Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery.

There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Diagnosis of Compressive Myelopathy at the Thoracolumbar Junction.

PURPOSE: The disc level in the thoracolumbar junction at which measurement of the central motor conduction time in the lower limbs (CMCT-LL) is useful for a diagnosis remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the spinal vertebral level at which compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the ligamentum flavum in the thoracolumbar junction is detectable using CMCT-LL. METHODS: We preoperatively measured CMCT-LL in 57 patients (42 men, 15 women; aged 35-85 years) with a single ossification of the ligamentum flavum from the T10-11 to T12-L1 disc levels and in 53 healthy controls. Motor evoked potentials after transcranial magnetic stimulation, compound muscle action potentials, and F waves were recorded from the abductor hallucis. Central motor conduction time in the lower limbs was calculated as follows: Motor evoked potential latency - (compound muscle action potential latency + F latency - 1)/2 (ms). Central motor conduction time in the lower limbs was compared between patients and controls. RESULTS: Compressive lesions were located at the T10 to 11 level in 27 patients, the T11 to 12 level in 28, and the T12-L1 level in 2. Central motor conduction time values in the lower limbs at the T10 to 11 level (19.9 ± 4.7 ms) and T11 to 12 level (18.1 ± 3.4 ms) were significantly longer than control values (11.8 ± 1.1 ms; P < 0.01). Central motor conduction time in the lower limbs was not calculated at the T12-L1 level because motor evoked potentials were not recorded in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that CMCT-LL was significantly longer in patients with ossification of the ligamentum flavum at the T10 to 11 and T11 to 12 levels because the S2 segment of the spinal cord is caudal at the T12 vertebral body level. Therefore, CMCT-LL is useful for diagnosing thoracolumbar junction disorders proximal to the T12 vertebral body level.