RESUMO
Background@#For patients diagnosed with asymptomatic, non-functional pituitary incidentaloma (PI), periodic follow-up is generally proposed. However, the recommended follow-up period differs among existing guidelines and consensus is lacking. Thus, this study aimed to suggest follow-up periods for PI based on MRI characteristics. @*Methods@#Between 2007 and 2023, 245 patients who were diagnosed with PI were retrospec-tively assessed. Their mean clinical and neuroradiological follow-up periods were 74.2 and 27.3 months, respectively. Their baseline clinical and neuroradiological characteristics were analyzed. These 245 patients were divided into two groups: those with PI size progression and those without PI size progression. Additionally, neuroradiological features of each group were analyzed according to presumptive diagnoses of PI. @*Results@#PI size increased in 33 of 245 patients. For the remaining 212 patients, PI size de-creased or stayed unchanged. Of the 33 patients with PI size progression, ten underwent surgery.Stalk deviation (p<0.001) and lesion enhancement (p=0.001) were significantly more observed in those with PI size progression than in those without PI size progression. MRI morphological factors were not related to changes in PI size in the presumptive Rathke’s cleft cyst group. In the presumptive pituitary adenoma group, absence of tumor enhancement (p<0.001) and stalk deviation (p<0.001) were significantly associated with tumor reduction and progression, respectively. @*Conclusion@#Our findings support an additional guideline for patients with asymptomatic non-func-tional PI without stalk deviation and enhancement. For these patients, the clinical and neuroradiological follow-up periods could be reduced.
RESUMO
We have always attempted to create a standard treatment protocol for patients with gastric cancer. However, many debates still exist regarding gastric cancer treatment. For the past 2 years, at the Annual Congress of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association, we have presented a grand symposium on the "Debates on the strategy for treating gastric cancer". In 2008, four major topics were discussed and voted on after discussion. The four major topics were proximal location treatment for early gastric cancer, management choices for pyloric obstruction with advanced gastric cancer, management of liver metastasis, and reconstruction methods after a distal gastrectomy. The opinions of the audience for six minor topics were expressed by an electronic voting system. In 2009, the four main topics were treatment for submucosal tumor sized around 2 cm, laparoscopic gastrectomy in T2N1 gastric cancer, choices for managing gastric lymphoma, and application of a pylorus preserving procedure for early gastric cancer at the antrum. The opinions of the audience for these six minor topics were expressed by an electronic voting system, as was conducted in 2008. It was good opportunity to identify a point of contact about the debates on managing gastric cancer. The results of these debates and studies will identify the best methods to treat patients with gastric cancer.