Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(5): 455-62, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25765569

RESUMO

Our study aimed to assess whether intraoperative esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility measurement using the EndoFLIP EF325 catheter (Crospon Ltd., Galway, Ireland) could potentially be used to guide laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), potentially modifying the operation outcome and comparing this clinically to our previous technique of gastroscopic assessment. Following a full diagnostic assessment with manometry and endoscopy patients with achalasia were divided into two groups. A retrospective cohort of patients operated on between 2007 and 2010 had a gastroscopy-guided LHM (G-LHM) with a standardized myotomy of 8 cm on the esophagus and 3 cm on the stomach. From 2010, patients were prospectively studied with an EndoFLIP-guided LHM (E-LHM). The length of the myotomy was dictated by intraoperative distensibility monitoring of the EGJ. All patients with achalasia recorded Urbach quality of life scoring preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. A further group of normal laparoscopic control patients (E-LC) without any esophageal pathology also underwent intraoperative EGJ distensibility monitoring. Thirty-eight patients took part, 15 in the E-LC group, 8 in G-LHM group and 15 in the E-LHM group. We revealed that patients with achalasia in the E-LHM group had a significantly smaller EGJ cross-sectional area and distensibility than the E-LC group. Myotomy and fundoplication increased the distensibility of the EGJ to a value greater than normal control patients. Patients in the G-LHM group had a standard myotomy of 11 cm; patients in the E-LHM group had a variable length myotomy of 6 cm (IQR 5.0-6.0). In both G-LHM and E-LHM groups, there was a significant improvement in patient's quality of life with no significant difference between the groups. Our study has shown that the EndoFLIP system was effective at measuring distensibility changes during LHM. LHM significantly increases the distensibility of the EGJ and also significantly improves patient symptoms. E-LHM may reduce the overall myotomy length, and this does not appear to compromise the clinical outcome.


Assuntos
Elasticidade , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Junção Esofagogástrica/fisiopatologia , Gastroscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Acalasia Esofágica/fisiopatologia , Junção Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Humanos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 27(7): 637-44, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24033477

RESUMO

Increased esophagogastric junction distensibility has been implicated in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Previous authors have demonstrated a reduction in distensibility following anti-reflux surgery, but the changes during the operation are not clear. Our study aimed to ascertain the feasibility of measuring intraoperative distensibility changes and to assess if this would have potential to modify the operation. Seventeen patients with GERD were managed in a standardized manner consisting of preoperative assessment with symptom scoring, endoscopy, 24 hours pH studies, and manometry. Patients then underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with intraoperative distensibility measurement using an EndoFLIP EF-325 functional luminal imaging probe (Crospon Ltd, Galway, Ireland). This device utilizes impedance planimetry technology to measure cross-sectional area and distensibility within a balloon-tipped catheter. This is inflated at the esophagogastric junction to fixed distension volumes. Thirty-second median cross-sectional area and intraballoon pressure measurements were recorded at 30 and 40 mL balloon distensions. Measurement time points were initially after induction of anesthesia, after pneumoperitoneum, after hiatal mobilization, after hiatal repair, after fundoplication, and finally pre-extubation. Postoperatively, patients continued on protocol and were discharged after a two-night stay tolerating a sloppy diet. Patients with a hiatus hernia on high-resolution manometry had a significantly higher initial esophagogastric junction distensibility index (DI) than those without. Hiatus repair and fundoplication resulted in a significant overall reduction in the median DI from the initial to final recordings (30 mL balloon distension reduction of 3.26 mm(2) /mmHg (P = 0.0087), 40 mL balloon distension reduction of 2.39 mm(2) /mmHg [P = 0.0039]). There was also a significant reduction in the DI after pneumoperitoneum, hiatus repair, and fundoplication at 40 mL balloon distension. Two individual cases in the series highlight the utility of the system in potentially changing the operation. After fundoplication, patient 7 recorded a DI of 0.47 mm(2) /mmHg, the lowest in our series, and subsequently required reoperation because of significant symptoms of dysphagia. Patient 12 had a fundoplication that appeared visually too tight and was converted intraoperatively to a Lind 270° wrap resulting in a change in the DI from 0.65 to 0.89 mm(2) /mmHg. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication results in a significant reduction in the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction. The EndoFLIP system is able to demonstrate significant changes during the operation and may help guide intraoperative modification. Larger multicenter studies with long-term follow up would be beneficial to develop a target range of distensibility associated with good outcome.


Assuntos
Junção Esofagogástrica/fisiopatologia , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Impedância Elétrica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Hérnia Hiatal/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação
3.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 35: 38-43, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30275949

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis and six randomized controlled trials show higher 30-day complication rates with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) than with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). AIM: To identify any difference in 30-day outcomes of patients treated with LRYGB or LSG when a standardized technique and identical post-operative protocol was followed with all procedures being conducted either by or under the supervision of a single consultant surgeon who had significant experience in bariatric surgery prior to commencing independent practice. METHODS: A prospectively collected database of all patients under primary LRYGB or LSG, between March 2010 and February 2017, was analyzed. Data on demographics, length-of-stay (LOS), conversion to open, 30-day complications and mortality were reviewed. RESULTS: Over a seven-year period, 485 patients (LRYGB-279 and LSG-206) were included. There were no significant demographic differences and no difference in the pre-operative risk scoring [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and obesity surgery mortality risk score (OSMRS)] between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of LOS (p = 0.275), complications (p = 0.920), re-admissions (p = 0.593) or re-operations (p = 0.366) within 30-days. There were no conversions to open or in-patient mortality in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous studies, we found no difference in early complication rates between LRYGB and LSG in a comparable cohort when performed by a surgeon with sufficient experience in bariatric surgery.

4.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; : 1-5, 2018 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30112939

RESUMO

Introduction Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is technically demanding and has an associated learning curve. We published previously that bariatric fellowship reduces the learning curve of primary LRYGB and improves patient outcomes after one year of independent practice. However, the long-term effect of fellowship is unknown. We therefore aimed to compare the 30-day outcomes of LRYGB between the first year of a surgeon's independent practice with the subsequent six years. Materials and methods A prospective database of patients undergoing primary LRYGB under a single surgeon from March 2010 until February 2017 was analysed. Two groups were studied: first year (< 1 year) and the subsequent six years (≥ 1 year) of independent practice. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay, conversion to open surgery, perioperative complications and mortality were compared. Results Among 279 eligible patients, 74 (26.5%) were in the < 1 year group and 205 (73.5%) in ≥ 1 year group. The preoperative risk scores, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, P = 0.00; obesity surgery mortality risk score (OS-MRS), P = 0.04) were significantly higher in ≥ 1 year group. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes (length of stay, P = 0.38; total complications, P = 0.20; readmissions, P = 1.00; reoperations, P = 0.60) between the two groups. Conclusions Bariatric fellowship reduces the learning curve for LRYGB and helps to achieve excellent outcomes in the first and subsequent years of independent practice. The higher risk profile of ≥ 1 year group did not equate to an increase in complications, suggesting that experience and standardisation may help in handling complex cases. To our knowledge, this represents the only such study in the literature.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa