Delineation of factors associated with prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair leads to a clinical pathway and improves quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services define laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) as outpatient procedure. We identified our institutional length of stay (LOS) to be above the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) benchmark of 1 day [interquartile range (IQR) 2 days]. This study was undertaken to investigate risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay and design an intervention to decrease median LOS. METHODS: This study analyzed institutional NSQIP data on patients who underwent elective LVHR from 2006 to 2011 to define factors associated with prolonged LOS, defined as LOS > 2 days. Modifiable factors identified in the initial analysis were included in a clinical care pathway to impact LOS. We repeated the NSQIP data analysis after implementation (4/2011-9/2012) to assess the effect of our intervention. Analysis was by univariate, ANOVA and logistic regression models. RESULTS: During the pre-implementation period, 80 patients with a median age of 54 years (31-84) stayed a median of 2 days (IQR 3). On univariate analysis, factors associated with prolonged LOS included operative time, mesh size, amount of narcotics used and female gender. In multivariate analysis, operative time and narcotics used were associated with a prolonged LOS, C statistic = 0.88. Introduction of a clinical pathway focusing on non-narcotic pain relief resulted in a decrease in mean narcotic usage from 223 to 63 mg morphine equivalents/patient (p < 0.0001), decrease in median LOS to 1 day (IQR 2) (p = 0.027), in line with NSQIP benchmarks, a slight decrease in complications and a 10% decrease in hospital cost. CONCLUSION: High narcotic use and long operative times are independent predictors of prolonged LOS in our patient population. Introduction of a standardized clinical care pathway designed to reduce perioperative narcotic use resulted in shorter LOS, improved quality and cost savings for patients undergoing LVHR.

Unsatisfied patient's rights: A survey on the views of patients, nurses and physicians.

Neglecting patients' rights in a health care system can give rise to a challenging situation between health care providers and patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the views of patients as recipients of healthcare services and physicians and nurses, as healthcare providers, regarding the unsatisfied demands of different aspects of patients' rights in 3 hospitals representing three types of settings (teaching, private, and public). This was a cross-sectional descriptive analytical study. Data were gathered using a questionnaire which was filled out by an interviewer for the patients and self administered for nurses and physicians. The research venues were one general teaching hospital, one first class private hospital, and one non-teaching public hospital, and all 3 were in Tehran. The questionnaire consisted of some general questions about respondents' demographics, and 21 questions concerning the importance of patients' rights, and how well patients' rights were observed. Overall, 143 patients, 143 nurses (response rate: 61%) and 82 physicians (response rate: 27.5%) completed the questionnaire. The degrees of unsatisfied demands were different depending on the various views within each group regarding the degree of importance and observance of each right, which was measured by the Likert's scale ranging from 0.0 (no importance, no observance) to 10.0 (absolutely important, full observance). Concerning the non-normal distribution, the collected data were analyzed by non-parametric tests using the SPSS software (ver. 11.5). Results showed that the studied groups had significantly different views. The most prominent issue concerned patients' to make an informed decision, which was particularly unsatisfactory in the teaching hospital. The results of this research indicate that healthcare providers, especially physicians, need to be informed to show more respect for patients' rights in terms of access to clinical information and making decisions. The results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between the opinions of patients and health care providers regarding the extent of unsatisfied demands of patients' rights. According to the patients, the level of unsatisfied demands of these rights is far higher than that expressed by physicians.