Validation of the dispositional adult hyperfocus questionnaire (AHQ-D).

Hyperfocus (HF), or intense, deep concentration on a task, has gained significant research attention in recent years, particularly in regard to clinical populations such as Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The present work aims to provide validation of the 12-item dispositional adult hyperfocus questionnaire (AHQ-D) as a quantitative metric of HF in adults. We preregistered the study design and hypotheses. We administered the AHQ-D and several additional questionnaires to 347 adults (mean ± SD age: 33 ± 11 years; 47% female). Exploratory factor analysis revealed high factor loadings (0.57-0.81) on a single HF factor; item response theory analysis suggested that the questionnaire items had high discrimination and covered a wide range of responses; and we report strong internal consistency metrics (Cronbach's alpha 0.93, mean split-half reliability 0.93). Replicating our previous work, HF was positively correlated with Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) scores (r(345) = 0.53), suggesting that HF may be related to ADHD traits (though in this sample we did not specifically recruit individuals with ADHD). The AHQ-D demonstrated the hypothesized convergent validity; HF on the AHQ-D was positively correlated with HF measured using a different HF scale (r(344) = 0.69), as well as flow (r(345) = 0.12) and mind wandering (r(345) = 0.39) scores. AHQ-D HF scores showed a weak negative correlation with grit (r(345) = - 0.29). Though there was a weak negative correlation between HF and social desirability response tendency (r(345) = - 0.24), suggesting that those who care more about what others think may report less HF, there was no relationship between HF and extrasensory perception beliefs (r(345) = 0.01), suggesting that participants were not simply biased in their response tendencies. Taken together, we demonstrate strong scale metrics for the AHQ-D, the expected convergent validity, and a general lack of response bias, in addition to replicating our previous association of HF with ADHD traits. We suggest that the AHQ-D can be confidently used in future work as a valid way to measure HF in adults.

Daily artificial gravity partially mitigates vestibular processing changes associated with head-down tilt bedrest.

Microgravity alters vestibular signaling and reduces body loading, driving sensory reweighting. The unloading effects can be modelled using head-down tilt bedrest (HDT). Artificial gravity (AG) has been hypothesized to serve as an integrated countermeasure for the declines associated with HDT and spaceflight. Here, we examined the efficacy of 30 min of daily AG to counteract brain and behavior changes from 60 days of HDT. Two groups received 30 min of AG delivered via short-arm centrifuge daily (n = 8 per condition), either in one continuous bout, or in 6 bouts of 5 min. To improve statistical power, we combined these groups (AG; n = 16). Another group served as controls in HDT with no AG (CTRL; n = 8). We examined how HDT and AG affect vestibular processing by collecting fMRI scans during vestibular stimulation. We collected these data prior to, during, and post-HDT. We assessed brain activation initially in 12 regions of interest (ROIs) and then conducted an exploratory whole brain analysis. The AG group showed no changes in activation during vestibular stimulation in a cerebellar ROI, whereas the CTRL group showed decreased activation specific to HDT. Those that received AG and showed little pre- to post-HDT changes in left vestibular cortex activation had better post-HDT balance performance. Whole brain analyses identified increased pre- to during-HDT activation in CTRLs in the right precentral gyrus and right inferior frontal gyrus, whereas AG maintained pre-HDT activation levels. These results indicate that AG could mitigate activation changes in vestibular processing that is associated with better balance performance.