Naloxone analogy and opioid overdose terminology preferences among rural caregivers: Differences by race.

BACKGROUND: Despite national and state policies aimed at increasing naloxone access via pharmacies, opioid overdose death rates rose during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among Blacks and American Indians (AIs) in rural areas. Caregivers, or third parties who can administer naloxone during an overdose event, are important individuals in the naloxone administration cascade, yet no studies have explored rural caregivers' opioid overdose terminology and naloxone analogy preferences or whether these preferences differ by race. OBJECTIVES: To identify rural caregivers' overdose terminology and naloxone analogy preferences and determine whether preferences differ by race. METHODS: A sample of 40 caregivers who lived with someone at high risk of overdose and used pharmacies in 4 largely rural states was recruited. Each caregiver completed a demographic survey and a 20- to 45-minute audio-recorded semi-structured interview that was transcribed, de-identified, and imported into a qualitative software package for thematic analysis by 2 independent coders using a codebook. Overdose terminology and naloxone analogy preferences were analyzed for differences by race. RESULTS: The sample was 57.5% white, 35% Black, and 7.5% AIs. Many participants (43%) preferred that pharmacists use the term "bad reaction" to refer to overdose events over the terms "accidental overdose" (37%) and "overdose" (20%). The majority of white and Black participants preferred "bad reaction" while AI participants preferred "accidental overdose." For naloxone analogies, "EpiPen" was most preferred (64%), regardless of race. "Fire extinguisher" (17%), "lifesaver" (9.5%), and other analogies (9.5%) were preferred by some white and Black participants but not AI participants. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pharmacists should use the "bad reaction" term and "EpiPen" analogy when counseling rural caregivers about overdose and naloxone, respectively. Caregivers' preferences varied by race, suggesting that pharmacists may want to tailor the terminology and analogy they use when discussing naloxone with caregivers.

Access to inclusive and culturally sensitive mental healthcare in Black, Indigenous, and People of Color pharmacy students and residents.

PURPOSE: Disparities in accessing culturally sensitive mental healthcare exist and may be exacerbated in pharmacy trainees. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to culturally sensitive mental healthcare and how to improve access for racially and ethnically minoritized pharmacy students and residents. METHODS: This institutional review board-exempt study included in-person and virtual focus groups. Eligible participants were first-, second-, third-, and fourth-year doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students and pharmacy residents completing a postgraduate year 1 or 2 program who identified as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Barriers to care, identity's influence on seeking care, and areas in which the training programs are doing well or areas for improvement were assessed. Responses were transcribed and analyzed using an open coding system by 2 reviewers, followed by discussion as a team to reach consensus. RESULTS: This study enrolled 8 first-year, 5 second-year, 7 third-year, and 2 fourth-year PharmD students and 4 residents (N = 26). Barriers to care included time, access to resources, and internal and external stigma. Identity barriers included cultural and family stigma and lack of representation in therapists with regard to race, ethnicity, and gender. Areas going well included supportive faculty and paid time off, while areas for improvement included wellness days, reduced workload, and increased diversity within the workforce. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to identify barriers to culturally sensitive mental healthcare in pharmacy trainees who identify as BIPOC while providing insight on how to increase culturally sensitive mental healthcare resources.