Higher immune cell radiation dose is correlated with poor tumor control and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) has been shown to correlate with the overall survival (OS) of patients who receive definitive thoracic radiotherapy. However, the planning target volume (PTV) may be a confounding factor. We assessed the prognostic value of EDRIC for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with homogeneous PTV. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC who underwent PORT between 2004 and 2019 were included. EDRIC was computed as a function of the number of radiation fractions and mean doses to the lungs, heart, and remaining body. The correlations between EDRIC and OS, disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the survival difference between low- and high-EDRIC groups. RESULTS: In total, 345 patients were analyzed. The mean EDRIC was 6.26 Gy. Multivariate analysis showed that higher EDRIC was associated with worse outcomes in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.207, P = .007), DFS (HR 1.129, P = .015), LRFS (HR 1.211, P = .002), and DMFS (HR 1.131, P = .057). In the low- and high-EDRIC groups, the 3-year OS was 81.2% and 74.0%, DFS 39.8% and 35.0%, LRFS 70.4% and 60.5%, and DMFS 73.9% and 63.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EDRIC is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. Higher doses of radiation to the immune system are associated with tumor progression and poor survival. Organs at risk for the immune system should be considered during radiotherapy planning.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) is a rapidly emerging paradigm for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this PRISMA/MOOSE/PICOD-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to assess the safety and efficacy of nIT, (2) to compare the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) versus chemotherapy alone (nCT), and (3) to explore predictors of pathologic response with nIT and their association with outcomes. METHODS: Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and the receipt of programmed death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 inhibitors before resection; other forms and modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. For statistical analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model was used, depending on the heterogeneity (I2 ). RESULTS: Sixty-six articles met the criteria (eight randomized studies, 39 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 19 retrospective studies). The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 28.1%. The estimated grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 18.0%. Compared with nCT, nCIT achieved higher rates of pCR (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49-12.97; p < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; p < .001), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.74; p = .0003) but yielded similar toxicity rates (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52; p = .97). The results remained robust on sensitivity analysis when all retrospective publications were removed. pCR was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.15-0.43; p < .001) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.67; p = .005). PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) were more likely to achieve a pCR (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.22-7.03; p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was safe and efficacious. nCIT improved pathologic response rates and PFS/OS over nCT, particularly in patients who had tumors that expressed PD-L1, without increasing toxicities. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This meta-analysis of 66 studies showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and efficacious. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoimmunotherapy improved pathologic response rates and survival, particularly for patients who had tumors that expressed programmed cell death ligand-1, without increasing toxicities.

Radiotherapy Improves Survival of Patients With Lymphovascular Invasion in pT1b Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for pT1b esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear whether additional radiotherapy can improve patient survival. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD for pT1b ESCC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study involving 11 hospitals in China. Between January 2010 and December 2019, patients with T1bN0M0 ESCC treated with or without adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD were included. Survival between groups was compared. RESULTS: Overall, 774 patients were screened, and 161 patients were included. Forty-seven patients (29.2%) received adjuvant radiotherapy after ESD (RT group) and 114 (70.8%) underwent ESD alone (non-RT group). There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the RT and non-RT groups. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was the only prognostic factor. In the LVI+ group, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved survival (5-year OS: 91.7% vs 59.5%, P = 0.050; 5-year DFS: 92.9% vs 42.6%, P = 0.010). In the LVI- group, adjuvant radiotherapy did not improve survival (5-year OS: 83.5% vs 93.9%, P = 0.148; 5-year DFS: 84.2% vs 84.7%, P = 0.907). The standardized mortality ratios were 1.52 (95% confidence interval 0.04-8.45) in the LVI+ group with radiotherapy and 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.15-1.42) in the LVI- group without radiotherapy. DISCUSSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy could improve survival in pT1b ESCC with LVI+ other than LVI- after ESD. Selective adjuvant radiotherapy based on LVI status achieved survival rates similar to those of the general population.

MiR-323a-3p acts as a tumor suppressor by suppressing FMR1 and predicts better esophageal squamous cell carcinoma outcome.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has unfavorable outcomes with the highest incidence seen in China. Accordingly, exploring effective molecular biomarkers is of great value. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression and modulate numerous biological processes in tumors. Our study aimed to identify prognostic miRNAs and investigate their role in ESCC. METHODS: Prognosis-related plasma miRNAs were detected by miRNA microarray and qRT-PCR. Functional assays and molecular mechanism studies were used to investigate the role of miRNA in ESCC. RESULTS: Over-expression of miR-323a-3p was associated with a favorable prognosis. MiR-323a-3p negatively regulated proliferation, migration, and invasion. Through biological predictions, the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) was found to be a potential target of miR-323a-3p. Further investigation revealed that miR-323a-3p directly targeted and suppressed FMR1. MiR-323a-3p and FMR1 mRNA, as well as miR-323a-3p and the FMR1-encoded protein FMRP, showed negative correlations. Luciferase activity of FMR1-3'-UTR, but not mutant counterparts, was decreased by mimic compared with that of the control. The compromised cell proliferation, migration, and invasion induced by transfection with miR-323a-3p mimic were rescued by transfection with a FMR1 expression plasmid. Tumors induced by miR-323a-3p overexpressed ESCC cells grew significantly slower in vivo and resulted in smaller tumor masses. Metastatic lung colonization was also inhibited by miR-323a-3p overexpression. CONCLUSIONS: MiR-323a-3p was significantly associated with survival and acted as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting proliferation, migration, and invasion via the regulation of FMR1. MiR-323a-3p is a promising biomarker and may be a potential therapeutic target.

A novel angular dependency model for MatriXX response and its application to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans.

PURPOSE: This paper proposes a model for the angular dependency of MatriXX response and investigates whether MatriXX, with the angular-model-based approach can be applied to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans. METHOD: This model attributes the angular dependence of MatriXX response to dynamical translation of its effective measurement plane (EMP) due to the change of beam angle. Considering this mechanism, true composite dose verifications for IMRT plans specified in AAPM TG 119 report using both MatriXX and Gafchromic EBT3 films were undertook and compared to validate the applicability of MatriXX for patient specific QA of composite beam IMRT plans. Dose verifications using MatriXX with and without angular-model-based approach were performed. RESULTS: MatriXX with angular-model-based approach achieved gamma passing rates with 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm criteria better than 98.3% and 98.1% respectively for true composite dose verification of plans in AAPM TG 119 report. The 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma passing rates using MatriXX without angular-model-based approach ranged from 85.8% to 98.2% and from 81.3% to 96.5%, respectively. The p-values from the single sided paired t-test indicated no statistical difference between the passing rates from MatriXX with angular-model-based approach and from films, and significant difference between the passing rates from uncorrected MatriXX and from films. CONCLUSION: The proposed model for angular dependent MatriXX response is necessary and effective. Dose verification using MatriXX with angular-model-based approach is acceptable for true composite beam IMRT plans with required accuracy to simplify patient specific QA.

Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), despite the sizable percentage of these patients in clinical practice. This study focused on the efficacy, toxicity and the optimal chemotherapy regimen of CCRT in ECOG 2 patients in a phase III trial. METHODS: Patients capable of all self-care with bed rest for less than 50% of daytime were classified as ECOG 2 subgroup. A subgroup analysis was performed for ECOG 2 patients recruited in the phase III trial receiving concurrent EP (etoposide + cisplatin)/PC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT). RESULTS: A total of 71 ECOG 2 patients were enrolled into the study. Forty-six (64.8%) patients were treated with IMRT technique. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for ECOG 2 patients were 16.4 months and 9 months, respectively. No difference was observed in treatment compliance and toxicities between ECOG 2 patients and ECOG 0-1 patients. Within the ECOG 2 group (31 in the EP arm and 40 in the PC arm), median OS and 3-year OS were 15.7 months and 37.5% for the EP arm, and 16.8 months and 7.5% for the PC arm, respectively (p = 0.243). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis was higher in the PC arm (17.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.014) with 5 radiation pneumonitis related deaths, while the incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was numerically higher in the EP arm (25.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: CCRT provided ECOG 2 patients promising outcome with acceptable toxicities. EP might be superior to PC in terms of safety profile in the setting of CCRT for ECOG 2 patients. Prospective randomized studies based on IMRT technique are warranted to validate our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01494558. (Registered 19 December 2011).

Debulking Surgery Plus Radiation: Treatment Choice for Unresectable Stage III Thymic Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Total resection may not be achieved in patients with thymic carcinoma, particularly those with Masaoka stage III disease. Debulking surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy and radiation alone are treatment options for such patients. We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) between patients with thymic carcinoma who underwent debulking surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy and those who underwent radiation alone. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients histologically diagnosed as having Masaoka stage III thymic carcinoma between January 1980 and January 2010. Patients were classified into the following groups according to treatments received: debulking surgery plus radiotherapy (group A) and radiotherapy alone (group B). Data on demographics, histology, invasion, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and survival were collected. Survival time was calculated and compared between the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. RESULTS: Of the 47 enrolled patients, 26 and 21 patients were categorized into groups A and B, respectively. There are no significant differences in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological type, great vessel invasion, and chemotherapy proportion between the groups. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy in both groups. The 5-year OS rates were 54.4 and 0% in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.019). No operation-induced mortality was recorded. CONCLUSION: For patients with unresectable Masaoka stage III disease, debulking surgery with radiotherapy is preferred, as this was proven to be more efficient than the radiation-alone procedure.

Postoperative radiotherapy is effective in improving survival of patients with stage pIII-N2 non-small-cell lung Cancer after pneumonectomy.

BACKGROUND: There were few reports of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in stage pIII-N2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving pneumonectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of PORT among these patients. METHODS: Between Jan. 2004 and Dec. 2015, stage pIII-N2 NSCLC patients receiving pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without PORT in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Totally 119 patients were included, 32 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT (PORT group) and 87 receiving adjuvant chemotherapy alone (Control group). There were more patients with non-R0 resection in PORT group than Control group (25% vs. 8%, p = 0.031). In PORT group, ≥Grade 2 radiation-induced pneumonitis was 2/32. No severe radiation-related heart injury was observed. There was no PORT-related death. Of all patients, median follow-up time was 25 months. Median overall survival time (mOS) and median disease-free survival time (mDFS) were 46 months and 15 months, respectively. The PORT group had significantly better OS (not reached vs. 34 months, p = 0.003), DFS (19 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.024), local recurrence free survival (LRFS, p = 0.012), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS, p = 0.047) than the Control group. As for failure pattern, PORT significantly reduced local regional failure rate (39.1% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.016). In subgroup analysis, patients with R0 resection (n = 104), OS and LRFS in PORT group were significantly longer, and PORT tended to increase DFS and DMFS. CONCLUSION: For patients with stage pIII-N2 NSCLC after pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT can improve OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS with tolerable toxicity.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy May Improve Local-Regional Tumor Control for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Compared With Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Consistent results are lacking as regards the comparative effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2002 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients irradiated with different techniques. The association between RT technique and survival indexes was assessed in a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance known confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 652 patients were eligible for analysis, including 206 with 3DCRT and 446 with IMRT. The median OS of the 3DCRT and IMRT groups were 19.4 and 23.3 months, with the 5-year rate of 13% and 19%, respectively (p = .043). Multivariate analysis identified IMRT as an independent favorable factor associated with LRPFS and DMFS. PSM analysis further verified the beneficial effect of IMRT on LRPFS. No difference in OS or PFS was observed between the two techniques. Subgroup analysis revealed that IMRT might be differentially more effective in both OS and LRPFS among patients who were female, nonsmokers, with adenocarcinoma, or without weight loss. There was a significant reduction of lung toxicity and similar esophagus toxicity in the IMRT group when compared with the 3DCRT group. CONCLUSION: IMRT may confer superior LRPFS and comparable OS than can be achieved with 3DCRT in LA-NSCLC, along with the reduction of pulmonary toxicity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Based on the largest number of patients from a single institution, the present study demonstrated that intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) could provide superior local-regional progression-free survival and similar overall survival compared with the traditional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). IMRT was also found to be associated with the significantly decreased incidence of pulmonary toxicity. These results suggest that IMRT should be considered a surrogate for 3DCRT in locally advanced NSCLC and might be the preferred option for a female nonsmoker with adenocarcinoma and a potentially high risk of pulmonary toxicity from radiotherapy.

Further understanding of an uncommon disease of combined small cell lung cancer: clinical features and prognostic factors of 114 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is an uncommon subgroup of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and few clinical data can be referred. Our study is to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of C-SCLC, as well as the role of multimodality treatment. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2012, patients with histologically diagnosed C-SCLC were retrospectively analyzed. The survivals were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled, with a median age of 59 (range: 20-79) years old. The most common combined component was squamous cell carcinoma (52.6%). Among these patients, the disease was stage I, II, III and IV in 9.6%, 19.3%, 46.5% and 24.6% of the patients, respectively. Eighty patients (70.2%) received at least two of the three modalities containing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The median follow-up was 32.5 months. The median time of overall survival (OS) was 26.2 months. On univariate analysis, smoking (P=0.029), Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <80 (P=0.000), advanced TNM stage (P=0.000), no surgery (P=0.010), positive resection margin (P=0.000), positive lymph nodes ≥4 (P=0.000), positive lymph node ratio >10% (P=0.000) and non-multimodality treatment (P=0.004) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that smoking, advanced TNM stage, positive resection margin and positive lymph nodes ratio >10% were poor prognostic features. CONCLUSIONS: C-SCLC has a relatively early stage and good prognosis, which may due to the underestimated diagnosis in non-surgical patients. Multimodality therapy is recommended, especially for limited disease. Smoking, advanced TNM stage, positive resection margin and positive lymph nodes ratio >10% are poor prognostic factors.

Consolidation chemotherapy may improve survival for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy--retrospective analysis of 203 cases.

BACKGROUND: For patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is partially defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CCT. METHODS: The characteristics of LA-NSCLC patients treated with curative concurrent CRT from 2001 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Among 203 patients, 113 (55.7 %) patients received CCT. The median number of delivered CCT was 3 and 89.4 % patients completed ≥2 cycles. The OS was significantly better for patients in the CCT group compared with that in the non-CCT group (median OS, 27 months vs. 16 months; 5-year OS, 30.4 % vs. 22.5 %; p = 0.012). The median PFS were 12 months in the CCT group and 9 months in the non-CCT group (p = 0.291). The survival advantages of CCT were significant for males (HR: 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.44 - 0.90), patients with age < 60 years (HR: 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.42 - 0.95), non-squamous histology (HR: 0.44; 95 % CI, 0.25 - 0.76), pretreatment KPS ≥ 80 (HR: 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.48 - 0.93), stage IIIb (HR: 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.43 - 0.95), stable disease (HR: 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.14 - 0.65) and radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI, 0.48 - 1.00). There was no significant difference between the CCT group and the non-CCT group regarding treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: CCT might further prolong survival compared with CRT alone for LA-NSCLC without increasing treatment-related toxicities, especially for males, patients with age < 60 years, non-squamous histology, pretreatment KPS ≥ 80, stage IIIb, stable disease and radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy. Large size prospective investigations that incorporate patient characteristics and treatment response are warranted to validate our findings.

[Outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: Clinical data of 251 patients with stage III (76 IIIA and 175 IIIB) NSCLC who received CCRT as initial treatment between Jan 2001 and Dec 2010 in our hospital were reviewed. A median total radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy (range, 50-74 Gy) were delivered. 174 patients were treated with IMRT, 51 with 3D-CRT and 26 with 2D-radiotherapy. EP chemotherapy regimen was administered in 112 patients, PC regimen in 99 patients, topotecan regimen in 18 patients and other regimens in the remaining 22 patients. The efficacy and toxicity of CCRT were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 244 patients were assessable for response, including 6 (2.5%) patients with CR, 183 (75.0%) with PR, 42 (17.2%) with SD and 13 (5.3%) with PD. At a median follow-up period of 20 months, the 1-, 3-, 5- year OS were 69.2%, 31.2%, 23.2%, respectively, and the median OS was 21 months. The 1-, 3-, 5- year PFS were 40.9%, 22.1%, 17.7%, respectively, and the median PFS was 10 months. Patients with stage IIIA NSCLC achieved better 5-year OS than that with IIIB NSCLC (29.2% vs. 20.7%, χ2=2.254, P=0.133). Failure pattern was assessable in 244 patients, including 61 (25.0%) locoregional progression alone, 55 (22.5%) distant metastasis alone and 77 (31.6%) with both. The rates of grade≥3 radiation pneumonitis, esophagitis and hematologic toxicity were 4.4%, 11.2% and 26.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CCRT provide stage III NSCLC patients favorable outcome with acceptable toxicity. CCRT is standard therapeutic approach for patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.

Effects of Local Treatment in Combination with Systemic Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Purpose: Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival benefits. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the addition of local therapy to systemic treatments in patients with advanced EC. Methods and Materials: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Key eligibility criteria included studies that enrolled patients with histologically confirmed EC or esophagogastric junction cancer with metastasis or recurrence and compared survival benefits between the combined local and systemic treatment group and the systemic treatment alone group. Survival outcomes, represented by hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were pooled using a random effects model. The MINORS score was adopted for quality assessment. Risk of bias was statistically examined by Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: A total of 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 qualified retrospective studies including 14,489 patients were identified. Addition of local therapy to systemic treatment significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; P < .0001) compared with systemic treatment alone. The subgroup analysis revealed that combined local and systemic treatment conferred a significant survival advantage in both patients with oligometastasis (PFS: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < .0001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P < .0001) and recurrence (OS: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; P = .002). Conclusions: In conclusion, addition of local treatment to systemic therapy can improve survival in patients with advanced EC, particularly in those with oligometastasis or recurrent diseases.

Network analysis of histopathological image features and genomics data improving prognosis performance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer, but the prediction of prognosis remains a challenge. METHODS: We collected whole-slide histopathological images, corresponding clinical and genetic information from the The Cancer Imaging Archive and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases and randomly divided patients into training (n = 197) and validation (n = 84) cohorts. After feature extraction by CellProfiler, we used 2 different machine learning techniques (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation-regularized Cox and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to select prognosis-related image features and genes, respectively. These features and genes were integrated into a joint model using random forest and used to create a nomogram that combines other predictive indicators. RESULTS: A total of 4 overlapped features were identified, represented by the computed histopathological risk score in the random forest model, and showed predictive value for overall survival (test set: 1-year area under the curves (AUC) = 0.726, 3-year AUC = 0.727, and 5-year AUC = 0.764). The histopathological-genetic risk score (HGRS) integrating the genetic information computed performed better than the model that used image features only (test set: 1-year AUC = 0.682, 3-year AUC = 0.734, and 5-year AUC = 0.78). The nomogram (gender, stage, and HGRS) achieved the highest net benefit according to decision curve analysis compared to HGRS or clinical model. CONCLUSION: This study developed a histopathological-genetic-related nomogram by combining histopathological features and clinical predictors, providing a more comprehensive prognostic assessment for clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients.

Integrating MR radiomics and dynamic hematological factors predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Purpose: We aimed to integrate MR radiomics and dynamic hematological factors to build a model to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients with ESCC receiving NCRT and esophagectomy between September 2014 and September 2022 were retrospectively included. All patients underwent pre-treatment T2-weighted imaging as well as pre-treatment and post-treatment blood tests. Patients were randomly divided to training set and testing set at a ratio of 7:3. Machine learning models were constructed based on MR radiomics and hematological factors to predict pCR, respectively. A nomogram model was developed to integrate MR radiomics and hematological factors. Model performances were evaluated by areas under curves (AUCs), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative. Results: A total of 82 patients were included, of whom 39 (47.6 %) achieved pCR. The hematological model built with four hematological factors had an AUC of 0.628 (95%CI 0.391-0.852) in the testing set. Two out of 1106 extracted features were selected to build the radiomics model with an AUC of 0.821 (95%CI 0.641-0.981). The nomogram model integrating hematological factors and MR radiomics had best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.904 (95%CI 0.770-1.000) in the testing set. Conclusion: An integrated model using dynamic hematological factors and MR radiomics is constructed to accurately predicted pCR to NCRT in ESCC, which may be potentially useful to assist individualized preservation treatment of the esophagus.

Preoperative CT-based radiomic prognostic index to predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. A subset of patients may benefit from PORT. We aimed to identify patients with NSCLC who could benefit from PORT. METHODS: Patients from cohorts 1 and 2 with pathological Tany N2 M0 NSCLC were included, as well as patients with non-metastatic NSCLC from cohorts 3 to 6. The radiomic prognostic index (RPI) was developed using radiomic texture features extracted from the primary lung nodule in preoperative chest CT scans in cohort 1 and validated in other cohorts. We employed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regularisation model for data dimension reduction, feature selection, and the construction of the RPI. We created a lymph-radiomic prognostic index (LRPI) by combining RPI and positive lymph node number (PLN). We compared the outcomes of patients who received PORT against those who did not in the subgroups determined by the LRPI. RESULTS: In total, 228, 1003, 144, 422, 19, and 21 patients were eligible in cohorts 1-6. RPI predicted overall survival (OS) in all six cohorts: cohort 1 (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.18-4.52), cohort 2 (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.26-2.14), cohort 3 (HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.45-4.3), cohort 4 (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.52), cohort 5 (HR = 2.56, 95% CI: 0.73-9.02), cohort 6 (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 0.53-10.03). LRPI predicted OS (C-index: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75) better than the pT stage (C-index: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.63), pT + PLN (C-index: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.70), and RPI (C-index: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.75). The LRPI was used to categorize individuals into three risk groups; patients in the moderate-risk group benefited from PORT (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.91; p = 0.02), while patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups did not. CONCLUSIONS: We developed preoperative CT-based radiomic and lymph-radiomic prognostic indexes capable of predicting OS and the benefits of PORT for patients with NSCLC.

MR radiomics predicts pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: More than 40% of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), who have favorable prognosis and may benefit from an organ-preservation strategy. Our study aims to develop and validate a machine learning model based on MR radiomics to accurately predict the pCR of ESCC patients after nCRT. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, eligible patients with ESCC who underwent baseline MR (T2-weighted imaging) and nCRT plus surgery were enrolled between September 2014 and September 2022 at institution 1 (training set) and between December 2017 and August 2021 at institution 2 (testing set). Models were constructed using machine learning algorithms based on clinical factors and MR radiomics to predict pCR after nCRT. The area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff analysis were used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study, 82 in the training set and 73 in the testing set. The radiomics model was constructed based on two radiomics features, achieving AUCs of 0.968 (95%CI 0.933-0.992) in the training set and 0.885 (95%CI 0.800-0.958) in the testing set. The cutoff analysis resulted in an accuracy of 82.2% (95%CI 72.6-90.4%), a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI 58.3-91.7%), and a specificity of 85.7% (95%CI 75.5-96.0%) in the testing set. CONCLUSION: A machine learning model based on MR radiomics was developed and validated to accurately predict pCR after nCRT in patients with ESCC.

Multileaf Collimator Modeling and Commissioning for Complex Radiation Treatment Plans Using 2-Dimensional (2D) Diode Array MapCHECK2.

Purpose: This study aims to develop a data-collecting package ExpressMLC and investigate the applicability of MapCHECK2 for multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling and commissioning for complex radiation treatment plans. Materials and methods: The MLC model incorporates realistic parameters to account for sophisticated MLC features. A set of 8 single-beam plans, denoted by ExpressMLC, is created for the determination of parameters. For the commissioning of the MLC model, 4 intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans specified by the AAPM TG 119 report were transferred to a computed tomography study of MapCHECK2, recalculated, and compared to measurements on a Varian accelerator. Both per-beam and composite-beam dose verification were conducted. Results: Through sufficient characterization of the MLC model, under 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria, MapCHECK2 can be used to accurately verify per beam dose with gamma passing rate better than 90.9% and 89.3%, respectively, while the Gafchromic EBT3 films can achieve gamma passing rate better than 89.3% and 85.7%, respectively. Under the same criteria, MapCHECK2 can achieve composite beam dose verification with a gamma passing rate better than 95.9% and 90.3%, while the Gafchromic EBT3 films can achieve a gamma passing rate better than 96.1% and 91.8%; the p-value from the Mann Whitney test between gamma passing rates of the per beam dose verification using full MapCHECK2 package calibrated MLC model and film calibrated MLC model is .44 and .47, respectively; the p-value between those of the true composite beam dose verification is .62 and .36, respectively. Conclusion: It is confirmed that the 2-dimensional (2D) diode array MapCHECK2 can be used for data collection for MLC modeling with the combination of the ExpressMLC package of plans, whose doses are sufficient for the determination of MLC parameters. It could be a fitting alternative to films to boost the efficiency of MLC modeling and commissioning without sacrificing accuracy.

Real world practice of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a national survey of radiation oncologists in China.

BACKGROUND: Results from Lung ART and PORT-C trials suggest that postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) cannot routinely be recommended as standard treatment in completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients, but their effects on the real-world practice of PORT in China remain unclear. METHODS: A national cross-section survey was conducted by using an online survey service. Participants were voluntarily recruited using a river sampling strategy. A link to the survey was posted on websites of radiation oncologist associations and tweets from public WeChat accounts. The survey collected the real names of participants to ensure that they were board-certified radiation oncologists. RESULTS: A total of 484 radiation oncologists were included with a median age of 40 years (IQR, 35-47). A total of 377 (77.9%) participants were male, and 282 (58.1%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience practicing thoracic radiotherapy. Before Lung ART and PORT-C trials were published, 313 (64.7%) respondents recommended PORT, 11 (2.3%) did not recommend it, and 160 (33.1%) reported that they made decisions based on risk factors. After the presentation of two trials, only 42 (8.7%) did not recommend PORT, while 108 (22.3%) recommended it, and 334 (69.0%) made decisions based on risk factors. The five most commonly considered risk factors among these 334 respondents were as follows: nodal extracapsular extension, the highest lymph node (LN) station involved, the number of dissected mediastinal LN stations, the number of positive mediastinal LN stations, and surgical approaches. In addition, the majority of all 484 respondents recommended a total dose of 50 Gy, lung stump + ipsilateral hilus + regions containing positive LNs as the targeted region, lung V20 < 25%, and heart V30 < 40% as dose constraints for PORT. CONCLUSION: Most Chinese radiation oncologists recommended PORT for completely resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients based on risk factors, especially status of LN station.

Higher Lung and Heart Doses Decrease Early and Long-Term Survival, Respectively, in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation.

Purpose: Cardiopulmonary toxic effects may reduce the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have examined whether the heart and lung doses affect overall survival (OS). We investigated the correlation of heart and lung doses with OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. Methods and Materials: This retrospective analysis included 307 patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. The total dose was 50 Gy. Landmark analyses were performed at 36 months, with hazard ratios (HRs) calculated separately for events occurring up to 36 months (early survival) and after 36 months (long-term survival). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was performed to balance the characteristics of the high- and low-dose groups. We performed sensitivity analyses at 24 and 48 months. Results: The median follow-up period was 67.42 months. Heart doses were significantly correlated with long-term survival (HR, 1.14; P = .015) but not with early survival (HR, 0.97; P = .41) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .58). Lung doses were marginally significantly correlated with early survival (HR, 1.03; P = .07) but not with long-term survival (HR, 1.00; P = .85) or whole survival (HR, 1.02; P = .12). Higher heart and lung doses were associated with decreased long-term and early survival, respectively, before and after sIPTW. Landmark analyses at 24 and 48 months showed consistent results. Conclusions: For patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT, a higher heart dose was associated with decreased long-term survival, whereas a higher lung dose was associated with decreased early survival.