Impact of pharmacists during in-hospital resuscitation or medical emergency response events: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the impact of the presence of a pharmacist on medication and patient related outcomes during the emergency management of critically ill patients requiring resuscitation or medical emergency response team care in a hospital setting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of databases from January 1995 to April 2023 was conducted to identify studies of contemporary pharmacist practice. Results were extracted and analysed for included studies, those evaluating the impact of the presence of a pharmacist on medication and patient related outcomes during the emergency management of critically ill hospitalised patients requiring resuscitation or medical emergency response team care. To determine risk of bias, the Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment scale was used for non-randomised studies and the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. RESULTS: Of 1345 studies identified, 54 were selected for full text review, and 30 were included in the final analysis. There were 29 cohort studies and one randomised controlled trial. The studies reported the impact of a pharmacist for a variety of patient presentations. The study team assigned each study to one of eight patient cohorts: acute stroke, cardiac arrest, rapid response calls, S-T segment elevation myocardial infarction, acute haemorrhage, major trauma resuscitation, sepsis and status epilepticus. The most frequently reported outcome, associated with a statistically significant benefit in 23 studies, was time to medication administration. Few studies reported a significant difference in patient outcome measures such as mortality. Only 8 of the 30 studies were assessed to have a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review provide support for a beneficial impact of a pharmacist presence and intervention during resuscitation or medical emergency response team care, with significant improvements in outcomes such as time to initiation of time-critical medications, medication appropriateness and guideline compliance. However, studies were predominantly small and retrospective and were not powered to detect differences in patient related measures such as length of stay and mortality. Future research should investigate the clinical impacts of the pharmacist in ED resuscitation settings in controlled, prospective studies with robust sampling methods.

Case series profile of olanzapine post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome.

Olanzapine pamoate is an intramuscular depot injection for the treatment of schizophrenia. Approximately 1.4% of patients develop a serious adverse event called post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), characterised by drowsiness, anticholinergic and extrapyramidal symptoms. The objective is to investigate olanzapine PDSS presentations including clinical features and treatment approach. This is a retrospective review of olanzapine PDSS patients from three toxicology units and the NSW Poisons Information Centre between 2017 and 2022. Adult patients were included if they had intramuscular olanzapine then developed PDSS criteria. Clinical symptoms, treatment, timing and length of symptoms were extracted into a preformatted Excel database. There were 18 patients included in the series, with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 38-58) and male predominance (89%). Median onset time post injection was 30 min (IQR: 11-38). PDSS symptoms predominate with drowsiness, confusion and dysarthria. Median length of symptoms was 24 h (IQR: 20-54). Most common treatment included supportive care without any pharmacological intervention (n = 10), benzodiazepine (n = 4) and benztropine (n = 3). In one case, bromocriptine and physostigmine followed by oral rivastigmine were given to manage antidopaminergic and anticholinergic symptoms respectively. This proposed treatment combination could potentially alleviate some of the symptoms but needs further studies to validate the findings. In conclusion, this case series supports the characterisation of PDSS symptomology predominantly being anticholinergic with similar onset (<1 h) and duration (<72 h). Bromocriptine is proposed to manage PDSS if patients develop severe dopamine blockade and physostigmine followed by rivastigmine for anticholinergic delirium.

Overdose and off-label psychotropic prescribing in patients with borderline personality disorder: A retrospective series.

OBJECTIVE: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is common and poses many clinical challenges. Despite limited evidence of effectiveness, psychotropic medications are often prescribed. We aimed to characterise overdose presentations in patients with BPD. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational series of patients with BPD presenting to a tertiary hospital following an overdose from January 2019 to December 2020. Medical records were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics, overdose details, clinical features, treatment, and disposition. RESULTS: There were 608 presentations in 370 people (76% female), median age 28 years (range 16-75 years). The majority (331[89%]) of patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication, with 129 (35%) being prescribed three or more different psychotropic agents. Of the total prescribed psychotropics, 520/1459 (36%) were for off-label indications. The majority of agents (860/1487[58%]) taken in overdose were prescribed. The commonest drug classes taken in overdose were benzodiazepines (241[16%]) and antipsychotics (229[15%]). Severe toxicity occurred in 99 (16%) cases with either coma (GCS<9) or hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg). The commonest agent associated with severe toxicity was quetiapine 39/99 (39%). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic polypharmacy is common in BPD, often with off-label indications. Prescribed medications are commonly taken in overdose. Quetiapine is over-represented both in off-label prescribing and associated harm.

Optimising alkalinisation and its effect on QRS narrowing in tricyclic antidepressant poisoning.

AIMS: The objectives were to determine the effect of NaHCO3 and/or mechanical ventilation on the biochemical profile and serum alkalinisation in tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) poisoning and investigate the impact of effective alkalinisation therapy on the QRS interval in TCA poisoning. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of TCA poisonings from three Australian toxicology units and a poisons information centre (Jan 2013 to Jan 2019). We included patients with TCA toxicity who ingested>10 mg/kg or had clinically significant toxicities consistent with TCA poisoning, and analysed patients' clinical, electrocardiogram and biochemical data. RESULTS: Of 210 patients, 84 received NaHCO3 and ventilation (dual therapy), 12 NaHCO3 , 46 ventilation and 68 supportive care treatment. When compared with single/supportive groups, patients who received dual therapy had taken a significantly higher median dose of TCA (1.5 g vs1.3 g, P < .001), a longer median maximum QRS interval (124 ms, interquartile ranges [IQR] 108-138 vs106 ms, IQR 98-115, P < .001) and were more likely to have seizures (14% vs3%, P = .006) and arrhythmias (17% vs1%, P < .001). The dual therapy group demonstrated greater increases in serum pH (median 0.11, IQR 0.04-0.17) compared to the single/supportive therapy group (median 0.03, IQR -0.01-0.09, p < .001). A greater proportion of patients reached the target pH 7.45-7.55 in the dual therapy group (59%) compared to the single/supportive therapy group (10%) (P < .001). For each 100 mmol bolus of NaHCO3 given, the median increase in serum sodium was 2.5 mmol/L (IQR 1.5-4.0). QRS narrowing occurred twice as quickly in the dual therapy vs single/supportive therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of NaHCO3 and mechanical ventilation was most effective in achieving serum alkalinisation and was associated with a more rapid narrowing of the QRS interval. We advise that the maximal dose of NaHCO3 should be <400 mmol (6 mmol/kg).

Acute Opioid Withdrawal Following Intramuscular Administration of Naloxone 1.6 mg: A Prospective Out-Of-Hospital Series.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Large doses of intramuscular (IM) naloxone are commonly used in out-of-hospital settings to reverse opioid toxicity; however, they are used less commonly in hospitals because of concerns about opioid withdrawal, particularly agitation. We aimed to determine the frequency of severe agitation following a single 1.6 mg IM naloxone dose. METHODS: We undertook a prospective study of adult (>15 years) patients treated by an Australian state ambulance service with 1.6 mg IM administration of naloxone for respiratory depression (respiratory rate <11 breaths/min and/or oxygen saturation <93% in room air) caused by presumed opioid poisoning. The primary outcome was the proportion of presentations with severe agitation (Sedation Assessment Tool score >1) within 1 hour of naloxone administration. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of presentations with acute opioid withdrawal (tachycardia [pulse rate >100 beats/min], hypertension [systolic >140 mm Hg], vomiting, agitation, seizure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or pulmonary edema), and reversal of respiratory depression (respiratory rate >10 breaths/min and saturation >92% or Glasgow Coma Scale score 15). RESULTS: From October 2019 to July 2021, there were 197 presentations in 171 patients, with a median age of 41 years (range, 18 to 80 years); of the total patients, 119 were men (70%). The most common opioids were heroin (131 [66%]), oxycodone (14 [7%]), and morphine (11 [6%]). Severe agitation occurred in 14 (7% [95% confidence interval {CI} 4% to 12%]) presentations. Opioid withdrawal occurred in 76 presentations (39% [95% CI 32% to 46%]), most commonly in the form of tachycardia (18%), mild agitation/anxiety (18%) and hypertension (14%). Three presentations (1.5%) received chemical sedation for severe agitation within 1 hour of naloxone administration. A single 1.6 mg dose of naloxone reversed respiratory depression in 192 (97% [95% CI: 94% to 99%]) presentations. CONCLUSION: Severe agitation was uncommon following the administration of 1.6 mg IM naloxone and rarely required chemical sedation.

D-dimer testing for early detection of venom-induced consumption coagulopathy after snakebite in Australia (ASP-29).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and marginal value of quantitative D-dimer testing for diagnosing venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) in people bitten by Australian snakes. DESIGN, SETTING: Analysis of data for suspected and confirmed cases of snakebite collected prospectively by the Australian Snakebite Project, 2005-2019, from 200 hospitals across Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 1363 patients for whom D-dimer was quantitatively assessed within 24 hours of suspected or confirmed snakebite. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance of quantitative D-dimer testing for detecting systemic envenoming with VICC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC); optimal D-dimer cut-off value (maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity). RESULTS: D-dimer values exceeded 2.5 mg/L within three hours of the bite for 95% of patients who developed VICC, and were lower than 2.5 mg/L for 95% of non-envenomed patients up to six hours after snakebite. The AUC for diagnosing envenoming with VICC on the basis of quantitative D-dimer testing within six hours of snakebite was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98; 944 patients). Diagnostic performance increased during the first three hours after snakebite; for quantitative D-dimer testing at 2-6 hours, the AUC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.0); with a cut-off of 2.5 mg/L, sensitivity was 97.1% (95% CI, 95.0-98.3%) and specificity 99.0% (95% CI, 97.6-99.6%) for VICC. For 36 patients with normal international normalised ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 2-6 hours after snakebite, the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.0); with a cut-off of 1.4 mg/L, sensitivity was 94% (95% CI, 82-99%) and specificity 96% (95% CI, 94-97%). In all but one of 84 patients who developed VICC-related acute kidney injury, D-dimer values exceeded 4 mg/L within 24 hours of the bite. CONCLUSION: D-dimer concentrations assessed 2-6 hours after snakebite, with a cut-off value of 2.5 mg/L, could be useful for diagnosing envenoming with VICC.

Pregabalin poisoning and rising recreational use: a retrospective observational series.

AIMS: With rising use worldwide, pregabalin is increasingly implicated in poisoning deaths. We aimed to investigate the clinical effects and complications of pregabalin poisoning. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients presenting with pregabalin poisoning to two tertiary toxicology units from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2019. Patients were identified from prospective databases maintained by both units and data were extracted from these in addition to medical records. RESULTS: There were 488 presentations in 413 patients (237 [57%] male) over the five-year period. The median age was 41 years (IQR 31-50 years). Deliberate self-poisonings accounted for 342 (70%) presentations, with 121 (25%) recreational exposures. Recreational exposures increased over the period from 2 (4%) in the first year to 54 (39%) presentations in the final year. The median dose of pregabalin was 1200 mg (IQR 600-3000 mg, range 75-16 800 mg). Co-ingestions occurred in 427 (88%) presentations, with sedating agents being co-ingested in 387 (79%)-most commonly opioids and benzodiazepines in 201 (41%) and 174 (36%) presentations respectively. Coma (GCS < 9) occurred in 89 (18%) cases, with 52 (11%) patients being intubated. Only one (0.2%) of these patients had not co-ingested a sedating agent. Hypotension occurred in 26 (5%) cases, all with co-ingestants. Seizures occurred in 11 (2%) cases, 3/59 (5%) in pregabalin-only overdoses. The median length of stay was 16.5 hours (IQR 10-25 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin overdose does not cause severe toxicity, but rather mild sedation and, uncommonly, seizures. Coma is common in the presence of sedating co-ingestants. Recreational use is increasing.

Haemodialysis for lithium poisoning: Translating EXTRIP recommendations into practical guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the impact on practice of applying the Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) Workgroup criteria to lithium toxicity. METHOD: We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients from three hospitals who presented with chronic or acute on chronic lithium poisoning with a lithium concentration ≥1.3 mmol/L (2008-2018). We determined which criteria were met by patients and their subsequent course. We developed and validated a method to predict if lithium concentration would be >1mmol/L at 36 hours. RESULTS: There were 111 acute on chronic and 250 chronic lithium toxic patients. Nine patients (2.5%) were treated with haemodialysis. Six chronic patients had neurological sequelae. The "estimated lithium concentration at 36 hours > 1 mmol/L" criterion required pharmacokinetic calculations. A simple nomogram was developed using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and lithium concentration. For chronic toxicity, the nomogram would have correctly predicted lithium concentration >1.4 mmol/L at 36 hours in all except two patients. If EXTRIP criteria were followed, dialysis would have been instituted for 211 patients (58%). However, only 51 patients with chronic toxicity fulfilled both a concentration and a clinical criterion. Late neurological sequelae were observed in five out of six patients who fulfilled a concentration and a clinical criterion on admission, with the sixth meeting these criteria shortly after admission. CONCLUSIONS: The EXTRIP criteria are too broad, but minor modifications allow haemodialysis to be targeted to those most at risk of sequelae. Most acute on chronic poisonings do not need haemodialysis, but it might shorten hospital stay in those with very high concentrations. The nomogram accurately predicts the fall in lithium concentration for chronic poisoning.

Updated guidelines for the management of paracetamol poisoning in Australia and New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: Paracetamol is a common agent taken in deliberate self-poisoning and in accidental overdose in adults and children. Paracetamol poisoning is the commonest cause of severe acute liver injury. Since the publication of the previous guidelines in 2015, several studies have changed practice. A working group of experts in the area, with representation from all Poisons Information Centres of Australia and New Zealand, were brought together to produce an updated evidence-based guidance. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS (UNCHANGED FROM PREVIOUS GUIDELINES): The optimal management of most patients with paracetamol overdose is usually straightforward. Patients who present early should be given activated charcoal. Patients at risk of hepatotoxicity should receive intravenous acetylcysteine. The paracetamol nomogram is used to assess the need for treatment in acute immediate release paracetamol ingestions with a known time of ingestion. Cases that require different management include modified release paracetamol overdoses, large or massive overdoses, accidental liquid ingestion in children, and repeated supratherapeutic ingestions. MAJOR CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT IN THE GUIDELINES: The new guidelines recommend a two-bag acetylcysteine infusion regimen (200 mg/kg over 4 h, then 100 mg/kg over 16 h). This has similar efficacy but significantly reduced adverse reactions compared with the previous three-bag regimen. Massive paracetamol overdoses that result in high paracetamol concentrations more than double the nomogram line should be managed with an increased dose of acetylcysteine. All potentially toxic modified release paracetamol ingestions (≥ 10 g or ≥ 200 mg/kg, whichever is less) should receive a full course of acetylcysteine. Patients ingesting ≥ 30 g or ≥ 500 mg/kg should receive increased doses of acetylcysteine.

Neurotoxicity in chronic lithium poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Lithium-induced neurotoxicity typically occurs with chronic accumulation rather than following acute overdose. There is little emphasis in the literature on the protracted nature of lithium neurotoxicity long after the lithium concentration returns to the therapeutic range. AIMS: To characterise lithium neurotoxicity, with a view of increasing awareness of this important phenomenon. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of patients presenting with lithium-induced neurotoxicity over a 5-year period to a clinical toxicology unit. Patients were identified through the unit's database, and clinical notes were analysed. RESULTS: There were 22 patients, with a median age of 65 (range: 36-89) years. Six patients (27%) had previous lithium toxicity, and nine (41%) were regularly prescribed medications that impair lithium excretion. The median lithium concentration on presentation was 2.2 mmol/L, taking a median of 3 days to return to the therapeutic range. Reversible acute kidney injury was observed in 21 patients (95%) on presentation. The median length of stay was 13 (range: 3-95) days due mostly to delayed neurological recovery. Confusion was the predominant symptom, present in 21 (95%) patients, followed by tremors (18(82%)) and ataxia (16(73%)). Multiple investigations were performed to exclude delirium differentials, including 11 computed tomography (CT) and five magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans, all unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium neurotoxicity has a prolonged course. Its severity correlates poorly with lithium concentrations, which normalise quickly. Most poisonings occur in elderly patients with acute kidney injury. Prolonged delirium often prompts multiple unnecessary investigations. Rationalisation of lithium therapy is important in elderly patients.

Methamphetamine intoxication and acute kidney injury: A prospective observational case series.

AIM: The effects of methamphetamine intoxication on the kidney are not well reported. We aimed to investigate acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with methamphetamine intoxication, in particular its severity, duration and association with rhabdomyolysis. METHODS: This is a prospective observational series of methamphetamine-intoxicated patients presenting to an Emergency Department. Patients self-reporting recent methamphetamine use, with a positive urine drug screen and an elevated creatinine, were eligible for the study. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) was measured, and serum creatinine, creatine kinase and cystatin C concentrations were performed on arrival and at several time points until discharge from hospital. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: There were 634 presentations with methamphetamine intoxication over a 10-month period, with 73/595(12%) cases having an elevated serum creatinine concentration on arrival. Fifty presentations in 48 patients were included in the study. Most patients (85%) were male with a median age of 32 years. The median serum creatinine concentration on presentation was 125 µmol/L (IQR:113-135 µmol/L) with 45 (90%) presentations meeting diagnostic criteria for AKI. Concurrent rhabdomyolysis occurred in 22 (44%) presentations with a median CK of 2695 U/L (IQR:1598-5060 U/L). Cystatin C was elevated (> 0.98 mg/L) in 18 cases. An elevated NGAL concentration (>150 µg/L) was present in five (10%) cases. No patients required dialysis. The median length of stay was 19 hours (IQR 14-24 hours). CONCLUSION: AKI is common in methamphetamine intoxication. The kidney injury is relatively mild and short-lived, resolving with crystalloid therapy.

A Prospective Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Droperidol in Children for Prehospital Acute Behavioral Disturbance.

Study objective: Although uncommon, children (<16 years) with acute behavioral disturbance are a significant issue for emergency medical service providers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of droperidol in children with prehospital acute behavioral disturbance. Methods: This was a prospective observational study over 1 year investigating the use of droperidol (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) for children (< 16 years) with acute behavioral disturbance. Inclusion criteria for acute behavioral disturbance were defined by a sedation assessment tool score of ≥2 determined by the attending paramedic. The primary outcome was the proportion of adverse effects (need for airway intervention, oxygen saturation <90% and/or respiratory rate <12, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, sedation assessment tool score of -3 and dystonic reactions). Secondary outcomes included time to sedation (sedation assessment tool score decreased by 2 or more, or a score of zero), requirement for additional sedation, failure to sedate and proportion of sedation success defined as the number of patients successfully sedated who did not suffer any adverse events or receive additional sedation. Results: There were 96 patients (males 51 [53%], median age 14 years [range 7-15 years]) who presented on 102 occasions over the one year study period. Self-harm and/or harm to others was the commonest (74/105 [70%]) cause of acute behavioral disturbance followed by alcohol (16/105 [15%]). There were 9 adverse events in 8 patients (8/102 [8%]; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 3-13%) Five patients had hypotension, all asymptomatic and only one required treatment; 2 dystonic reactions managed with benztropine and one patient with respiratory depression. Median time to sedation was 14 min (interquartile range (IQR): 10-20 min; range: 3-85 min). There was no requirement for prehospital additional sedation (0/102 [0%]; 95% CI: 0-4%) and additional sedation in the first hour of arrival to hospital was required by 4 patients (4/102 [4%]; 95% CI: 1-10%). Overall successful sedation was achieved in 89 (87%) patients. Conclusions: The use of droperidol in children for acute behavioral disturbance in the prehospital setting is both safe and effective.

A Prospective Before and After Study of Droperidol for Prehospital Acute Behavioral Disturbance.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Acute behavioral disturbance is a common problem for emergency medical services. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of droperidol compared to midazolam in the prehospital setting. METHODS: This was a prospective before and after study comparing droperidol to midazolam for prehospital acute behavioral disturbance, when the state ambulance service changed medications. The primary outcome was the proportion of adverse effects (airway intervention, oxygen saturation < 90%, respiratory rate < 12, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, sedation assessment tool score -3 and dystonic reactions) in patients receiving sedation. Secondary outcomes included time to sedation, requirement for additional sedation, staff and patient injuries, and prehospital time. RESULTS: There were 141 patients administered midazolam and 149 patients administered droperidol in the study. Alcohol was the most common cause of acute behavioral disturbance. Fewer patient adverse events occurred with droperidol (11/149) compared to midazolam (33/141) (7% vs. 23%; absolute difference 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8% to 24%; p = 0.0001). Median time to sedation was 22 min (interquartile range [IQR]:18 to 35 min) for droperidol compared to 30 min (IQR:20 to 45 min) for midazolam. Additional prehospital sedation was required in 6/149 (4%) droperidol patients and 20/141 (14%) midazolam patients, and 11 (7%) droperidol and 59 (42%) midazolam patients required further sedation in the emergency department. There were no differences in patient or staff injuries, or prehospital time. CONCLUSIONS: The use of droperidol for acute behavioral disturbance in the prehospital setting is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter time to sedation, and fewer requirements for additional sedation.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients administered blood in the prehospital environment by a road based trauma response team.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics, clinical interventions and the outcomes of patients administered packed red blood cells (pRBCs) by a metropolitan, road based, doctor-paramedic trauma response team (TRT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study examining 18 months of historical data collated by the Queensland Ambulance Service TRT, the Pathology Queensland Central Transfusion Laboratory, the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and the Princess Alexandra Hospital Trauma Services was undertaken. RESULTS: Over an 18-month period (1 January 2011 to 30 June 2012), 71 trauma patients were administered pRBCs by the TRT. Seven patients (9.9%) died on scene and 39 of the 64 patients (60.9%) transported to hospital survived to hospital discharge. 57 (89.1%) of the transported patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, with a mean ISS, Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and Trauma-Injury Severity Score of 32.11, 4.70 and 0.57, respectively. No patients with an RTS < 2 survived to hospital discharge. 53 patients (82.8%) received additional pRBCs in hospital with 17 patients (26.6%) requiring greater than 10 units pRBCs in the first 24 h. 47 patients (73.4%) required surgical or interventional radiological procedures in the first 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: There is a potential role for prehospital pRBC transfusions in an integrated civilian trauma system. The RTS calculated using the initial set of observations may be a useful tool in determining in which patients the administration of prehospital pRBC transfusions would be futile.

Virtual Toxicology Service decreases the average length of stay of poisoned patients and saves bed days.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact a Virtual Toxicology Service had on the ALOS of poisoned patients. METHODS: This single-centre before-after study compares the ALOS of poisoned patients (diagnosis-related group X62, poisoning/toxic effects of drugs and other substances) following the introduction of a Virtual Toxicology Service in 2020. RESULTS: The ALOS decreased from 0.89 days in the 2-year pre-intervention period to 0.62 days in the 3-year post-intervention period, with a potential bed saving of 703 days. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a Virtual Toxicology Service appeared to be associated with a decreased ALOS of poisoned patients.