Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Chir Belg ; 124(4): 274-280, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The risks and benefits of preoperative aspirin continuation in patients undergoing isolated heart valve replacement surgery are unclear. We investigated the effect of aspirin continuation on the risk of bleeding and transfusion in these patients. METHODS: In this single center, retrospective study, among 474 adult patients who underwent isolated heart valve surgery between April 2013 and June 2018, 269 continued aspirin within 5 days before surgery (aspirin group) and 205 patients did not take or stopped aspirin no later than 5 days before surgery (non-aspirin group). The chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, and the Student's T-test were used to compare data between the groups. Univariate and Multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess crude and adjusted relationships between outcome and exposure. RESULTS: The primary outcome, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, occurred in 59 patients (22%) of the aspirin group and in 24 patients (12%) of the non-aspirin group (p = 0.004). After adjustment for confounding factors, continuation of aspirin was no longer associated with RBC transfusion (aOR1.8;95%CI,0.98-3.2;p = 0.06). The amount of allogenic blood products, the incidence of surgical re-exploration for bleeding, the volume of re-transfused cell-saved blood, and the cumulative chest tube drainage during the first 24 postoperative hours were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative continuation of aspirin in patients undergoing isolated heart valve surgery is neither associated with a higher incidence of RBC transfusion, nor with larger perioperative blood loss, or more frequent surgical revision for bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05151796).


Assuntos
Aspirina , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Humanos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia
2.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 36(10): 772-777, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31169651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be considered minor surgery, but it may result in severe postoperative pain. Subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, which produces long-lasting supra-umbilical parietal analgesia, might improve analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether subcostal TAP block would reduce opioid consumption and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients provided with multimodal analgesia. DESIGN: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital from December 2017 to June 2018. PATIENTS: Sixty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia (etoricoxib, paracetamol, ketamine and dexamethasone) were standardised. INTERVENTION: After induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated into two groups: ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal TAP block with 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.375% and epinephrine 5 µg ml or 0.9% saline with epinephrine 5 µg ml. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opioid consumption in the recovery room and during the first 24 h after surgery were recorded. Postoperative somatic and visceral pain scores, fatigue and nausea were measured. Intra-operative end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane (FETSEVO) were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four hour postoperative opioid consumption were similar in both groups: 21.2 mg (95% CI 15.3 to 27.1) vs. 25.2 (95% CI 15.1 to 35.5) oral morphine equivalent in the levobupivacaine and 0.9% saline groups, respectively; P = 0.48. No significant between-group differences were observed with regards to parietal (P = 0.56) and visceral (P = 0.50) pain scores, fatigue and nausea. FETSEVO was slightly lower in the levobupivacaine group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Subcostal TAP block does not improve the analgesia provided by multimodal analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It allows for a small reduction in intra-operative sevoflurane requirements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT0339153.


Assuntos
Músculos Abdominais/efeitos dos fármacos , Analgesia/métodos , Colecistectomia , Laparoscopia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Etoricoxib/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor , Sevoflurano/administração & dosagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Dor Visceral/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa