Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brain ; 140(11): 2993-3011, 2017 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29088353

RESUMO

Neuroprosthetics research in amputee patients aims at developing new prostheses that move and feel like real limbs. Targeted muscle and sensory reinnervation (TMSR) is such an approach and consists of rerouting motor and sensory nerves from the residual limb towards intact muscles and skin regions. Movement of the myoelectric prosthesis is enabled via decoded electromyography activity from reinnervated muscles and touch sensation on the missing limb is enabled by stimulation of the reinnervated skin areas. Here we ask whether and how motor control and redirected somatosensory stimulation provided via TMSR affected the maps of the upper limb in primary motor (M1) and primary somatosensory (S1) cortex, as well as their functional connections. To this aim, we tested three TMSR patients and investigated the extent, strength, and topographical organization of the missing limb and several control body regions in M1 and S1 at ultra high-field (7 T) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, we analysed the functional connectivity between M1 and S1 and of both these regions with fronto-parietal regions, known to be important for multisensory upper limb processing. These data were compared with those of control amputee patients (n = 6) and healthy controls (n = 12). We found that M1 maps of the amputated limb in TMSR patients were similar in terms of extent, strength, and topography to healthy controls and different from non-TMSR patients. S1 maps of TMSR patients were also more similar to normal conditions in terms of topographical organization and extent, as compared to non-targeted muscle and sensory reinnervation patients, but weaker in activation strength compared to healthy controls. Functional connectivity in TMSR patients between upper limb maps in M1 and S1 was comparable with healthy controls, while being reduced in non-TMSR patients. However, connectivity was reduced between S1 and fronto-parietal regions, in both the TMSR and non-TMSR patients with respect to healthy controls. This was associated with the absence of a well-established multisensory effect (visual enhancement of touch) in TMSR patients. Collectively, these results show how M1 and S1 process signals related to movement and touch are enabled by targeted muscle and sensory reinnervation. Moreover, they suggest that TMSR may counteract maladaptive cortical plasticity typically found after limb loss, in M1, partially in S1, and in their mutual connectivity. The lack of multisensory interaction in the present data suggests that further engineering advances are necessary (e.g. the integration of somatosensory feedback into current prostheses) to enable prostheses that move and feel as real limbs.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica , Córtex Motor/diagnóstico por imagem , Movimento/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/inervação , Pele/inervação , Córtex Somatossensorial/diagnóstico por imagem , Tato/fisiologia , Extremidade Superior , Adulto , Idoso , Membros Artificiais , Mapeamento Encefálico , Eletromiografia , Feminino , Neuroimagem Funcional , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Córtex Motor/fisiologia , Plasticidade Neuronal , Córtex Somatossensorial/fisiologia
2.
J Occup Rehabil ; 22(4): 532-40, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562093

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify self-perception variables which may predict return to work (RTW) in orthopedic trauma patients 2 years after rehabilitation. METHODS: A prospective cohort investigated 1,207 orthopedic trauma inpatients, hospitalised in rehabilitation, clinics at admission, discharge, and 2 years after discharge. Information on potential predictors was obtained from self administered questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: In the final model, a higher likelihood of RTW was predicted by: better general health and lower pain at admission; health and pain improvements during hospitalisation; lower impact of event (IES-R) avoidance behaviour score; higher IES-R hyperarousal score, higher SF-36 mental score and low perceived severity of the injury. CONCLUSION: RTW is not only predicted by perceived health, pain and severity of the accident at the beginning of a rehabilitation program, but also by the changes in pain and health perceptions observed during hospitalisation.


Assuntos
Emprego/psicologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Retorno ao Trabalho , Autoimagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/reabilitação , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Reabilitação Vocacional , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Licença Médica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Ferimentos e Lesões/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa