The Shear Stress-Regulated Expression of Glypican-4 in Endothelial Dysfunction In Vitro and Its Clinical Significance in Atherosclerosis.

Retention of circulating lipoproteins by their interaction with extracellular matrix molecules has been suggested as an underlying mechanism for atherosclerosis. We investigated the role of glypican-4 (GPC4), a heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycan, in the development of endothelial dysfunction and plaque progression; Expression of GPC4 and HS was investigated in human umbilical vein/artery endothelial cells (HUVECs/HUAECs) using flow cytometry, qPCR, and immunofluorescent staining. Leukocyte adhesion was determined in HUVECs in bifurcation chamber slides under dynamic flow. The association between the degree of inflammation and GPC4, HS, and syndecan-4 expressions was analyzed in human carotid plaques; GPC4 was expressed in HUVECs/HUAECs. In HUVECs, GPC4 protein expression was higher in laminar than in non-uniform shear stress regions after a 1-day or 10-day flow (p < 0.01 each). The HS expression was higher under laminar flow after a 1 day (p < 0.001). Monocytic THP-1 cell adhesion to HUVECs was facilitated by GPC4 knock-down (p < 0.001) without affecting adhesion molecule expression. GPC4 and HS expression was lower in more-inflamed than in less-inflamed plaque shoulders (p < 0.05, each), especially in vulnerable plaque sections; Reduced expression of GPC4 was associated with atherogenic conditions, suggesting the involvement of GPC4 in both early and advanced stages of atherosclerosis.

Comparison of long-term outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy or with modified balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Modified balloon angioplasty (MB) using a cutting-/scoring balloon or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is used in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, IVL is an off-label use in this setting. The aim of this subgroup analysis of an all-comers registry was to compare IVL to MB angioplasty in patients with ISR. METHODS: The subgroup (n = 117) included all patients with an ISR treated by MB or IVL between 2019 and 2021. Primary endpoint was strategy success (< 20% residual stenosis). The secondary endpoint was cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and target lesion failure/revascularization (TVR). Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of n = 36 patients were treated by IVL and n = 81 patients by MB. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the groups. The primary endpoint was reached in 99 patients (84.6%). Patients in the IVL group had less residual stenosis (2.8% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.012). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that IVL had a significant positive effect on reaching the primary end point (Estimate 2.857; standard error (SE) 1.166; p = 0.014). During the follow-up period (450 days) there were no significant differences in rates of cardiac death (IVL n = 2 (1.7%) vs. MB n = 3 (2.6%); p = 0.643), AMI (IVL n = 2 (1.7%) vs. MB n = 4 (3.4%); p = 0.999) and TVR (IVL n = 5 (4.3%) vs. MB n = 14 (12%); p = 0.851). CONCLUSION: IVL results in a significantly lower rate of residual stenosis than MB in patients with ISR. During the long-term follow-up, no differences in rates of cardiac death, AMI or TVR were observed.

Serial right heart catheter assessment between balloon pulmonary angioplasty sessions identify procedural factors that influence response to treatment.

BACKGROUND: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is delivered as a series of treatments for patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) however, there is little published data on the procedural determinants of outcome. METHODS: Pre- and post-BPA clinical and hemodynamic data, as well as serial hemodynamic and procedural data at each BPA session were evaluated to determine patient and procedure-related factors that influence hemodynamic response. RESULTS: Per procedure data from 210 procedures in 84 patients and per patient data from 182 procedures in 63 patients with completed treatment and 3-month follow-up were analyzed. A median of 3 (range 1-6) BPA procedures treating a median of 2 segments per procedure (range 1-3) were performed per patient with a median interval between procedures of 42 (range 5-491) days. Clinical outcome correlated with hemodynamic change (pulmonary vascular resistance [ΔPVR] vs Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review [CAMPHOR] symptom score: p < 0.001, Pearson's r = 0.48, n = 49). Responders to BPA had more severe disease at baseline and 37.5 % of non-responders were post-PEA. There was a dose-response relationship between per procedure and total number of segments treated and hemodynamic improvement (ΔPVR: 1 segment: -0.9%, 2: -14.5%, 3 or more: -16.1%, p < 0.001). Treating totally occluded vessels had a greater hemodynamic effect (mean pulmonary artery pressure [ΔmPAP]: sessions with occlusion: -8.0%, without occlusion treated: -3.2%, p < 0.05) without an increased complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of clinical benefit is related to the hemodynamic effect of BPA which in turn is related to the number of segments treated and lesion severity. Patients who were post-PEA were less likely to respond to BPA.