Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Management of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Preliminary Study.

INTRODUCTION: Liver metastases are common in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. The role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is not well understood in this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SABR in treating well-differentiated neuroendocrine liver metastases (WD-NELM). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with WD-NELM treated with SABR was conducted between January 2015 and July 2019. Demographic, treatment, and clinical/radiographic follow-up data were abstracted. RECIST 1.1 criteria were applied to each individual target to evaluate the response to treatment. Local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Toxicity was reported according to the CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with a total of 53 liver metastases treated with SABR were identified. Most patients (68%) had midgut tumors, were grade 2 (80%), and had high-volume intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic disease (76%). The median number of liver metastases treated was 2, with a median size of 2.5 cm. The median radiation dose delivered was 50 Gy/5 fractions. The median follow-up was 14 months; 24 of the 25 patients were alive at the time of analysis. The objective response rate was 32%, with improvement or stability in 96% of lesions treated. The median time to best response was 9 months. The 1-year LC and PFS were 92 and 44%, respectively. No grade 3/4 acute or late toxicity was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Liver SABR is a safe and promising means of providing LC for WD-NELM. This treatment modality should be evaluated in selected patients in concert with strategies to manage systemic disease.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT to Evaluate Early Response in Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases Treated With Everolimus and Radiation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal method to evaluate response of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) to radiation treatment (RT) is unknown; tumor perfusion parameters were evaluated by using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) to correlate with efficacy in a prospective pilot study utilizing everolimus with radiotherapy for NELM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with progressive NELM received everolimus for 28 days prior to, concurrent with, and 14 days following radiation. Patients had a DCE-CT at baseline (t0), prior to radiation (t1) and 7 days after radiation (t2). Per lesion response was evaluated per standard response evaluation criteria (RECIST v1.1). Median statistics of the perfusion parameters were tabulated and included: blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and permeability (PS). Correlations between the parameters and the maximum percent change in size of the NELM at 12-months were explored. NELM not treated with radiation served as an internal control. RESULTS: Twenty-one treated NELM in 10 patients were evaluable. Compared to t0, BV increased at t1 (median 11%, range -15 to +37%, p=0.59), and then decreased significantly at t2 (median -8.4%, range -29 to +5.4%, p<0.03). A trend of increased BV in internal controls at each time point supports that the observed effect is due to radiation. Conventional objective response rate was 33%; no progression was seen within 12-months. CONCLUSION: Changes in DCE-CT were observed in patients receiving everolimus and radiation for NELM, with BV decreasing significantly following radiotherapy. Given the challenges in assessing response in NELM using traditional response evaluation criteria in any context, DCE-CT appears to be a promising modality.