lado izquierdo.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó el valor pronóstico de la ubicación del tumor primario en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales examinando el recto y el colon del lado izquierdo por separado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de 2003 a 2017.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un Hospital del Centro Nacional de Cáncer.PACIENTES:La cohorte del estudio incluyó a 489 pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales de cáncer de colon del lado derecho (n = 119, 24%), cáncer de colon del lado izquierdo (n = 251, 51%) o cáncer de recto (n = 119, 24%). %) que fueron sometidos a resección hepática.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Los resultados primarios fueron la supervivencia sin recaídas y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:Las tasas de supervivencia sin recaída a cinco años para los pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho, cáncer de colon izquierdo y cáncer de recto fueron del 28,6%, 34,1%, y 26,4%, respectivamente, y las tasas de supervivencia general a los 5 años fueron del 53,9%, 70,3%, y 60,8%, respectivamente. El análisis multivariable reveló diferencias significativas en la supervivencia sin recaída y la supervivencia general entre el cáncer de colon izquierdo y el cáncer de recto (supervivencia sin recaída: HR = 1,37, p = 0,03; supervivencia general: HR = 1,49, p = 0,03) y entre el cáncer de colon izquierdo y el cáncer de colon del lado derecho (supervivencia libre de recaídas: HR = 1,39, p = 0,02; supervivencia global: HR = 1,60, p = 0,01), pero no entre el cáncer de colon del lado derecho y el cáncer de recto. En pacientes con recurrencia (n = 325), el cáncer de colon izquierdo tuvo la tasa de recurrencia en sitios múltiples más baja y la tasa de resección quirúrgica más alta por recurrencia (cáncer de colon izquierdo, 20%/46%; cáncer de colon derecho, 32%/30%; cáncer de recto, 26%/39%).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue de diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El cáncer de recto se asoció con una peor supervivencia sin recaída y una supervivencia general peor en comparación con el cáncer de colon izquierdo en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales que se sometieron a resección hepática. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que el colon y el recto del lado izquierdo deben considerarse entidades distintas en las metástasis hepáticas colorrectales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B882 . (Tradducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy for Elderly Patients with Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis with the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score.

The feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients remains unclear, as these patients usually present with comorbidities. Recently, the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has drawn attention as an evaluation score of patients' general status as well as a predictor of survival. We retrospectively analyzed overall survival in 424 patients aged ≥75 years with colon cancer, who underwent curative surgery (laparoscopic (n = 167) or open surgery (n = 257)) between January 2004 and December 2013. To adjust for heterogeneity in both groups, a propensity score-matched analysis was performed, with the CONUT score as a confounding covariate. 5-year overall survival rates of patients with normal (0-1), mildly abnormal (2-4), or abnormal (≥5) CONUT score were 88.6%, 79.4%, and 41.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). T3 or less, N negative, late period (2009-2013), and normal CONUT score were associated with the tendency to undergo laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.001). The analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort (124 pairs) revealed that patients in the laparoscopic surgery group had a similar prognosis to those in the open surgery group, with a 5-year overall survival of 91.9% vs. 82.0%, respectively (p = 0.102). Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is an acceptable surgical approach in elderly patients.

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a preoperative risk assessment index for older patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of preoperative general condition to predict postoperative outcomes is important, particularly in older patients who typically suffer from various comorbidities and exhibit impaired functional status. In addition to various indices such as Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index (NIA/NCI), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA-PS), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is recently gaining attention as a tool to evaluate the general condition of patients from a nutritional perspective. However, the utility of these indices in older patients with colorectal cancer has not been compared. METHODS: The study population comprised 830 patients with Stage I - IV colorectal cancer aged 75 years or older who underwent surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014. Associations of each index with overall survival (OS) (long-term outcome) and postoperative complications (short-term outcome) were examined. RESULTS: For the three indices with the highest Akaike information criterion values (i.e., CONUT score, CCI and ACE-27), but not the remaining indices (NIA/NCI and ASA-PS), OS significantly worsened as general condition scores decreased, after adjusting for known prognostic factors. In contrast, for postoperative complications, only CONUT score was identified as a predictive factor (≥4 versus 0-3; odds ratio: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.13-3.13; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: For older patients with colorectal cancer, only CONUT score was a predictive factor of both long-term and short-term outcomes after surgery, suggesting that CONUT score is a useful preoperative risk assessment index.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei of a mature ovarian teratoma caused by mismatch repair deficiency in a patient with Lynch syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 1-2 cases per million individuals per year. PMP is characterized by the accumulation of abundant mucinous or gelatinous fluid derived from disseminated tumorous cells. Most of the tumorous cells are originated from rupture of appendiceal neoplasms, but some are from the metastasis of cancer of the colon, ovary, fallopian tube, urachus, colorectum, gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, lung and breast. Although frequent mutations in KRAS and/or GNAS genes have been reported, precise molecular mechanism underlying PMP remains to be elucidated. It is of note that mucinous tumour is one of the frequent histological features of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS), an autosomal dominantly inherited disease caused by a germline mutation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes including human mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), human mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), human mutS homolog 6 (MSH6), and postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2). Therefore, typical LS-associated tumours show mismatch repair instability. Although LS patients are most strongly predisposed to CRC, PMPs from mucinous CRC have not been reported in LS patients. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we report a case of PMP originating from an ovarian teratoma in a LS patient. The patient had surgical treatment of PMP arising from an ovarian teratoma at the age of 38 years, and later developed a transverse colon cancer at the age of 40. The patient's family history fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria, and genetic analysis of the peripheral leukocytes identified a germ line mutation in the MLH1 gene (MLH1 c.1546dupC p.Q516PfsX3). Interestingly, immunohistochemical staining showed that the expression of MLH1 was lost in the colon cancer as well as the ovarian teratoma. Consistent with the loss of MLH1 expression, both tumours showed high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). CONCLUSION: This case suggested that LS patients may develop various types of tumours including ovarian PMP, and that mismatch repair deficiency may play a role in the development of PMP derived from, at least, a part of ovarian teratomas.

Prognostic differences between oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease after resection in patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival data are lacking, and prognostic factors are not well-defined for patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases. This study evaluated the outcomes after resection of oligometastatic hepatic or lung metastases from colorectal cancer and sought to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 1,123 patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or pulmonary metastases who underwent curative surgery between January 1991 and December 2016. RESULTS: Of the 1,123 patients, 719 had hepatic metastases, 287 had pulmonary metastases, and 117 had both. The 5-year overall survival rate was 52.3% in the hepatic metastases group, 70.4% in the pulmonary metastases group, and 71.4% in the hepatic and pulmonary metastases group (P < .001). In total, 1,045 patients had oligometastases (1-5 metastatic lesions in 1 or 2 organs) and 78 had polymetastases (≥6 metastases in 1 or 2 organs). Prognosis was significantly better in patients with oligometastases than in those with polymetastases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 59.0% in the oligometastases group and 35.3% in the polymetastases group (P < .001); the respective 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 37.5% and 11.6% (P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified predictors of both poor overall survival and relapse-free survival to be a high carcinoembryonic antigen level before the first metastasectomy, largest metastasis measuring ≥2 cm, polymetastases, and synchronous metastases. CONCLUSION: Prognosis after curative resection was better in patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer in the liver or lung than in those with polymetastases. Multidisciplinary decision-making strategies, including about surgery, should be based on number of metastases rather than their site.