A Case of Status Epilepticus and Transient Stress Cardiomyopathy Associated with Smoking the Synthetic Psychoactive Cannabinoid, UR-144.

BACKGROUND Synthetic cannabinoids have a higher affinity for the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 than natural cannabinoids. Their use can be associated with cardiovascular disease and neurological complications. A case is reported of status epilepticus and stress cardiomyopathy following the recreational use of the synthetic cannabinoid, UR-144. CASE REPORT A 19-year-old woman presented to the emergency department in status epilepticus after smoking the synthetic cannabinoid known as 'space'. Recurring seizure activity was controlled after three hours. On hospital day 3, the patient developed severe biventricular failure. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis of stress cardiomyopathy. A comprehensive urine drug screen was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which was positive for UR-144, or (1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)-methanone, and negative for all other illicit recreational drugs. The patient improved at one week following admission, with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40%. She was discharged home on hospital day 10. CONCLUSIONS The use of the synthetic cannabinoid, UR-144, may be associated with prolonged status epilepticus and stress cardiomyopathy. Physicians should be aware of these potentially lethal complications associated with the recreational use of this and other illicit synthetic cannabinoids.

Government liability for the external cost of earthquake prediction

The implementation of earthquake prediction technology will raise several policy questions which have important legal implications. Central among these legal issues is that of the liability of government for the external costs of and actual earthquake prediction. This paper examines a broad range of alternative approaches to the distribution of costs, from total government assumption of liability to allowing the cost to be borne where they fall. An economic efficiency model is employed to assess the policy implications of the cost distribution alternatives. Central to this assessment is an analysis of the historical doctrine of sovereign immunity and of the behavior of different forms of government in response to varying cost distribution schemes. It is hypothesized that theories of liability based upon private conduct are not directly applicable to government behaviour