RESUMO
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To compare the performance of five prognostic models [RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR), Barnholtz-Sloan-Kattan nomogram (BSKN), diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA), and Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)] against actual survival in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS +/- WBRT. MATERIALS/METHODS: 100 consecutive patients treated with SRS +/- WBRT between January 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were binned according to 33 percentiles of the predicted survival distribution for the BSKN and dsGPA models to compare with LungmolGPA, RPA and SIR. Pearson's correlation coefficients between predicted and observed survival were estimated to quantify the proportion of variance in observed survival. RESULTS: Median survival for the entire cohort was 13.5 months, with predicted vs actual MS by BSKN, SIR, dsGPA, RPA, adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA, and nonadenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA was 3.8 vs 15.6 months, 7 vs 13.5 months, 9.4 vs 13.5 months, 10.3 vs 13.5 months, 13.7 vs 13.7 months, and 9.8 vs 9.7 months, respectively. The BSKN model and adenocarcinoma LungmolGPA created three groups with a statistically significantly different MS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: All models under-predicted MS and only the BSKN and Lung-molGPA model stratified patients into three risk groups with statistically significant actual MS. The prognostic groupings of the adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA group was the best predictor of MS, and showed that we are making improvements in our prognostic ability by utilizing molecular information that is much more widely available in the current treatment era.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Irradiação Craniana , Radiocirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peripheral NLR, PLR, and LMR have prognostic value in various malignancies as they are surrogates for inflammation. Recent studies have identified NLR, PLR, and LMR correlate with patient outcomes in cervical cancer patients however there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal time point for assessing these markers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cervical cancer patients underoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT). NLR, PLR, and LMR values were identified before, during, and after dCRT and both relative and absolute changes in these values were calculated and compared with patient outcmoes. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients who met the includsion criteria were identified. NLR values before, during, and after dCRT correlated with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, increasing NLR after treatment was associated with worse PFS and OS. LMR before and after treatment had a positive correlation with PFS however increasing LMR during dCRT was found to have a negative correlation with PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: NLR serves as a prognostic indicator irrespective of timing with response to dCRT. While higher LMR before treatment was a positive prognostic indicator, increasing LMR was found to negatively correlate with PFS and OS.
Assuntos
Neutrófilos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Quimiorradioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Linfócitos , Monócitos , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict for survival in cancer patients. In patients receiving multimodality therapy, the effect of therapy on the NLR and PLR is not well understood. We evaluated changes in NLR and PLR among locally advanced esophageal cancer patients who received trimodality therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of nonmetastatic patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy at our institution between March 2000 and April 2012. NLR and PLR values were obtained for the following time points (TPs): (I) at diagnosis before CRT; (II) after CRT but prior to surgery; and (III) after surgery. We evaluated changes in NLR and PLR using the difference and ratio between TPs. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the independent prognostic significance of NLR and PLR. RESULTS: This IRB-approved study included the records of 83 consecutive patients with stage II-IV esophageal cancer. The median age was 60 years, and median follow-up was 29.3 months. Patients were treated to a median prescription dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 50.4-56.4 Gy) in 28-33 fractions. Median NLR and PLR were 3.3 and 157.2, 12 and 645, and 11.5 and 391.7 at TPs 1, 2, and 3, respectively. On multivariate analysis, superior OS was associated with PLR ≥250 at TP3 (P=0.03), PLR decrease ≥609.2 between TP2 and TP3 (P=0.02), and PLR ratio (TP3/TP1) ≥1.08 (P=0.03). Inferior progression-free survival (PFS) was associated with NLR ≥36 at TP2 (P=0.0008), NLR increase ≥28.3 between TP1 and TP2 (P=0.0005), and PLR ratio (TP2/TP3) ≥0.38 (P=0.1). Pathologic complete response (PCR) was less likely for adenocarcinoma (AC) histology (P=0.03), NLR ≥10.6 at TP2 (P=0.04), and NLR increase ≥4.6 from TP1 to TP2 (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine NLR and PLR values at various time intervals throughout treatment and demonstrate a correlation between OS, PFS, and PCR in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer.