Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788848

RESUMO

To support antimicrobial stewardship in livestock production, there is a growing array of point of care diagnostics to guide antimicrobial treatment. The primary objective of this observational study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 5 point of care tests currently available in Australia for guiding lactational treatment of non-severe clinical mastitis. A secondary objective was to describe the pathogen profiles of mastitis-causing organisms in cows managed in barns ("intensive") and on pasture ("non-intensive"). Foremilk samples (n = 641) were collected by farm staff in dairy herds in Australia (n = 30) and tested at a university laboratory using a reference test and 5 index tests. The reference test was aerobic culture on Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood followed by MALDI-TOF for identification of isolates. The following point of care tests were evaluated as index tests: Accumast®, biplate, Check-Up, Mastatest®, and 3M Petrifilm. We found that 23% of samples were contaminated, with the median herd contamination prevalence being 22%. After excluding contaminated samples, the most common diagnoses (according to the reference test) in intensive herds were no growth (31.7%), Klebsiella spp. (28.1%), E. coli (15.0%), and Strep. uberis (8.4%). The most common diagnoses in non-contaminated samples from cows in non-intensive herds were Strep. uberis (35.0%), no growth (26.9%), and E. coli (13.3%). After 24 h of incubation, all index tests demonstrated limited diagnostic sensitivity for identification of pathogens of interest (range: 0.06 to 0.63). Diagnostic performance was better at the group-level, with sensitivity and specificity for identification of non-contaminated gram-positive growths (i.e., cases that are widely considered to be candidates for antimicrobial treatment) being 0.84 and 0.75 (biplate), 0.76 and 0.90 (Accumast), 0.89 and 0.79 (Check-Up), 0.67 and 0.83 (Petrifilm), and 0.55 and 0.81 (Mastatest). In intensive herds, 22.7 to 40% of cases were classified as antimicrobial treatment candidates by index tests, which was less than for cows in non-intensive herds (41.3 to 61.0%). Despite limited diagnostic reliability at genus and species level, and the need to ensure samples are collected aseptically, our findings indicate that implementation of selective treatment protocols using the tests evaluated in this study would likely reduce antimicrobial usage in Australian herds.

2.
Vet Sci ; 10(9)2023 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756072

RESUMO

Monitoring 100-day in-calf rate (100DICR) is an integral part of the assessment of reproductive performance in year-round calving dairy herds. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of month on 100DICR in year-round calving herds in New South Wales (NSW), Australia and determine whether a fluctuating 100DICR target is an appropriate alternative to a constant 100DICR target. The 100DICR is defined as the percentage of all current lactating cows over 100 days in milk (DIM) that conceive on or before 100 DIM. As dairy cows are typically dried off 7 months after conception, 100DICR was an approximate 7-month rolling average. Mean monthly 100DICRs were calculated with a generalised linear model for six NSW north coast herds located 15-140 km from the coast and four NSW south coast herds located less than 10 km from the coast, over a two-year period. The mean 100DICR was lowest in May at 28.62% (95%CI 28.31-28.93) and increased during winter and spring, peaking in December at 34.74% (95%CI 34.32-35.15). The observed trend was similar for north and south coast herds, although north coast herds experienced a greater change in 100DICR from the peak to a nadir of 27.58% (95%CI 27.18-27.98), a 7.15-point difference, compared to south coast herds with a nadir of 30.18% (95%CI 29.69-30.67), a 4.67-point difference between the peak and nadir. In conclusion, 100DICR is affected by month with the lowest 100DICRs observed in late autumn and the highest 100DICRs observed in late spring and early summer. Therefore, a fluctuating target 100DICR is an appropriate alternative to a constant target when assessing reproductive performance in year-round calving herds. While the district does not affect mean 100DICR per se, the district does affect the difference between peak and nadir 100DICR.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa