Efficacy and safety of an insulin infusion protocol in a surgical ICU.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is associated with complications in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of nurse-driven insulin infusion protocols in lowering blood glucose (BG) in critical illness. STUDY DESIGN: All patients in a 24-bed surgical intensive care unit who required i.v. insulin infusions during 3 noncontiguous 6-month periods from 2002 to 2004 were evaluated. In the preintervention phase, 71 patients received a physician-initiated insulin infusion without a developed protocol. They were compared with 95 patients who received a nurse-driven insulin infusion protocol with a target BG of 120 to 150 mg/dL and to 119 patients who received a more stringent protocol with a target BG of 80 to 110 mg/dL. RESULTS: There was a stepwise decrease in average daily BG levels, from 190 to 163 to 132 mg/dL (p < 0.001). The less stringent protocol decreased the time to achieve a BG level < 150 mg/dL from 14.1 to 7.4 hours compared with physician-driven management (p < 0.05) resulting in similar time on an insulin infusion (53 versus 48 hours). The more intensive protocol brought BG levels < 150 mg/dL in 7.2 hours and < 111 mg/dL in 13.6 hours, but increased the length of time a patient was on an insulin infusion to 77 hours. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia (BG < 40 mg/dL) was statistically similar between the groups, ranging between 1.1% and 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a nurse-driven protocol led to more rapid and more effective BG control in critically ill surgical patients compared with physician management. Tighter BG control can be obtained without a significant increase in hypoglycemia, although this is associated with increased time on an insulin infusion.

The impact of bedside behavior on catheter-related bacteremia in the intensive care unit.

HYPOTHESIS: The success of an educational program in July 1999 that lowered the catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) rate in our intensive care unit (ICU) 3-fold is correlated with compliance with "best-practice" behaviors. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: Surgical ICU in a referral hospital. PATIENTS: A random sample underwent bedside audits of central venous catheter care (n = 187). All ICU admissions during a 39-month period (N = 4489) were prospectively followed for bacteremia. INTERVENTIONS: On the basis of audit results in December 2000, a behavioral intervention was designed to improve compliance with evidenced-based guidelines of central venous catheter management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with practices known to decrease CRBSI. Secondary outcome was CRBSI rate on all ICU patients. RESULTS: Multiple deficiencies were identified on bedside audits 18 months after the previous educational program. After the implementation of a separate behavioral intervention in July 2001, a second set of bedside audits in December 2001 demonstrated improvements in documenting the dressing date (11% to 21%; P<.001) and stopcock use (70% to 24%; P<.001), whereas nonsignificant trends were observed in hand hygiene (17% to 30%; P>.99) and maximal sterile barrier precautions (50% to 80%; P =.29). Appropriate practice was observed before and after the behavioral intervention in catheter site placement, dressing type, absence of antibiotic ointment, and proper securing of central venous catheters. Thirty-two CRBSIs occurred in 9353 catheter-days 24 months before the behavioral intervention compared with 17 CRBSIs in 6152 catheter-days during the 15 months after the intervention (3.4/1000 to 2.8/1000 catheter-days; P =.40). CONCLUSIONS: Although a previous educational program decreased the CRBSI rate, this was associated with only modest compliance with best practice principles when bedside audits were performed 18 months later. A behavioral intervention improved all identified deficiencies, leading to a nonsignificant decrease in CRBSIs.

Treatment of hypophosphatemia using a protocol based on patient weight and serum phosphorus level in a surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Hypophosphatemia may cause organ derangements in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a repletion protocol for hypophosphatemia based on admission weight and phosphorus level. STUDY DESIGN: All patients who presented to an 18-bed surgical intensive care unit with a serum phosphorus level of 2.2 mg/dL or less or who received phosphorus supplementation despite having normal levels were identified. In the preintervention phase between January and June 2001, 137 patients were retrospectively identified who met these criteria. A protocol was then designed giving a single intravenous dose of phosphorus based on weight and serum phosphorus. Repletion was given with sodium or potassium phosphorus based on presupplementation levels. After protocol implementation 141 patients met these criteria between September 2001 and February 2002, and treatment and postrepletion levels were followed prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were repleted before the intervention with adequate followup and 22 (47%) attained a normal level. Supplementation success was 53% in moderate hypophosphatemia (2.2 mg/dL or less) and 27% in severe hypophosphatemia (less than 1.5 mg/dL). After protocol implementation, 111 patients were repleted with 84 (76%) correcting to a normal level (p = 0.002 compared with retrospective patients). Success was 78% in moderate hypophosphatemia and 62% in severe hypophosphatemia. Inappropriate supplementation of normal phosphorus levels decreased from 51 to 16 patients after protocol implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol based on weight and serum levels successfully treated both moderate and severe hypophosphatemia in the majority of critically ill patients. Protocol implementation also decreased unnecessary supplementation of normal phosphorus levels.

Impact of a student-supported pharmacy assessment program on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the addition of a student-supported venous thromboembolism risk assessment strategy could improve rates of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: After receiving education and training on venous thromboembolism risk assessment, students assessed patients and recommended therapy in a 493-bed community teaching hospital over 5 weeks. Both the quantity and quality of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were measured and compared to a baseline rate. RESULTS: One hundred three recommendations were made to physicians with a 41% acceptance rate. Compared to previous rates, the percentages of patients receiving "any," "suitable," and "optimal" venous thromboembolism prophylaxis increased from 70.5% to 82.7% (p = 0.0005), 64.4% to 75.9% (p = 0.0022), and 56.3% to 68.5% (p = 0.0022), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A student-supported venous thromboembolism risk assessment strategy resulted in an increase in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates and could be used as a model for other institutions to integrate students into population-based care.