Thermoplastic polymers as water substitutes.

Background. New applications of 3D printing have recently appeared in the fields of radiotherapy and radiology, but the knowledge of many radiological characteristics of the compounds involved is still limited. Therefore, studies are needed to improve our understanding about the transport and interaction of ionizing radiation in these materials.Purpose. The purpose of this study is to perform an analysis of the most important radiation interaction parameters in thermoplastic materials used in Fused Deposition Modeling 3D printing. Additionally, we propose improvements to bring their characteristics closer to those of water and use them as water substitutes in applications such as radiodiagnosis, external radiotherapy, and brachytherapy.Methods. We have calculated different magnitudes as mass linear attenuation, mass energy absorption coefficients, as well as stopping power and electronic density of several thermoplastic materials along with various compounds that have been used as water substitutes and in a new proposed blend. To perform these computations, we have used the XCOM and ESTAR databases from NIST and the EGSnrc code for Montecarlo simulations.Results. From the representation of the calculated interaction parameters, we have been able to establish relationships between their properties and the proportion of certain chemical elements. In addition, studying these same characteristics in different commercial solutions used as substitutes for water phantoms allows us to extrapolate improvements for these polymers.Conclusion. The radiological characteristics of the analyzed thermoplastic materials can be improved by adding some chemical elements with atomic numbers higher than oxygen and by using polyethylene in new blends.

Study of dose dependence on density in planar 3D-printed applicators for HDR Ir192 surface brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: This paper describes a method to evaluate the influence of 3D printed plesiotherapy applicators densities in the most clinically relevant dosimetric planes of these brachytherapy treatments. Studied densities range goes from that of water to that of air including the intermediate applicators densities made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid, materials used as Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) filaments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All applicators were manufactured by means of FDM 3D printing and a special empty applicator of ABS walls was designed to be filled with water or air. In each of these applicators, the values of the dose and gamma index at the surface and at the prescription depth were measured in clinical conditions, using EBT films. RESULTS: Analysis of results allow us to conclude that the influence of the applicators density on the dose value in the studied materials depends on the distance at which the dose is measured. Thus, at the prescription depth no influence is observed, however this influence becomes noticeable near the surface of the applicators with dose differences of more than 10% for densities close to 0.4 g/cm3. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the density of FDM manufactured applicators should be taken into account when calculating surface dose for low density applicators, as variations caused by density can have clinical implications because is the surface dose that is associated with the toxicity of brachytherapy skin treatments.