Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Molecules ; 24(24)2019 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31817260

RESUMO

An in situ tracing study based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was conducted to investigate the uptake and elimination of organophosphorus pesticides in apples. A matrix-compatible polydimethylsiloxane/poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene)/polydimethylsiloxane fiber was produced to meet the needs of in situ sampling. The fiber had high extraction ability, good sensitivity and accuracy with respect to the analytes in apple pulp, and could be used 85 times. Although the sampling rate was changing over time, quantification was still achieved by the sampling rate calibration method. Some factors that affect its applicability were studied. The limits of detection were 0.18 ng/g for diazinon and 0.20 ng/g for chlorpyrifos, rather lower than the maximum residue limits of the National Food Safety Standard of China (GB 2763-2016) and the European Commission (Reg.(EU) No 834/2013, 2018/686). The accuracy of in situ SPME quantification was verified by comparing with the results obtained by the traditional liquid-liquid extraction method. In this work, the in situ sampling method is developed using apples, diazinon, and chlorpyrifos as a model system; however, this method can be used for in vivo analysis of fruits and vegetables for nutrition and safety monitoring.


Assuntos
Malus/química , Compostos Organofosforados/análise , Praguicidas/análise , Microextração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Calibragem , Clorpirifos/análise , Cromatografia Gasosa , Diazinon/análise , Temperatura
2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(1)2022 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35054339

RESUMO

Improving the assessment of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 lesions and reducing unnecessary biopsies are urgent clinical issues. In this prospective study, a radiomic nomogram based on the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) was constructed to identify benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions and evaluate its value in reducing unnecessary biopsies. A total of 223 histologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions were enrolled and assigned to the training and validation cohorts. A radiomic score was generated from the axial, sagittal, and coronal ABVS images. Combining the radiomic score and clinical-ultrasound factors, a radiomic nomogram was developed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The nomogram integrating the radiomic score, lesion size, and BI-RADS 4 subcategories showed good discrimination between malignant and benign BI-RADS 4 lesions in the training (AUC, 0.959) and validation (AUC, 0.925) cohorts. Moreover, 42.5% of unnecessary biopsies would be reduced by using the nomogram, but nine (4%) malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions were unfortunately missed, of which 4A (77.8%) and small-sized (<10 mm) lesions (66.7%) accounted for the majority. The ABVS radiomics nomogram may be a potential tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4 lesions, but its ability to detect small BI-RADS 4A lesions needs to be improved.

3.
J BUON ; 24(1): 48-60, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30941951

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Classically, wire-guided localization (WGL) is used for the localization of non palpable breast lesions. On the other hand, many studies report a newer technique called radioactive seed localization (RSL). The purpose of our study was a systematic review and meta analysis of the two techniques regarding the rate of positive margins and the quantity of excised tissue. METHODS: Our study searched publications up to March 24th 2018 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library regarding studies comparing the two techniques of localization of subclinical lesions with WGL or RSL using technetium 99m as radioactive agent. The primary target was the rate of positive margins and the second was the rate of second surgery for reexcision. Revman5.3 and STATE12.0 were used for the statistics. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 cohort studies comprising 3879 breast cancer patients were included. RSL was significantly superior than WGL both in better margin status (RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92, p=0.01) and reduced reoperation rate (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88, p=0.004). Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no different ability of both techniques in terms of free margin status (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.31, p=0.46) and reoperation rate (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.48-1.32, p=0.38). Further subgroup analysis excluding three studies with different ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) proportion exhibited same efficacy in margin negativity (RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.69-1.01, p=0.07) and further operation rate (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.01, p=0.07).


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Radioisótopos do Iodo , Inoculação de Neoplasia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Marcadores Fiduciais , Humanos , Margens de Excisão , Mastectomia Segmentar
4.
Int J Surg ; 23(Pt A): 75-81, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26384836

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether the additional Braun enteroenterostomy (BEE) is necessary in decreasing delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of the additional BEE in reducing DGE after PD. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Articles published before May 15, 2015 comparing BEE with traditional gastrojejunostomy during PD were selected. The evaluated end points consist of intro-operative outcomes as well as postoperative complications. RESULTS: Seven observational clinical studies that recruited 1401 patients were included. This meta-analysis indicated that the occurrence of DGE was lower in Braun group (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.60; P = 0.0007). Overall morbidity (OR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P = 0.0003) and the length of hospital stay (LOS) (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.80; 95%CI, -3.4 to -0.18; p = 0.03) were also in favor of the Braun group. However, Braun group had no advantage over Non-Braun group in terms of intra-operative blood loss, mortality, pancreatic fistula, bile Leakage and intra-abdominal abscess. CONCLUSION: The additional of BEE plays an important role in reducing DGE, overall morbidity and LOS.


Assuntos
Enterostomia/métodos , Gastroparesia/cirurgia , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Gastroparesia/etiologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa