Repeated lung volume reduction surgery is successful in selected patients.

OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves dyspnoea, quality of life and may even prolong survival in carefully selected patients with end-stage emphysema. The benefit may be sustained for several years and vanishes with the natural progression of the disease. Data on repeated surgical treatment of emphysema are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effects and outcomes of repeated LVRS (Re-LVRS) in patients no longer benefiting from their initial LVRS. METHODS: Between June 2002 and December 2013, 22 patients (9 females) with advanced emphysema underwent Re-LVRS at a median of 60 months (25-196) after their initial LVRS. While initial LVRS was performed thoracoscopically as a bilateral procedure, Re-LVRS was performed unilaterally by a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique in 19 patients and, due to adhesions, by thoracotomy in 3 patients. Pulmonary function test (PFT) was performed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Lung function at Re-LVRS was similar to that prior to the first LVRS. The 90-day mortality rate was 0%. The first patient died 15 months postoperatively. The median hospitalization time after Re-LVRS was significantly longer compared with the initial LVRS [14 days, interquartile range (IQR): 11-19, vs 9 days, IQR: 8-14; P = 0.017]. The most frequent complication was prolonged air leak with a median drainage time of 11 days (IQR: 6-13); reoperations due to persistent air leak were necessary in 7 patients (32%). Five patients (23%) had no complications. Lung function and Medical Research Council (MRC) score improved significantly for up to 12 months after Re-LVRS, with results similar to those after initial bilateral LVRS. The average increase in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 25% (a 7% increase over the predicted value or 0.18 l) at 3 months, and the mean reduction in hyperinflation, assessed by relative decrease in RV/TLC (residual volume/total lung capacity), was 12% at 3 months (a decrease of 8% in absolute ratios). The mean MRC breathlessness score decreased significantly after 3 months (from 3.7 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Re-LVRS can be performed successfully in carefully selected patients as a palliative treatment. It may be performed as a bridge to transplantation or in patients with newly diagnosed intrapulmonary nodules or during elective cardiac surgery. Morbidity is acceptable and outcomes may be satisfactory with significantly improved lung function and reduced dyspnoea for at least 12 months postoperatively.

First clinical results of (D)-18F-Fluoromethyltyrosine (BAY 86-9596) PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: (D)-(18)F-fluoromethyltyrosine (d-(18)F-FMT), or BAY 86-9596, is a novel (18)F-labeled tyrosine derivative rapidly transported by the l-amino acid transporter (LAT-1), with a faster blood pool clearance than the corresponding l-isomer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of tumor detection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) compared with inflammatory and physiologic tissues in direct comparison to (18)F-FDG. METHODS: 18 patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC (n = 10) or HNSCC (n = 8) were included in this Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective multicenter study. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans within 21 d before d-(18)F-FMT PET/CT. For all patients, safety and outcome data were assessed. RESULTS: No adverse reactions were observed related to d-(18)F-FMT. Fifty-two lesions were (18)F-FDG-positive, and 42 of those were malignant (34 histologically proven and 8 with clinical reference). Thirty-two of the 42 malignant lesions were also d-(18)F-FMT-positive, and 10 lesions had no tracer uptake above the level of the blood pool. Overall there were 34 true-positive, 8 true-negative, 10 false-negative, and only 2 false-positive lesions for d-(18)F-FMT, whereas (18)F-FDG was true-positive in 42 lesions, with 10 false-positive and only 2 false-negative, resulting in a lesion-based detection rate for d-(18)F-FMT and (18)F-FDG of 77% and 95%, respectively, with an accuracy of 78% for both tracers. A high d-(18)F-FMT tumor-to-blood pool ratio had a negative correlation with overall survival (P = 0.050), whereas the (18)F-FDG tumor-to-blood pool ratio did not correlate with overall survival. CONCLUSION: d-(18)F-FMT imaging in patients with NSCLC and HNSCC is safe and feasible. The presented preliminary results suggest a lower sensitivity but higher specificity for d-(18)F-FMT over (18)F-FDG, since there is no d-(18)F-FMT uptake in inflammation. This increased specificity may be particularly beneficial in areas with endemic granulomatous disease and may improve clinical management. Further clinical investigations are needed to determine its clinical value and relevance for the prediction of survival prognosis.