Epidemiology and O-Serotypes of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Disease in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) are a leading cause of invasive infections in adults. The study aimed to evaluate the incidence of microbiologically confirmed invasive ExPEC disease in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-PNB), O-serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance profiles of associated E. coli isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult men (≥18 years) undergoing TRUS-PNB were enrolled. The TRUS-PNB procedure was performed according to local standard of care, including preferences of prophylactic antibiotics. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. RESULTS: Of the 4,951 patients (mean age 66.9 years) enrolled 4,935 (99.7%) underwent TRUS-PNB (95.1% received prophylactic antibiotics); 98.9% completed the study. Overall incidence of invasive ExPEC disease was 0.67% (33/4,935 patients; 95% CI 0.46-0.94); highest incidence was in the U.S. (0.97%, 14/1,446; 95% CI 0.53-1.62). Prevalence of the 10 selected O-serotypes O1, O2, O4, O6, O8, O15, O16, O18, O25 and O75 was 52.0% (95% CI 31.3-72.2). E. coli isolates showed highest resistance rates to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (76%; 95% CI 54.8-90.6 for both). Among fluoroquinolone-resistant ExPEC isolates, prevalence of the 10 selected O-serotypes was 60%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an estimate of microbiologically confirmed invasive ExPEC disease incidence following TRUS-PNB. Information on E. coli O-serotype distribution and associated antibiotic resistance profiles from invasive ExPEC disease cases in the first 30 days following TRUS-PNB may help guiding antibiotic use and inform development of a prophylactic ExPEC vaccine.

Safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine for extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ESTELLA): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: ExPEC4V (JNJ-63871860) is a bioconjugate vaccine, containing O-antigens from Escherichia coli serotypes O1A, O2, O6A, and O25B, developed for the prevention of invasive extra-intestinal pathogenic E coli (ExPEC) disease. We aimed to assess safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of ExPEC4V in healthy adults. METHODS: In this phase 2 randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study, we recruited healthy adults (≥18 years with a body-mass index of 35 kg/m2 or less) between Nov 16, 2015, and Aug 8, 2017, and randomly assigned them to receive a single dose of ExPEC4V (antigen O1A:O2:O6A:O25B content 4:4:4:4 µg [group 1]; 4:4:4:8 µg [group 2], 8:8:8:8 µg [group 3], 8:8:8:16 µg [group 4], or 16:16:16:16 µg [group 5]) or placebo. The primary objectives were evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ExPEC4V and determination of its dose-dependent immunogenicity 15 days after vaccination by ELISA in individuals who had received at least one vaccination dose. Antibody titres and safety evaluation were used to select two ExPEC4V doses for assessment up to day 360. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02546960. FINDINGS: Of 848 enrolled participants, 843 (99%) received the ExPEC4V vaccine (757) or placebo (86) and were included in the safety analysis. Of 757 participants vaccinated with ExPEC4V, 222 (29%) had a solicited local adverse event and 325 (43%) had any solicited systemic adverse event, compared with 11 (13%) and 30 (35%) of 86 participants in the control group. Symptoms were mild-to-moderate. The most frequently reported solicited local adverse event was pain or tenderness (205 [27·1%] of 757 in combined ExPEC4V groups) and the most frequently reported solicited systemic adverse event was fatigue (208 [27·6%] of 757). Only 13 (2%) of 843 had a grade 3 event. At day 15, 80% or more of all participants achieved a two times or greater increase in serotype-specific IgG antibodies (except O25B at the lowest dose, 103 [72%] of 144). At day 360, 66% (95% CI 56·47-74·33) of participants in group 2 and 71% (62·13-78·95) of participants in group 4 selected for long-term follow-up maintained a two times or greater increase in serotype-specific antibody compared with baseline. INTERPRETATION: EXPEC4V seemed well tolerated and elicited robust and functional antibody responses across all serotypes, doses, and age groups. For the two dosages evaluated (4:4:4:8 µg and 8:8:8:16 µg), the immune response persisted for 1 year. FUNDING: Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the ExPEC4V (JNJ-63871860) vaccine for prevention of invasive extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli disease: A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy Japanese participants.

This Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of different doses of ExPEC4V conjugate vaccine (4-16µg Polysaccharide [PS]/serotype) in healthy Japanese participants, stratified into younger (≥20 to <50 years) or older age groups (≥50 years). Within each age group, participants were randomized to a single vaccination with 1 of 3 dose levels of ExPEC4V (4, 8 and 16 µg PS/serotype) or placebo. Safety and tolerability were the primary objectives; immunogenicity was secondary. Of the 48 participants, 47 (98%) completed; one (2%) in the placebo group discontinued. A total of 48% participants had ≥1 AE (younger group: n = 13 [54%]; older group: n = 10 [41.7%]). Solicited and unsolicited AEs were reported in 44% and 8% participants, respectively in the combined ExPEC4V groups. Pain/tenderness (n = 11 [31%]) and redness (n = 9 [25%]) were the most frequently reported solicited local AEs, whereas fatigue (n = 4 [11%]), headache (n = 4 [11%]), muscle pain (n = 2 [6%]), and malaise (n = 5 [14%]) were the most common solicited systemic AEs in the combined ExPEC4V group. No serious AEs, deaths, or discontinuation due to AEs were reported. All doses were immunogenic with an increase in IgG (ELISA) geometric mean titers of at least 5-fold from baseline to Days 15 and 30 for all serotypes. Of participants vaccinated with ExPEC4V, 75% - 100% demonstrated an ELISA titer increase of ≥2-fold. Strong correlation observed between ELISA and OPK. ExPEC4V was well tolerated and elicited an immunogenic response at all dose levels (up to 16 µg PS/serotype) in healthy Japanese participants.

Reaching more children with vaccines in developing countries: key challenges of innovation and delivery.

As we reach the deadline for the United Nations fourth Millennium Development Goal to reduce child mortality, many inequalities in vaccine access still exist, particularly for children in developing countries. Here we discuss some of the barriers to vaccine access in these countries, as well as some of the innovative approaches that could address these. Finally, we discuss the need to create a global environment conducive to innovation directed at low-resource settings, aimed to ultimately increase vaccine coverage.

Evaluation of irritation and sensitisation of two 50 microg/day oestrogen patches.

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively assess the irritation and sensitisation of the Estradot transdermal oestrogen patch, in healthy postmenopausal women, using the Menorest transdermal oestrogen patch, as a comparator. METHODS: In an open-label, single-centre, randomised, active-treatment, within-patient controlled study, 208 healthy postmenopausal women, age range 40-70 years, received and completed simultaneous treatment with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Estradot) and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Menorest). The treatment was given for 72 h, then 96 h, for eight successive applications during an induction phase, and for 72 h during a challenge phase. There was a 14-day resting period between phases. Skin irritation (measured by erythema on a scale of 0-4), topical sensitisation, patch adherence and local skin reaction, were assessed and recorded immediately before or after removal of each patch, as appropriate. RESULTS: Most patients experienced a significant difference in irritation with Menorest than with Estradot (P < 0.0001) at the end of the induction phase. Patch loss was also significantly higher for Menorest as compared to Estradot (P = 0.0253) at the end of the induction phase. Most incidences of erythema were classified as slight (score of 1), and there was no significant difference in the percentage of topical sensitisation, or in the incidence of local skin reactions between Estradot and Menorest. Patch loss was low for both systems. CONCLUSIONS: Estradot demonstrates reduced skin irritation, superior adhesion and a lower rate of patch loss compared to Menorest.

Dose proportionality study of four doses of an estradiol transdermal system, Estradot.

OBJECTIVES: To establish dose proportionality among four doses of a new estradiol transdermal system (ETS), Estradot, in healthy postmenopausal women and to evaluate the wear and irritation properties of the ETS. METHODS: In an open label, single-dose, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy postmenopausal women, age range 44-64 years, wore four different sizes of Estradot, 2.5, 3.75, 5.0 and 10.0 cm(2) that were expected to release estradiol at 0.025, 0.0375, 0.05 and 0.10 mg/day, respectively. Each patch was worn for 84 h with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Blood samples were drawn prior to medication, then at various time points following patch application. Serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone were determined by validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS) methods. Skin irritation, (erythema and edema), patch adherence and local skin reaction were assessed and recorded following patch removal. After removal, the patches were assayed for residual estradiol to estimate the apparent dose delivered. RESULTS: The baseline-corrected, mean maximum serum estradiol concentrations (C(max)) for the 2.5, 3.75, 5.0 and 10.0 cm(2) patches were 24.0, 34.8, 50.1 and 96.0 pg/ml, respectively, and for estrone were 10.5, 15.2, 21.8 and 41.0 pg/ml, respectively. The four Estradot patches adhered well during the study. No significant skin irritation was observed with any of the four treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a dose proportional relationship of increased serum concentrations of estradiol with increasing size of the Estradot patches. The four doses of Estradot demonstrated good systemic and local skin tolerability.

Comparative bioequivalence studies with Estradot and Menorest transdermal systems.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative bioavailability of Estradot, a small size, new generation estradiol transdermal system (ETS) to Menorest, in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: In two open-label, single center, randomized, crossover, bioequivalence studies, healthy postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years received treatment with all the test regimens. In Study 1 (single-dose study), patients wore 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day), 10 cm(2) (100 microg/day) Estradot and 29 cm(2) (100 microg/day) Menorest for 84 h. In Study 2 (multiple-dose study), patients wore a regimen of four consecutive treatments with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) new generation patch, Estradot and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) patch, Menorest. Blood samples were drawn at various time-points in both studies. Estradiol and estrone serum levels were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or radioimmunoassay methods. Skin irritation (erythema and edema), patch adherence and local skin reaction were assessed following patch removal. RESULTS: In Study 1, baseline-uncorrected C(max) for estradiol for Estradot 50 and 100 microg/day and Menorest 100 microg/day was 54.8, 106.2 and 101.6 pg/ml, respectively, and C(max) for estrone was 75.6, 97.0 and 98.3 pg/ml, respectively. In Study 2, the baseline-uncorrected mean maximum serum concentration (C(max)) for estradiol for Estradot 50 microg/day and Menorest 50 microg/day patches was 56.7 and 52.7 pg/ml, respectively, and C(max) for estrone was 41.7 and 41.3 pg/ml, respectively. No significant skin irritation was observed in either study, but Estradot caused less skin irritation than Menorest. CONCLUSIONS: Estradot produced comparable serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone and caused less skin irritation than Menorest.