Hepatic absorbed radiation dosimetry during I-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) therapy for refractory neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the prediction of therapeutic hepatic radiation-absorbed dose rates from tracer imaging plus a linearity assumption to estimation based on intra-therapy imaging in (131)I metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) therapy of refractory neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conjugate-view images of the liver were obtained before therapy for seven patients at seven times after a tracer infusion of (131)I MIBG and at three times after the therapy infusion. Measured liver activities were converted to dose-rate estimates. Three statistical models of the rates assuming double exponential dependences on time were examined. One of the three models allowed for a multiplicative correction to the therapeutic late-phase dose-rate amplitude. Results from that model: (1) the tracer prediction of the late-phase absorbed-dose-rate amplitude was a factor of 1.75 times the intra-therapy-estimated value, and (2) the difference between tracer prediction of the radiation-absorbed dose and intra-therapy estimation of it was statistically significant, and (3) the liver radiation-absorbed dose did not reach 30 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: A statistical modeling analysis finds that the radiation-absorbed dose after therapy appears to be lower than that which is predicted from the linear scaling with administered activity of the tracer radiation-absorbed dose. Hepatocyte toxicity is the most likely reason but it is not high enough to produce clinically observable results.

Malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a phase II study of therapy with high-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG).

Thirty patients with malignant pheochromocytoma (PHEO) or paraganglioma (PGL) were treated with high-dose 131I-MIBG. Patients were 11-62 (mean 39) years old: 19 patients males and 11 females. Nineteen patients had PGL, three of which were multifocal. Six PGLs were nonsecretory. Eleven patients had PHEO. All 30 patients had prior surgery. Fourteen patients were refractory to prior radiation or chemotherapy before 131I-MIBG. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected and cryopreserved. 131I-MIBG was synthesized on-site, by exchange-labeling 131I with 127I-MIBG in a solid-phase Cu2+-catalyzed exchange reaction. 131I-MIBG was infused over 2 h via a peripheral IV. Doses ranged from 557 mCi to 1185 mCi (7.4 mCi/kg to 18.75 mCi/kg). Median dose was 833 mCi (12.55 mCi/kg). Marrow hypoplasia commenced 3 weeks after 131I-MIBG therapy. After the first 131I-MIBG therapy, 19 patients required platelet transfusions; 19 received GCSF; 12 received epoeitin or RBCs. Four patients received a PBSC infusion. High-dose 131I-MIBG resulted in the following overall tumor responses in 30 patients: 4 sustained complete remissions (CRs); 15 sustained partial remissions (PRs); 1 sustained stable disease (SD); 5 progressive disease (PD); 5 initial PRs or SD but relapsed to PD. Twenty-three of the 30 patients remain alive; deaths were from PD (5), myelodysplasia (1), and unrelated cause (1). Overall predicted survival at 5 years is 75% (Kaplan Meier estimate). For patients with metastatic PHEO or PGL, who have good *I-MIBG uptake on diagnostic scanning, high-dose 131I-MIBG therapy was effective in producing a sustained CR, PR, or SD in 67% of patients, with tolerable toxicity.

Tumor response and toxicity with multiple infusions of high dose 131I-MIBG for refractory neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: (131)I Metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-MIBG) is an effective targeted radiotherapeutic for neuroblastoma with response rates greater than 30% in refractory disease. Toxicity is mainly limited to myelosuppression. The aim of this study was to determine the response rate and hematologic toxicity of multiple infusions of (131)I-MIBG. PROCEDURE: Patients received two to four infusions of (131)I-MIBG at activity levels of 3-19 mCi/kg per infusion. Criteria for subsequent infusions were neutrophil recovery without stem cell support and lack of disease progression after the first infusion. RESULTS: Sixty-two infusions were administered to 28 patients, with 24 patients receiving two infusions, two patients receiving three infusions, and two patients receiving four infusions. All patients were heavily pre-treated, including 16 with prior myeloablative therapy. Eleven patients (39%) had overall disease response to multiple therapies, including eight patients with measurable responses to each of two or three infusions, and three with a partial response (PR) after the first infusion and stable disease after the second. The main toxicity was myelosuppression, with 78% and 82% of patients requiring platelet transfusion support after the first and second infusion, respectively, while only 50% had grade 4 neutropenia, usually transient. Thirteen patients did not recover platelet transfusion independence after their final MIBG infusion; stem cell support was given in ten patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple therapies with (131)I-MIBG achieved increasing responses, but hematologic toxicity, especially to platelets, was dose limiting. More effective therapy might be given using consecutive doses in rapid succession with early stem cell support.