Mode of delivery and postpartum depression: the role of patient preferences.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between strength of preference for vaginal delivery, delivery mode undergone, and postpartum depression. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal study of delivery-mode preferences. During an interview between 24-36 weeks of gestation, participants were asked whether they preferred vaginal or cesarean delivery; the strength of this preference was measured by the standard gamble metric. Depression was assessed antepartum and at 8-10 weeks and 6-8 months after delivery by using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The primary outcome was PHQ-9 score at 8-10 weeks after delivery. We used multivariable regression analysis to assess the effect of strength of preference for vaginal delivery and delivery mode undergone on postpartum depression. RESULTS: Of 160 participants, 33.1% were nulliparous, and 30.6% had a previous cesarean delivery. Most of the participants (92.4%) preferred vaginal delivery, but the strength of preference varied substantially. The mean strength-of-preference score (0-1 scale; higher scores denote stronger vaginal delivery preference) was 0.658 (SD, ±0.352). A significant interaction emerged between the effects of delivery mode and vaginal delivery preference score on postpartum PHQ-9 score (P = .047). Specifically, a stronger preference for vaginal delivery was associated with higher PHQ-9 scores among women who underwent cesarean delivery (P = .027) but not among women who underwent vaginal delivery (P = .761). The interaction between delivery mode and vaginal delivery preference score was no longer significant at 6-8 months after delivery. CONCLUSION: Women who have a strong antepartum preference for vaginal delivery and deliver by cesarean may be at increased risk for depression in the early postpartum period.

Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess women's preferences for vaginal vs cesarean delivery in 4 contexts: prior cesarean delivery, twins, breech presentation, and absent indication for cesarean. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of pregnant women at 24-40 weeks' gestation. After assessing stated preferences for vaginal or cesarean delivery, we used the standard gamble metric to measure the strength of these preferences and the time tradeoff metric to determine how women value the potential processes and outcomes associated with these 2 delivery approaches. RESULTS: Among the 240 participants, 90.8% had a stated preference for vaginal delivery. Across the 4 contexts, these women indicated that, on average, they would accept a 59-75% chance of an attempted vaginal birth ending in a cesarean delivery before choosing a planned cesarean delivery, indicating strong preferences for spontaneous, uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Variations in preferences for labor processes emerged. Although uncomplicated labor ending in vaginal birth was assigned mean utilities of 0.993 or higher (on a 0-1 scale, with higher scores indicating more preferred outcomes), the need for oxytocin, antibiotics, or operative vaginal delivery resulted in lower mean scores, comparable with those assigned to uncomplicated cesarean delivery. Substantially lower scores (ranging from 0.432 to 0.598) were obtained for scenarios ending in severe maternal or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Although most women expressed strong preferences for vaginal delivery, their preferences regarding interventions frequently used to achieve that goal varied. These data underscore the importance of educating patients about the process of labor and delivery to facilitate incorporation of informed patient preferences in shared decision making regarding delivery approach.