Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Conscious Cogn ; 19(1): 86-97, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20097581

RESUMO

Dehaene, Changeux, Naccache, Sackur, and Sergent (2006) and Koch and Tsuchiya (2007) recently proposed taxonomies that distinguish between four processing states, based on bottom-up stimulus strength and top-down attentional amplification. The aim of the present study was to empirically test these processing states using the priming paradigm. Our results showed that attention (prime attended or not) and stimulus strength (prime presented subliminally or not) significantly modulated priming effects: either receiving top-down attention or possessing sufficient bottom-up strength was a prerequisite for a stimulus to elicit priming. When both top-down attention and sufficient bottom-up strength were present, the priming effect was boosted. The origins of the observed priming effects also varied between different processing states. We can conclude that our empirical study using the priming paradigm confirmed the presence of four processing states, which displayed a differential pattern of response priming effects and differential origins of the response priming effects.


Assuntos
Atenção/fisiologia , Estado de Consciência/fisiologia , Adolescente , Sinais (Psicologia) , Pesquisa Empírica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Orientação/fisiologia , Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos/fisiologia , Mascaramento Perceptivo/fisiologia , Estimulação Luminosa , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologia , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Estimulação Subliminar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa