Safety and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies: A Japanese phase I study.

This multicenter, open-label, phase I study assessed the safety and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies. Parts 1 (dose confirmation) and 2 (dose expansion) of this three-part study are reported. Treatment was a single dose of 100 mg acalabrutinib (day 1), followed by a washout period and then twice daily 100 mg acalabrutinib in part 1, or twice daily 100 mg acalabrutinib in part 2. Patients from parts 1 and 2 with r/r chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and r/r mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) were assessed as r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. Twenty-five patients received treatment (part 1, n = 6). Median age was 71.0 years. Nine (one patient from part 1) and 13 (two patients from part 1) patients were included in the r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 88% of patients (grade ≥3, 36%); the most common were headache (28%) and purpura (24%), both grade 1/2. No AEs resulted in treatment discontinuation or death. Median duration of treatment was 31, 20, and 7 months for part 1, r/r CLL/SLL cohort, and r/r MCL cohort, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 89% and 62% for the r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for the r/r CLL/SLL cohort and was 7 months for the r/r MCL cohort. Acalabrutinib (100 mg twice daily) was generally safe and well-tolerated in adult Japanese patients with B-cell malignancies.

First-in-human phase I study of E7090, a novel selective fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are a family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases involved in regulating cellular processes. FGFR mutations are implicated in oncogenesis, representing therapeutic potential in the form of FGFR inhibitors. This phase I, first-in-human study in Japan evaluated safety and tolerability of E7090, a potent selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation (daily oral dose of 1-180 mg) was carried out to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamic markers (serum phosphate, fibroblast growth factor 23, and 1,25-(OH)2 -vitamin D) were also evaluated. A total of 24 patients refractory to standard therapy or for whom no appropriate treatment was available were enrolled. No DLT were observed up to the 140-mg dose; one patient in the 180-mg cohort experienced a DLT (increased aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, grade 3). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-dependent increases in the maximum concentration and area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration were observed up to 180 mg. Dose-dependent increases were observed in all pharmacodynamic markers and plateaued at 100-140 mg, indicating sufficient FGFR pathway inhibition at doses ≥100 mg. In conclusion, E7090 showed a manageable safety profile with no DLT at doses ≤140 mg. Maximum tolerated dose was not determined. The recommended dose for the follow-up expansion part, restricted to patients with tumors harboring FGFR alterations, was determined as 140 mg, once daily.

Efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer not meeting trial eligibility criteria: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated in phase III trials. However, as patients receiving eribulin in daily practice do not necessarily meet all the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, data for such patients are limited. METHODS: We identified patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, treated with eribulin monotherapy between July 2011 and December 2015 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Patients who would have met the following eligibility criteria from the EMBRACE trial were included in the eligible group, and the rest were included in the ineligible group: 1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status 0-2; 2) adequate function of principal organs; and 3) absence of active infection. We compared the relative dose intensity (RDI), tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events between the groups. Nominal and continuous values were compared using the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients included, 34 were classified into the ineligible group and 169 into the eligible group. Initial dose reduction and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were more common in the ineligible group (initial dose reduction: 23.5% in the ineligible group vs. 7.7% in the eligible group, p = 0.011; treatment discontinuation due to AEs: 11.8% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.045). However, RDI (66% vs. 71%, p = 0.130), response rate (15.6% vs. 18.1%, p = 1.000), PFS (3.7 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.913), OS (11.5 months vs. 16.1 months, p = 0.743), AEs requiring hospitalization (5.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 1.000), and grade 3/4 AEs were similar in both groups. PFS, OS, AEs requiring hospitalization, and discontinuation due to AEs in the eligible group were comparable to those found in previous phase III trials. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of eribulin monotherapy was demonstrated in a broader patient population than that eligible for clinical trials. Eribulin may be a treatment option in these patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, considering dose reduction and pre-existing dysfunctions.

Survival after failure of first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients: differences between Japan and the rest of the world.

In this review, we focus on post-progression survival after first-line chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer, and particularly the differences between Japan and the rest of the world. We reviewed 15 recent phase III trials of which 4 were solely recruited from Japanese and 11 from rest of the world. The patient characteristics age, performance status, previous gastrectomy and the number of metastatic sites were similar in Japan and rest of the world. However, the diffuse histological type was more common in Japan. While overall survival was longer in Japan (10.5-14.1 vs. 7.9-12.2 months), progression-free survival tended to be shorter in Japan (3.6-6.0 vs. 3.1-7.4 months). Post-progression survival calculated as the difference between median overall survival and progression-free survival was clearly longer in Japan (6.9-8.6 vs. 2.4-6.2 months). The proportion of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy (%2nd-CX) was quite different in Japan and rest of the world (69-85% vs. 11-59%). Correlations between %2nd-CX and post-progression survival were strong (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; ρ = 0.86, P < 0.001). Correlations between %2nd-CX and ratio of post-progression survival to total overall survival were also strong (ρ = 0.84, P < 0.001). Because a survival benefit of second-CX was documented in several phase III trials, it can be concluded that higher %2nd-CX partly contributed to extended post-progression survival. However, considering that second-CX increased survival only by ~1.5 months at median, other factors such as third-line chemotherapy may have some influences to prolonged post-progression survival.

Electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) monitoring for adverse event management during cabozantinib treatment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: protocol for a three-arm, randomised, multicentre phase II trial (e-PRO vs paper-PRO or usual care).

INTRODUCTION: Cabozantinib monotherapy is an option for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, cabozantinib dose modification and discontinuation due to symptomatic adverse events (AEs) remains a challenge. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help manage symptomatic AEs, which is reported to lead to improved quality of life (QOL), avoidance of drug discontinuation and better survival. This study aims to investigate the clinical benefits of PROs in patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib and the most appropriate medium for PRO monitoring (electronic [e]-PRO or paper-PRO). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is being conducted at about 35 sites in Japan. Patients aged ≥18 years with unresectable or metastatic RCC initiating treatment with cabozantinib monotherapy are eligible and will be randomised to: (1) e-PRO monitoring, (2) paper-PRO monitoring or (3) usual care without PRO monitoring. Recruitment began in December 2021 (target sample size, 105). Patients start treatment with cabozantinib 60 mg once daily, and in the PRO groups, will record daily medication intake, weight, temperature, blood pressure and AEs. Endpoints include the proportion of patients with a ≥5-point deterioration on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI-19; primary endpoint), progression-free survival, QOL, dose adjustments, relative dose intensity, treatment-emergent AEs and frequency of interventions for AEs outside of the scheduled visits. Patient and physician opinions of the PRO monitoring systems and patient compliance with e-PRO/paper-PRO input are also being measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is being conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Clinical Trials Act. Written informed consent is being obtained from all patients, and the protocol has been approved by the Hokkaido University Hospital Certified Review Board (approval number, CRB021-005). The results will be presented at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs011210055.

Impact of the Duration of Diabetes Mellitus on the Outcome of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Study.

Objective To assess the impact of the duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who received gemcitabine monotherapy as the standard therapy before the introduction of combination regimens. The treatment outcomes of gemcitabine were compared among three groups classified according to the duration of DM: no DM, short DM (<4 years), and long DM (≥4 years). Results Among 350 patients, 218, 87, and 45 patients were classified into the no DM, short DM, and long DM groups, respectively. In comparison to the no DM group, the univariate hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-2.02; p=0.027] and 1.33 (95% CI, 0.93-1.89; p=0.081), respectively, in the long DM group, and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.85-1.46; p=0.426) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.40; p=0.678), respectively, in the short DM group; the multivariate-adjusted HRs were 1.33 (95% CI, 0.94-1.89; p=0.103) and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.95-1.98; p=0.095) in the long DM group and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.85-1.47; p=0.410) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.82-1.46; p=0.533) in the short DM group. The survival outcomes of the long DM group tended to remain poorer in analyses using different cutoffs of DM duration as, well as in hospital-specific analyses. Conclusion Long-standing DM may be associated with shorter PFS and OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy (post-Cx) after first-line chemotherapy (1st-Cx) and after second-line chemotherapy (2nd-Cx), and survival benefit of third-line chemotherapy (3rd-Cx) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Phase III trials of systemic chemotherapy for AGC published in English between 2005 and 2015 or presented at annual meetings of ASCO or ESMO between 2013 and 2015 were searched. Numbers of patients, types of chemotherapy, patient baseline, proportion of patients receiving post-Cx (post-Cx%), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) of each treatment arm were surveyed; trials not reporting these parameters were excluded. Median post-progression survival (mPPS) was calculated as the difference between mOS and mPFS. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients between post-Cx% and survival outcomes (mOS and mPPS) were calculated. The effect of post-Cx% on survival outcomes adjusted for the types of chemotherapy and patient characteristics was evaluated by meta-regression. RESULTS: Overall, 25 phase III trials of AGC were selected: 15 trials with 31 arms for 1st-Cx, and 10 trials with 16 arms for 2nd-Cx. Weighted Spearman's correlation coefficients for post-Cx% and mOS/mPPS were 0.520/0.739 for 1st-Cx, and 0.767/0.823 for 2nd-Cx. Meta-regression analyses adjusting for types of chemotherapy, age, and PS showed that a 10% increase in post-Cx% was associated with prolongation of mOS by 1.033 months for 1st-Cx and 0.344 months for 2nd-Cx. CONCLUSIONS: Post-Cx% both after 1st-Cx and 2nd-Cx were correlated with mOS/mPPS, suggesting a survival benefit of 3rd-Cx in addition to that of 2nd-Cx for AGC.

Efficacy of capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with or without prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective study to assess the outcomes of capecitabine for advanced breast cancer (ABC) after perioperative fluoropyrimidines (FPs). METHODS: The charts of patients with ABC who received capecitabine between 2008 and 2016 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were reviewed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups: an FP group (prior perioperative FP use) and a non-FP group (no prior FP use). RESULTS: Overall, 288 patients (FP n = 105; non-FP n = 183) were analyzed. The two groups had similar patient characteristics. The FP group had significantly poorer PFS than the non-FP group (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.73; p = 0.036), although the OS did not differ significantly between the groups (multivariate HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.67-1.50; p = 0.994). With different cut-off values (relapse-free interval [RFI] = 3, 4, and 5 years), multivariate HRs for PFS were 1.32-1.67 (short RFI), and 1.00-1.25 (long RFI). A trend for a larger HR in the FP group compared to the non-FP group with short RFI than in that with long RFI was also seen for OS. Response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) did not differ significantly between the groups (RR in FP vs non-FP 13.8 vs 21.0%; p = 0.173; DCR 54.0 vs 59.9%; p = 0.418). No significant difference in AEs existed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extra caution is needed when capecitabine is considered for patients with ABC who used perioperative FP, especially those who had early recurrence.

Prolonged Hypocalcemia Following a Single Dose of Denosumab for Diffuse Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer after Total Gastrectomy.

Hypocalcemia is a significant adverse effect of denosumab. We herein report a case of prolonged hypocalcemia in a patient with multiple risk factors for hypocalcemia, including gastrectomy, increased bone turnover, and a poor performance status. Hypocalcemia developed after denosumab treatment for diffuse bone metastasis of gastric cancer, despite oral supplementation with vitamin D and calcium. To avoid serious prolonged hypocalcemia, a thorough assessment of the bone calcium metabolism is required before initiating denosumab treatment.

Efficacy and safety of taxane monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer refractory to triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Taxane monotherapy is widely used for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin. Triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) is a promising regimen for first-line chemotherapy of AGC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of taxane monotherapy in patients refractory to DCS. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of taxane monotherapy in patients with AGC refractory to first-line therapy with DCS between January 2010 and April 2015. Selection criteria were as follows: ECOG PS of 0-2, treatment with taxane monotherapy in second-line or third-line therapy after failure of second-line irinotecan, absence of massive ascites, and adequate organ function. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in this study. Of these, 15 patients received paclitaxel while another 15 received nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in either second- or third-line treatment. Median age for the second/third-line group was 64.0/62.0 (range 27-75/42-75); 14/13 (93.3/86.7%) had ECOG PS of 0 or 1. No patients achieved complete or partial response and stable disease was observed in 37.5/35.7% of the patients in the second/third line. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 and 5.8 months in the second-line group, and 2.0 and 4.5 months in the third-line group, respectively. The incidences of any grade ≥3 adverse events in the second-line group and the third-line group were 60.0 and 33.3%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Taxane monotherapy after DCS failure had acceptable toxicities but was ineffective in AGC patients.